Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Android Integrity Alliance - News

@AndIntAlliance

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

671subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002474213290
TypeChannel
Username@AndIntAlliance
Created22 November 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AndIntAlliance

Growth

6716 Aug 2026, 19:31 — 671 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:05 — 671 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:317 Aug 2026, 13:05
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 670–672 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 13:05671no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:31671first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 22 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

397 reactions across 7 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 521323623880223724715940.1%
custom 521313215026981934411027.7%
custom 5213175374820685297379.32%
❤307.56%
🔥256.30%
custom 5213270989382629822112.77%
custom 5213049377660090173102.52%
🖕51.26%
👍30.756%
custom 521535565913392443520.504%
custom 521311793392807040410.252%
👏10.252%
👨‍💻10.252%
😢10.252%
🥰10.252%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 397reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2024 to 27 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2025, 18:52 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @techleakszonePhoto

BREAKING: EU age verification app to ban any Android system not licensed by Google Reddit The EU is currently developing a whitelabel app to perform privacy-preserving (at least in theory) age verification to be adopted and personalized in the coming months by member states. The app is open source and available here: https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/av-app-android-wallet-ui. Problem is, the app is plan…

5 Feb 2025, 11:50 UTCviews —

Android Integrity Alliance - News pinned «If you’re interested in reviving this project and taking over my role, or you know someone that could, please reach out via email at me@alph4.eu.org or message @Alph4 on Telegram. Requirements: Must be based in the European Union. Must have enough free time…»

5 Feb 2025, 11:50 UTC≈2,750 viewsread 6 August 2026

If you’re interested in reviving this project and taking over my role, or you know someone that could, please reach out via email at me@alph4.eu.org or message @Alph4 on Telegram. Requirements: Must be based in the European Union. Must have enough free time to manage the project, seek new team members etc.

3 Dec 2024, 18:59 UTC≈32,200 views136 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🚨 Major Changes to Google Play Integrity Incoming! 🚨 Google has just announced upcoming updates to the Play Integrity API that will make it significantly harder to bypass its restrictions. These changes are set to roll out soon, and they threaten to make life even more difficult for custom ROM users, developers, and privacy-focused device manufacturers. What does this mean? - Custom ROM users will face even stricte…

custom 521323623880223724798custom 521313215026981934433custom 52132709893826298225

1 Dec 2024, 16:19 UTC≈17,700 views87 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Sorry for being silent! Looks like Google is making some changes to Play Integrity, that might make bypassing the system even more difficult. Bypassing is the last resort for people that can't access essential services, but we don't condone doing so. At some point in time, they will probably force Remote Key Provisioning too. Our team is still working on other sides along with the petition. We are in the process of …

custom 521313215026981934461custom 521323623880223724720custom 52132709893826298226

24 Nov 2024, 16:11 UTC≈3,810 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Oh. One more thing? We're ready to open the doors on our Discord server! But watch your step, it's still partially under construction. 😅 https://discord.gg/androidintegrity NOTE: WE ARE NOT ABANDONING TELEGRAM! BOTH GROUPS WILL BE OPERATED INDEFINITELY!!

custom 521323623880223724721custom 52131321502698193449custom 52153556591339244352

24 Nov 2024, 15:23 UTC≈3,320 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026

👨‍🔧 We still want you! Another call for applicants to our team! We have been really motivated by the energy around this whole thing, everyone. We are so excited that so many passionate, intelligent people care about what is going on. We really hope that we can work on something big here, guys. We want to provide solutions, and we need innovative minds to design those solutions alongside us. What skills you could pro…

custom 521323623880223724715custom 52130493776600901738custom 52131753748206852972

23 Nov 2024, 16:26 UTC≈2,750 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📣 Exciting Update from the Android Integrity Alliance! What started as a petition has quickly grown into a movement! The Android Integrity Alliance (AIA) is taking steps forward to forming as an international non-profit organization to advocate for the future of open-source Android. We're building a team of passionate individuals dedicated to protecting AOSP and ensuring it remains independent of Play Services. Our…

custom 521317537482068529732custom 52132362388022372475custom 52131321502698193443custom 52130493776600901732

22 Nov 2024, 18:53 UTC≈2,370 views47 reactionsread 6 August 2026

As we approach the incredible milestone of 5,000 signatures, we’re thrilled to share some behind-the-scenes progress! 🎯 ✨ A huge shoutout to @XelXen for designing our stunning new logo 🚀 We’re also hard at work building a website to serve as our central hub. Alongside this, we’re refining our tone and approach to ensure our message is stronger than ever. Stay tuned—big things are coming, and we couldn’t have done …

❤26🔥6🖕5custom 52131321502698193444custom 52131753748206852973👏1👨‍💻1custom 52131179339280704041

22 Nov 2024, 10:41 UTC≈3,720 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

✨ Important Community Announcement ✨ We're excited to announce the evolution of our community into the Android Integrity Alliance! This change signifies our commitment to fostering a professional and collaborative environment where we can advocate for the recognition and improvement of Android's open-source ecosystem. Our Core Focus: * Promoting Openness: We believe in the power of open-source software and its …

🔥19❤4👍3🥰1😢1

22 Nov 2024, 09:32 UTC≈1,660 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

The chat group is now located at @AndIntAllianceChat

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @AndIntAlliance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 185,336 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Tech & Leaks Zone
@techleakszone · 19,5911 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Android Integrity Alliance
@fuckgoogleint · 951 postZaid Sweet-Lisa Builds | Updates
@zaidupdate · 4471 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Tech & Leaks Zone
@techleakszone · 19,5911 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Android Integrity Alliance - News” (@AndIntAlliance), 671 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AndIntAlliance.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.