Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Энᴇᴩᴦᴇᴛиᴋ Энᴦᴩиᴋᴀ <3

@Angrykcos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

99subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001800244110
TypeChannel
Username@Angrykcos
DescriptionА что говорить? Ну ху... канал по косплею
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Angrykcos

Growth

996 August 2026 — 99 subscribers9 August 2026 — 99 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 98–100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 11:0299no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:1899first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
118.9%
avg views ÷ 99 subscribers
Avg views / post
118
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total2,355
Reactions total134
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
754
Videos
251
Links
138

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

134 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥2518.7%
2014.9%
custom 52491611319723940301914.2%
custom 51972602403613726771813.4%
🔥1712.7%
custom 52378446147019393781410.4%
custom 5406802387539091034128.96%
🤗53.73%
😍21.49%
🤨10.746%
🥰10.746%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 01:54 UTC28 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3❤‍🔥1

Signed Angryk_Who

8 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC42 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥3❤‍🔥1

Signed Angryk_Who

4 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC95 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ебать, вас 100 ❤

🔥63custom 52491611319723940303

2 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC199 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🌟🦇💐🦇🦇🤩💐🫗 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 ➖➖➖➖➖ Что он скрывается за этой тяжёлой маской? Может быть ужасные шрамы? Или же свою уязвимость? Ведь Готэм не место для слабаков, ведь так?  Бэтси) 🌟 Кошка 🤩 #catwoman #женщинакошка #batcat #dc

custom 52491611319723940309❤‍🔥8🤗5🤨1custom 54068023875390910341

2 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC111 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed Angryk_Who

1 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC115 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥3custom 54068023875390910342custom 52491611319723940301

Signed Angryk_Who

31 Jul 2026, 16:33 UTC119 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Чтобы вы не скучали, вот вам Фем Найтвинг😉 И скоро можете ждать кое-что вкусное 🤩 #dc

custom 52378446147019393786custom 51972602403613726773custom 54068023875390910342❤‍🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 17:43 UTC127 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! С кем из персонажей DC ты могла бы себя ассоциировать и почему? Сложный вопрос…наверное как не странно я ассоциирую себя с Диком Грейсоном(Найтвингом) и со Стефани Браун(Спойлер), в них обоих есть та эмоциональность, и позитив, который я вижу в себе, единственное я не экстраверт как они, но это мы опустим 📱 #анонимки.

4custom 52378446147019393782custom 52491611319723940302

28 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC120 viewsread 9 August 2026

А давайте может в анонимках поболтаем? Пока я занимаюсь своими делами🤘

28 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC122 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Мне тут приехал костюм на Селину Кайл🤩 Да есть что нужно подправить, но он всё равно достаточно хорош 🫲 #dc

custom 519726024036137267711🔥7❤‍🔥6😍2custom 52378446147019393781

27 Jul 2026, 20:39 UTC110 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Чёт я забыла выложить сегодня кое-что вкусное, поэтому ждите завтра вкуснятину 😏

4

25 Jul 2026, 14:07 UTC131 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥1🥰1custom 51972602403613726771custom 52378446147019393781custom 52491611319723940301custom 54068023875390910341

Signed Angryk_Who

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Angrykcos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 344,964 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Энᴇᴩᴦᴇᴛиᴋ Энᴦᴩиᴋᴀ <3” (@Angrykcos), 99 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Angrykcos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.