Channel photo updated

Channel
AnnaNevskayaArt
@AnnaNevskayaArt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
600subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001429516357 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AnnaNevskayaArt |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AnnaNevskayaArt |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 600 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 602 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 604 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 610 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 608 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 610 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 610 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 29 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
764 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 431 | 56.4% | |
| 🥰 | 75 | 9.82% | |
| ❤🔥 | 68 | 8.90% | |
| 🔥 | 58 | 7.59% | |
| 👍 | 44 | 5.76% | |
| 💘 | 32 | 4.19% | |
| 😍 | 13 | 1.70% | |
| 🎄 | 8 | 1.05% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 0.916% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 0.916% | |
| 🍓 | 6 | 0.785% | |
| 💋 | 5 | 0.654% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 0.524% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 0.393% | |
| ☃ | 2 | 0.262% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.131% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 764 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2024 to 4 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
День рождения! 🎂мой личный Новый год начинается сегодня ! Будет особенным , удачливым и благополучным! И пусть все дается легко и все получается! 😊🎉
❤44🥰12🔥9🎉7🍓3💋3👍2💘2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤52🔥21🥰7🍓3💅3❤🔥2👍2🍌1
На премьере фильма « Батя 2.Дед» . Очень хорошее доброе кино , история близкая и понятная всем! В кинотеатрах уже сегодня! С 3 апреля в кино!
❤34🥰15👍10🍌2💋2💅1
С наступающим Новым годом! Пусть будет лучше и счастливее ! Храните любовь и берегите близких! 🎄🥂❤️
❤60🔥13🎄7💘6☃2❤🔥2
Тёплая праздничная атмосфера царила в ресторане @boyarski24 на совместном Рождественском бранче «Секреты женской красоты» журнала OK @okmagazine_events и компании Герофарм @geropharm_official Спикеры и шутили, и затрагивали серьезные темы!
❤29👍10💘4❤🔥3😍3🔥1🥰1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥29❤9👍3😍3🥰2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤33🥰4😍2
« Беспринцыпные чтения. Версия будущего» в музее Атом. Новое интересное место на ВДНХ, которое очень рекомендую посетить. Послушали новые рассказы автора на тему будущего в исполнении известных артистов и побывали на экскурсии о создании атомной энергии в нашей стране. Есть о чем подумать на досуге в преддверии нового года!
❤🔥24❤8👍4😍3🥰1
Я всегда очень радуюсь, когда встречаю людей ответственных и образованных, которые не перестают учиться и повышать свой уровень знаний и профессионализма. Это касается всех и особенно докторов. Я люблю, когда вижу, что у человека есть призвание и он любит, то чем занимается. И мне везет на таких людей ( или я очень избирательна (с), что скорее всего). Не так давно я познакомилась с доктором-косметологом @dr.morzhanae…
🥰24❤12👍8😍2❤🔥1
Моя героиня Маша!
❤40💘8🔥4❤🔥1🥰1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤18💘7👍4❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @AnnaNevskayaArt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@AnnaNevskayaArt named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AnnaNevskayaArt” (@AnnaNevskayaArt), 600 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AnnaNevskayaArt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.