2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 108–110 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 03:03
109
no change
10 Aug 2026, 15:01
109
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.2%
avg views ÷ 109 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.2
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
19 (7 August 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
440
Reactions total
14
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 41s
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4
28.6%
😱
3
21.4%
💔
2
14.3%
🔥
2
14.3%
😢
2
14.3%
👍
1
7.14%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🫣 VK начал формировать нейропрофили своих пользователей.
Анализируют действия каждого человека, который взаимодействует с ВКонтакте, VK Видео, VK Клипы и т.д., а потом составляют его цифровой портрет.
Учитывают лайки, комментарии, проведенное время и всё-всё-всё.
Лайкнул, прокомментировал — позволил ВК узнать себя лучше.
Еще один миллиард благополучно освоен.
@blokirovki_runeta
Ладно. Ещё кое что расскажу, а потом пойду видосики делать.
В среду я иду на Одиссею. Да на это я тоже решился. Я не раз слышал то, что его очень много хвалят. Причём во всех эпостасиях. Я признаться честно не люблю фильмы Нолана. Ну вот вообще не по мне. Но этот фильм так хвалят, что мне самому интересно чё так такое намудрили. В среду пойду смотрнть. А после подедюсь впечатлениями.
На этом всё. Пошёл я видосы дел…
Я не верю в то что говорю это, но я решился на то чтобы сходить в кино на Смешариков. На их прошлый мульт (Смешарики снимают кино) я не ходил. Так что это будет первое за долгое время, что я вообще смотрю по Смешарикам. Особенно если это на большом экране.
Я очень надеюсь на то, что это будет того стоить и я не пожалею об этом.
Чтож. Работа над видосами теперь точно начата и продолжена. Ситуация такая.
За прошедшее время я взвалил на себя ещё один реакт и разговорное видео. В этот раз с простым монтажом. Речь идёт о видео про колобка и паучка. Текст для видео кое как удалось записать. Сейчас буду монтировать аудио и приступлю к могтажу видео. Благо монтаж к нему очень простой.
Что до остального, то в течении этой недели я ну очень постара…
Ну и в догонку на ночь ещё одна новость. У моего видоса про Sonic Boom намечается продолжение. Ну квк продолжение. Разоворный видос в котором я хочу поставить точку в своём отношении к этому мультсериалу. И о том почему оно у меня такое.
Ради этого видео я не планирую пересматривать весь мультсериал (Морально я этого не выдержу). Максимум по 2 рандомные серии ч каждого сезона для общего понимания. Это не то видео …
Удивительно, но за вечер я смог написать почти всё, что я хотел сказать по этой ситуации. Днём само собой я перечитаю, отредактирую текст, дополню чем смогу и на днях озвучу его.
По итогу на следующей неделе от меня можно ждать аж 2 разговорных (промнжуточных) видео на основном и 2 реакции на реакционном канале. До возможного отьезда я очень постараюсь всё выпустить. .
На самом деле я не прочь высказаттся об этом в мини видео. Но без своей говорящей головы, а чисто голосом на фоне игры. По сути мне нежно обьединить все свои густые мысли в один общий поток впечатлений. Да эту тему уже все обсосали. Но почему бы не выразить асё всё это с позиции трезвых мыслей и адекватности ? Особенно учитывая то, чтл сам ыильм я уже смотрел. Что-то мне подсказывант, я это сделаю.
▶️ Без этого отменённого мультсериала могло бы не быть «Незнайки на Луне»
Впервые в сети — 4K-оцифровка пилотного эпизода проекта «Волик». Мультфильм создавался студией FAF Entertainment для зарубежного заказчика, поэтому он доступен только на английском языке. Планировалось выпустить 26 серий, но после завершения работы над пилотом полноценное производство так и не стартовало.
Если бы проект получил зелёный свет, …
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Animalogya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 472,586 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АНИМАЛОГИЯ” (@Animalogya), 109 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Animalogya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.