🦭 ✈️
custom 505774969960844632812custom 50668009394578404288custom 50646081739696390247

Channel
@Aneskee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
152subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003093441012 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Aneskee |
| Description | La mia famiglia sono i Sappy Seals🦭 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Aneskee |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 152 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:10 | 152 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
580 reactions across 19 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 140 | 24.1% | |
| ❤ | 109 | 18.8% | |
| ⚡ | 52 | 8.97% | |
| 👏 | 49 | 8.45% | |
| 🎄 | 28 | 4.83% | |
| custom 5264760470371328402 | 24 | 4.14% | |
| ❤🔥 | 24 | 4.14% | |
| custom 5057749699608446328 | 22 | 3.79% | |
| custom 5067090226980062697 | 18 | 3.10% | |
| custom 5064608173969639024 | 17 | 2.93% | |
| custom 5066800939457840428 | 16 | 2.76% | |
| custom 5066667310140360376 | 14 | 2.41% | |
| 🏆 | 12 | 2.07% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 2.07% | |
| custom 5068947426673427669 | 9 | 1.55% | |
| 😘 | 8 | 1.38% | |
| ☃ | 7 | 1.21% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.862% | |
| 🦄 | 4 | 0.69% | |
| custom 5053268944912123574 | 3 | 0.517% | |
| 6 further kinds | 7 | 1.21% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 580reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2025 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Aneskee. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 November 2025 to 27 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🦭 ✈️
custom 505774969960844632812custom 50668009394578404288custom 50646081739696390247
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 505774969960844632810custom 50689474266734276698custom 50668009394578404286custom 50532689449121235742custom 52647604703713284021
🐻MTONGA◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️ 😂Общественное настроение в $TON за последний месяц: Десятки новостных каналов разгоняют контент на любом небольшом движении рынка. Информационного шума становится настолько много, что большинство людей начинают кататься на этих эмоциональных качелях вместе с рынком. В итоге многие выходят из позиции, продавая всё, что набирали последний год, и даже то, во что ещё недавно сами в…
custom 506666731014036037614custom 526476047037132840211custom 506709022698006269710custom 50668009394578404282custom 50532689449121235741
😠Сохрани каждый свой $TON💎◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️ Данным постом я не хочу призывать к all-in в TON, как и не хочу призывать кого-либо продавать активы, подарки или другие ассеты внутри экосистемы. Я лишь хочу подсветить ситуацию, с которой каждый может столкнуться в будущем. Речь скорее про осознанность в тратах. Сейчас, пока TON относительно дешёвый, мы часто тратим его почти не задумываясь: на игры, лудку/казино, подарки, pf…
custom 526476047037132840212custom 506460817396963902410custom 50670902269800626978custom 50689474266734276691
😊Мне нравятся NFT стикеры. Я вижу здесь огромный потенциал, особенно замечаю любовь людей к качественным стикерам. Суммарно все стикерпаки, которыми я владею и которые созданы мною по Sappy Seals, имеют 20000+ использований за период в пол года – это огромная цифра. Причём распространение происходит за счёт чистой органики, чем приятнее ваш стикер, тем большее число людей будет хотеть им по настоящему владеть. Я не п…
❤22🔥16👏14
✈️Я пишу в этот канал только тогда, когда у меня есть что сказать, и только о том, что считаю важным. У меня нет цели заваливать вас ежедневным информационным шумом и пересказывать каждое мимолетное движение рынка. Такие новости умирают быстро, превращаясь в мусор уже на следующий день. Моя цель создавать иногда тот контент, который обладает долговечностью. Я хочу, чтобы многие эти мысли оставались актуальными и …
❤30❤🔥14🔥13🫡1
🫠Страх потери и желание стабильности в цифровых активах. Многие подсознательно ищут безопасность на рынке, пытаясь исключить даже умеренную волатильность. Они хотят создать иллюзию стабильности. Но по итогу периоды искусственного затишья всегда прерываются резкими скачками. Поскольку эти люди не привыкли к переменчивости, малейшее колебание цен наводит их на мысль об инсайдерской информации и страхе остаться тем, к…
❤18🔥10❤🔥7😱2
🤯Goodies vs Sticker Pack vs Elephant: Почему хейт мешает рынку? До сих пор я встречаю негатив по отношению к разным площадкам для стикеров. Бренды обвиняют в предательстве, А многие люди не понимают, почему выпускаются новые коллекции. Вам, скорее всего, знакомы эти темы, Вы могли видеть ярые обсуждения или сами задавались вопросом: А почему именно так?🧐 В заголовке я выделил три основные площадки. У всех свои плюс…
🔥25⚡15👏14
🎶LoFi Сохраняйте жизненный баланс 🦭 Избегайте информационного шума, которым вас перегружают новостные каналы. Ждём игру в духе Sappy-Тамагочи, чтобы ловить рыбу и воспитывать своего тюленя 😠 🐾 Больше мыслей о игре можно узнать здесь
🥰12❤10😘8🔥1
🖼Стикеры: что скрывает тишина В отсутствие громких новостей чувствуется потеря веры: многим кажется, что рынок $TON стикеров просто продолжает падать. Но я вижу другую картину, если смотреть не на эмоции, а на сухую статистику На канале уже есть пару постов, которые рекомендую перечитать, чтобы лучше понимать контекст: 🔗 стикеров будет всё больше 🔗 Все стикеры не вырастут, покупай то, что будет развиваться Ниже п…
🔥22⚡14👏13❤1
Sticker pack was burned by @whnws 🔥 Collection: Sappy Pack: Sappy Originals #244 (link) Total burned: 25 New supply: 1475
🔥7❤3👏3
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤4⚡2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Aneskee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 358,098 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Aneskee named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aneskee” (@Aneskee), 152 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aneskee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.