Channel
@Anabesh11
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,919subscribers
-192 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001531915082 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Anabesh11 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Anabesh11 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 14:12 | 5,919 | -5 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:28 | 5,924 | -4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 02:29 | 5,928 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:20 | 5,929 | +1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:58 | 5,928 | -9 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:49 | 5,937 | -13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:19 | 5,950 | -3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:15 | 5,953 | -10 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 05:46 | 5,963 | -20 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:27 | 5,983 | -11 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 06:37 | 5,994 | -9 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 6,003 | -12 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 22:56 | 6,015 | -13 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 6,028 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 6,030 | -10 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 6,040 | -18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:04 | 6,058 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 6,066 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 6,071 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 6,079 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (4 August 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 10,575 |
| Reactions total | 193 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 01:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
456 reactions across 40 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 456 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 456 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (40.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💡 • لاحظ أن عندك في يومك عملاً تؤجله لأنك تنتظر [ المزاج ] وآخر تنجزه رغمًا عنك، والعجيب أن الذي تُنجزه مكرهًا يمضي، والذي تنتظر له المزاج يبقى معلقاً شهورًا. فلا تجعل المزاج هو المسيطر عليك في تأدية مهامك؛ فالمهمة التي تبدأ بها، تُقبل عليها نفسك . -
❤10
- صباح الخير. ☀️ لا تنتظر أن يصفو لك الوقتُ كله حتى تبدأ؛ فما صفا وقتٌ لأحدٍ قط، ولن تجد يومًا فارغًا تُفرّغه لما تريد، إنما تجد ساعةً تقتطعها اقتطاعًا. لذا اعمل وادرس في وقتٍ ضيق، خيرٌ من أن تحلم بوقتٍ واسعٍ لا يجيء. -
❤17
• ومهما تكن عند امرئٍ من خليقةٍ وإن خالها تخفى على الناس تُعلَمِ ختم بها زهير حِكَم معلقته، وهي من أصدق ما قالته العرب في الطبع والتكلف، فالتصنع ثوبٌ مستعار ينكشف عند أول امتحان، وما ستره المرء دهرًا تفضحه لحظةُ غضب أو طمع، فإصلاح الباطن أهون من حراسة الظاهر. -
❤11
• يقول الشاعر فهد الصميدي : أحدٍ أجيه أضيّع الوقت وياه وأحدٍ ليا ضيّعني الوقت جيته -
❤13
صباح الخير. ☀️ • تسعةُ أعشار حُسن الخُلق في التغافل، كما قال الإمام أحمد، وأكثرُ ما يُنغص عيشنا ليس كبائرَ الأمور، بل صغائرُها التي نُكبّرها بطول التأمل فيها؛ كلمةٌ عابرة، أو نظرةٌ حُملت ما لا تحتمل. فتغافلْ عمّا لا يمس دينك ولا كرامتك، تجد يومك أخف، وقلبك أصفى. -
❤16
شكراً لكم ودمتم بخير . 💐♥️
❤13
انتهى مجلس الليلة، ولعلي أعود إليكم بموضوع جديد هاليومين . 😂👍🏻
❤14
= فشعرتُ بالدم يعود إلى وجهي، وتذكرت أنني أنا الذي قلتُ له فعلًا: اتبعني، ولكني نسيتُ الرجل، ولم ينسَ هو وعدي وفزعتي، فاعتذرتُ منه كثيراً وقلت: ـ آسف واعتذرت له بكل ما فتح لي من ألفاظ الاعتذار .. وما يدريه، فتلك الهموم وما تفعل .😂
❤10
= حاذاني الرجل، وكانت عيناه تتطايران شررًا، وقال: ـ تستهبل أنت؟ ألم أطلب منك أن تدلني على المحل الفلانيّ، فقلتَ لي: اتبعني؟ > أتخيل المشهد 😂
❤10
= لكن المشكلة أنني كنت قد ابتعدتُ عن منزلي كثيرًا، والسيارة لا تزال تطاردني، فبلغ مني اليأس مبلغه، وهدّأتُ السرعة تدريجيا حتى توقفت، ثم فتحتُ نافذتي وأنا صامتٌ ساكن.
❤8
= اتصلتُ بأمي وقلت لها: أنا قادمٌ إلى البيت بسرعة، فاجعلي أخي يفتح باب الكراج؛ أريد إدخال السيارة فورًا.
❤9
= فبدأتُ أدخل الحارات يمينًا ويسارًا، وصار يطاردني صراحةً، ولم يعد في قلبي مجالٌ للشك، ولم يبقَ إلا أن نصور المطاردة من طائرة هليكوبتر، كما يحدث في الأفلام الوثائقية عن مطاردات الشرطة في أمريكا. فقلت: بقيت الورقة الأخيرة.
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @Anabesh11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 10 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أنابيـش | عَبدالرحمن” (@Anabesh11), 5,919 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Anabesh11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.