Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

AndreAI - Intelligence Finanziaria

@AndreAI_Official

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

927subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003720997822
TypeChannel
Username@AndreAI_Official
DescriptionCanale ufficiale di AndreAI. Filtriamo il rumore dei mercati. ⚠️NON SONO CONSIGLI FINANZIARI.
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/AndreAI_Official

Growth

9277 Aug 2026, 18:53 — 927 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 00:51 — 927 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:538 Aug 2026, 00:51
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 926–928 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 00:51927no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:53927first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.2%
avg views ÷ 927 subscribers
Avg views / post
447
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,358
Reactions total68
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
82
Videos
2
Links
110

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5038.8%
🔥1914.7%
🍌1511.6%
1410.9%
🤣64.65%
💩53.88%
💊43.10%
🤮43.10%
🕊32.33%
21.55%
👀21.55%
😱21.55%
🤔21.55%
🖕10.775%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC131 viewsread 8 August 2026

🔴Nuovo video online: https://youtu.be/-mOdWCWT6H8?si=uIf0iIDVSGddOD2c

6 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC220 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @barattolostorePhoto

🫙 Barattolo apre. Siamo Andrea e Alan, e ci siamo trovati su un'idea comune: vivere davvero nel Bitcoin standard, fare circolare Bitcoin, non solo custodirlo gelosamente comprando e vendendo in totale libertà. 🎯 Su Barattolo l'individuo è al centro, per tanto può scegliere di entrare tramite Telegram o Nostr. 🥇 Il primo mercatino in sats, sicuro, completamente italiano e decentralizzato 🔒 Gli scambi sono protetti

5 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC297 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚨 Tutti gridano al "nuovo scandalo Enron" per le Big Tech, ma la verità è molto più complessa. Ho analizzato a fondo la questione del presunto "debito nascosto" da migliaia di miliardi di dollari delle grandi aziende tecnologiche. Niente panico, ecco cosa sta succedendo davvero dietro le quinte: 📉 Nessuna frode criminale: Non siamo di fronte a una Enron 2.0. I debiti non sono "nascosti" illegalmente: si tratta per

👍9🤣3

5 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC325 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🛑nuovo video online :https://youtu.be/PlUGLQ-mcZY?is=PvfCEM6Bj6auL8Lb

5🍌2

4 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC333 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔴Nuovo Video RISERVATO AGLI ABBONATI Bitcoin-ON: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjw4HOrcKw4

🤮4🍌1

4 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC334 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔴Nuovo Video RISERVATO AGLI ABBONATI WARROOM: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLwV86S2nmY

🍌21👍1

2 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTC427 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ciao a tutti ragazzi! 🚨 Voglio ricordarvi una cosa importante: chi entra nella WAR ROOM ottiene automaticamente l'accesso anche a Bitcoin On, il nostro canale riservato interamente dedicato alla SPECULAZIONE su Bitcoin e Crypto. ⏳ Questa opportunità è attiva ancora per poco. Se volete fare il salto di qualità e ricevere analisi dettagliate e video riservati – con una copertura totale su Bitcoin, scenari macroeconom

🍌3

27 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC651 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔴 Nuovo video riservato: https://youtu.be/8vOPBQ9tXns?si=FDa-IZAcGhoGTNIy

25 Jul 2026, 09:51 UTC681 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Cosa ne pensi a riguardo?

  1. 🔴Hai ragione! È un'operazione per cancellare la nostra storia e la nostra identità. Non è un caso.90%
  2. 🟢Stai esagerando. Hanno scelto la natura perché è un tema neutro che non scontenta nessuno.10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC635 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

​E voi? Quale uccello avete votato per le nuove banconote in euro?😂 Vi dico la verità: io sono indignato. Qui non si tratta di "gusti estetici". Oltre a non condividere le dinamiche fiat togliere la nostra storia, i ponti e la nostra architettura per metterci dei generici volatili sembra una vera e propria mossa per cancellare l'identità e le radici europee. Sono l'unico a pensare che ci sia un'agenda precisa dietro

👍19🤔2

22 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC753 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🛑nuovo video online: https://youtu.be/GeNRbgg3frc?si=Mi-jKEvQk2i2Hqpx

👍6🍌2💩2😱2👀1

22 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC571 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🛑nuovo video online riservato agli abbonati warroom e bitcoin on:https://youtu.be/PxfLV9tP12Y?si=09kPmzZ6m6dOwTBs

2🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AndreAI_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jul 2026, 09:51 UTCAnonymous Poll79 voters

Cosa ne pensi a riguardo?

  1. 🔴Hai ragione! È un'operazione per cancellare la nostra storia e la nostra identità. Non è un caso.90%
  2. 🟢Stai esagerando. Hanno scelto la natura perché è un tema neutro che non scontenta nessuno.10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AndreAI - Intelligence Finanziaria” (@AndreAI_Official), 927 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AndreAI_Official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.