Channel

Anabel Schunke - Freie Journalistin, Autorin - Model and Journalist from Germany.

@AnabelSchunke

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,006subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001424908191
Type	Channel
Username	@AnabelSchunke
Created	20 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded	8 August 2026
Last confirmed live	27 August 2026
Measurements held	7
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/AnabelSchunke

Growth

7 measurements spanning 20 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,005–1,013 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
27 Aug 2026, 11:55	1,006	-1
24 Aug 2026, 03:04	1,007	-2
20 Aug 2026, 01:23	1,009	-1
13 Aug 2026, 13:16	1,010	-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:33	1,011	no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:42	1,011	-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:46	1,012	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 July 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 January 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

4 Jan 2022, 11:27 UTC≈13,600 viewsread 8 August 2026

via Anabel Schunke https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5wrkpa7RUg

30 Nov 2021, 18:12 UTC≈15,100 viewsread 8 August 2026

In Niedersachsen gilt ab morgen 2G plus. Warum man, wenn man jetzt doch auch wieder Geimpfte und Genesene testet, die Ungeimpften weiter ausschließt, ist klar: Weil sonst immer mehr derjenigen, die sich nur geimpft haben, um den ganzen Schikanen zu entgehen, fragen, warum sie das eigentlich getan haben, wenn sie doch keinen Vorteil gegenüber Ungeimpften haben. Ein Impfstoff, der nicht gut wirkt, kommt gar nicht ohne …

5 Nov 2021, 13:17 UTC≈10,100 viewsread 8 August 2026

In Bad Rodach eskaliert eine Halloween-Party mit zwei Syrern. Mädchen werden sexuell belästigt, Baseballschläger werden eingesetzt. https://ift.tt/3bQ74KN via Anabel Schunke https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwqT-kuQusA

4 Jul 2021, 22:49 UTC≈14,600 viewsread 8 August 2026

Nie hätte ich gedacht, dass ich in Bezug auf solche Fälle wie denen in Hanau und #Würzburg dem Staat bewusste Verfälschung von Indizien unterstelle, die nicht ins Weltbild passen.— Anabel (@ainyrockstar) Jul 4, 2021 July 05, 2021 at 12:44AM via Twitter https://twitter.com/ainyrockstar

4 Jul 2021, 22:44 UTC≈12,800 viewsread 8 August 2026

(3/3) Wie immer werden die Opfer der Zuwanderung und des Islamismus vom Staat komplett im Stich gelassen. Nichts aus der Schande vom Breitscheidplatz gelernt, wo Opfer bis heute sogar das Taxi zum Therapeuten zahlen müssen. Deutsche Opfer sind hierzulande nichts wert.— Anabel (@ainyrockstar) Jul 4, 2021 July 05, 2021 at 12:40AM via Twitter https://twitter.com/ainyrockstar

4 Jul 2021, 22:44 UTC≈9,640 viewsread 8 August 2026

(2/3) der Opfer geflossen. Der Fall wurde trotz anderer Einschätzung des BKA (die dann auf Druck geändert werden musste) zum Rechtsterrorismus erklärt. In #Würzburg hält man indes, trotz klaren Hinweisen auf ein islam. Motiv an der psychischen Erkrankung fest, um nicht zahlen zu— Anabel (@ainyrockstar) Jul 4, 2021 July 05, 2021 at 12:40AM via Twitter https://twitter.com/ainyrockstar

4 Jul 2021, 22:44 UTC≈7,740 viewsread 8 August 2026

(1/3)Beim Täter von Hanau sind, trotz dessen, dass der Täter Tobias R. klar an einer paranoiden Schizophrenie litt und durch die gezielte Tötung von Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund Aufmerksamkeit für seine Schwachsinnstheorien generieren wollte, Millionen an die Familien— Anabel (@ainyrockstar) Jul 4, 2021 July 05, 2021 at 12:40AM via Twitter https://twitter.com/ainyrockstar

4 Jul 2021, 22:34 UTC≈5,990 viewsread 8 August 2026

Eine einzige Schande! https://t.co/cJGZ3aLzAE— Anabel (@ainyrockstar) Jul 4, 2021 July 05, 2021 at 12:32AM via Twitter https://twitter.com/ainyrockstar

4 Jul 2021, 16:54 UTC≈5,670 viewsread 8 August 2026

@ronzheimer @FranziskaGiffey Ein solcher Abschiebestopp hat verhindert, dass der islamistische Gefährder, der das homosexuelle Pärchen in Dresden attackiert und einen der Männer getötet hat, abgeschoben werden konnte. Sind Sie auch bei diesen Gefährdern gegen Abschiebungen nach Syrien?— Anabel (@ainyrockstar) Jul 4, 2021 July 04, 2021 at 06:51PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/ainyrockstar

4 Jul 2021, 16:49 UTC≈4,810 viewsread 8 August 2026

Da ist er nicht der erste, der wegen des Geldes umgebracht wird. Das tun Deutschen tatsächlich ebenso. Und ich muss ganz ehrlich sagen: Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. https://t.co/OxJMYXbpWX— Anabel (@ainyrockstar) Jul 4, 2021 July 04, 2021 at 06:48PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/ainyrockstar

4 Jul 2021, 16:49 UTC≈4,420 viewsread 8 August 2026

@atroxfm @Musketler Gibt es da eine Meldung zu?— Anabel (@ainyrockstar) Jul 4, 2021 July 04, 2021 at 06:41PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/ainyrockstar

4 Jul 2021, 16:34 UTC≈4,120 viewsread 8 August 2026

Und in #Stuttgart trafen sich gestern Abend auch wieder die üblichen Verdächtigen zu einem intensiven Austausch unter #Astrophysikern https://t.co/ruh40eRZFb— Anabel (@ainyrockstar) Jul 4, 2021 July 04, 2021 at 06:32PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/ainyrockstar

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AnabelSchunke. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 927,866 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Kampf für unsere Zukunft ❣️
@Kampf_fuer_unsere_Zukunft · 49,6092 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Handles this channel named that no longer answer

Dead references: 6; handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone: 0; we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive: 6; vacant every time we have ever looked

@AnabelSchunke named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.

Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.

Never seen alive

References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.

@ainyrockstar
named in 17 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

@atroxfm
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

@denizyokevde
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

@franziskagiffey
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

@musketler
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

@ronzheimer
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Anabel Schunke - Freie Journalistin, Autorin - Model and Journalist from Germany.” (@AnabelSchunke), 1,006 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AnabelSchunke.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.