Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

تو بخوان " آنیل"

@Anilhastam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

120subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002505408933
TypeChannel
Username@Anilhastam
Description🚬من شب را می‌نویسم، صبح خودش اتفاق می‌افتد... لطفا آرام و با حوصله بخوانید، کلماتم درد می‌کنند هنوز! _راستی، بگذار منبع بماند، منبع نام من است.
CreatedBetween 1 February 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Anilhastam

Growth

1206 August 2026 — 120 subscribers9 August 2026 — 120 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 119–121 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 04:01120no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:45120first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.5%
avg views ÷ 120 subscribers
Avg views / post
96.6
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total483
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
12
Videos
2
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

71 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1825.4%
👎1318.3%
💔1216.9%
912.7%
👍912.7%
🕊912.7%
🐳11.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC61 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

اما اگر بَلدِمان باشید در میان اين لبخند های ساختگی روحِ تخریب شده مان را می‌بینید که به جسم جوانمان نمی آید :) _آنیل @Anilhastam 🪞 #تو_بخوان_آنیل

2🕊2

2 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC120 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

@Anilhastam ☕ #تو_بخوان_آنیل

1🕊1

1 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC68 viewsread 9 August 2026
File

کاش میدونستی به من چی میگذره روزایی که با تو بد تا می‌کنم :) @Anilhastam 🎵 #آنیل_پلی_لیست

1 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC69 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

اى لحظات خوش كه هنوز از راه نرسیده‌اید، آيا نمی‌شود راه كوتاه‌ترى در پیش بگیرید؟ قبل‌ از اینكه دل‌هایمان فرتوت شوند... @Anilhastam ☕ #تو_بخوان_آنیل

💔1🕊1

15 Jul 2026, 11:22 UTC165 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

@Anilhastam ☕ #تو_بخوان_آنیل

🕊1

8 Jul 2026, 20:13 UTC219 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

وای از جنوب غم دیده جنوب هم بخشی از "وطن" است به نقشه ایران که مسلط هستید ان شالله؟

💔7🕊1

8 Jul 2026, 19:53 UTC219 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

در من حرف هایی است که گفتنش را بلد نبودم واژه هاییست که غریب اند همه و همه اشک شدند، در خفقان شب بر روی گونه برق زدند و چه عزیز است سکوت چه رفیق است سکوت... _آنیل @Anilhastam🪞 #تو_بخوان_آنیل

💔4🕊1

4 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC247 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

" رَنج" در هر مقداری، محترمه! ما اجازه نداریم آدم ها رو بر اساس شدت واکنش‌شون نسبت به یک غم، قضاوت و مَذمت کنیم. تفاوت آدم ها، در عمق کاسهء صبرشون هستش! یک نفر داغ می‌بینه و دِق می‌کنه یک نفر هم داغ می‌بینه و دوام میاره... آدم ها حق دارن برای یک خراش سطحی گریه کنن و ما نباید بهشون حسِ ضعیف بودن، بدیم. نباید بگیم: نگاه کن! فلانی دست و پاهاش قطع شده اما هیچی نمیگه، بعد تو برای یه خراش انقدر گریه میکنی! نه، هیچ کسی از ا

🕊2

1 Jul 2026, 18:24 UTC219 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

بله آقای ساعی ما همه مون می‌خواستیم یه چی غیر از این ببینیم...

1

1 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC217 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

به قول سینا ساعیِ عزیز: حالِ منم اونقدرا خوش نی لابد حالا فقط تو نیستی که بی پشتیبان افتادا منم مشغولِ کُشتی با بحرانام منم می‌خواستم یه چی غیر از این ببینم :) @Anilhastam ☕

3

25 Jun 2026, 12:02 UTC261 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @iRoChatBot

هنوووووز زنده‌ای حاجی؟

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Anilhastam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 223,344 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تو بخوان " آنیل"” (@Anilhastam), 120 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Anilhastam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.