Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 785–828 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 18:37
790
-9
26 Aug 2026, 20:36
799
-11
19 Aug 2026, 17:41
810
-7
13 Aug 2026, 01:36
817
-5
6 Aug 2026, 19:34
822
-1
6 Aug 2026, 15:18
823
no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:51
823
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
143 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
49
34.3%
❤
47
32.9%
👍
28
19.6%
💯
8
5.59%
👏
5
3.50%
😱
5
3.50%
😁
1
0.699%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 23 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ushbu loyihaning mohiyatini ko'pchilik sezmayapti. Agar loyiha shunday qabul qilinsa, Vatanimiz tarixi fanimiz rostdan "tarixga kiradi". 7-8 kun vaqt qoldi. O'z fikringizni saytdan ro'yhatdan o'tib, muhokama qismiga qoldiring va ko'chilik tarix fani ustozlariga yetkazing.
Ilojingiz va imkoniyatingiz bo'lsa, TA'SIRI MAVJUD INSONLARGA HAM yetkazing. To'g'ri bizning fikr ahamiyatsiz bo'lishi mumkin, lekin hech bo'lma…
"Ўқувчиларни қобилияти ва танловига қараб касбий ёки олий таълимга йўналтириш бўйича ягона давлат имтиҳонлари тизимини жорий этиш тўғрисида" hujjat loyihasini ko'pchilik ko'rdi.
30-aprelgacha muhokamada turar ekan. O'z fikrimni qoldirdim. Tarixchilarni o'z fikrlarini bildirishga chorlab qolaman.
https://regulation.adliya.uz/project/9359/27637?contentLang=oz
#Attestatsiya
2026-yil apreldagi attestatsiya testiga kirib testni yechib chiqqan mutaxassis sifatida fikr bildirsam.
Test savollari menga yoqdi. Oldingi imtihonlarning qaysidirida o'qituvchini "sindirish" uchun xaritadan olingan yo judayam maydalashib ketgan holatda savollar bo'lar edi. Bu safar darajasi yaxshi, ustunlik tomoni mantiqiylikka ko'proq urg'u berilgan. Axir ustoz faqat yodlab emas, mantiqiy fikrlab t…
#Attestatsiya
1) 2024-yil kuz: mutaxassislikdan 2-toifaga o'tdim - 90 ball;
2) 2025-yil bahor: 2-toifadan 1-toifaga o'tdim - 92 ball;
3) 2026-yil bahor: 1-toifadan Oliy toifaga o'tdim - 88 ball.
3 harakatda Oliy toifali bo'ldim. Kamina endi Oliy toifali o'qituvchi😎
1- va 2-imtihonlarda uzog'i bir yo ikki kun 5-6 soatdan tayyorgarlik ko'rib testga kirgan edim, natija yaxshi bo'ldi. 3-sida tayyorgarlik uchun vaqt…
Bugun bo'yicha oxirgi post:
Kuzdagi sertifikat imtihoniga kiruvchilar diqqatiga:
@Tarixpediya kanalimdagi 150 ta viktorinani va ushbu @Amirov0215_tarix kanalimdagi ma'lumotlarni
2025-yil 31-dekabrdan buyog'iga joylangan har bir postni diqqat bilan yodlab oling.
Har bir joylagan ma'lumotim sertifikat imtihonida tushish ehtimoli juda yuqori bo'ladi. Qaysidir sertifikat imtihonida tushib beradi.
Kanallarni yuritib …
Bu postda bir ro'yhatni 7-mart kuni joylagan edim.
Bugun 2 tasi tushibdi. Vaqtida jimgina joylangan postni jimgina yodlab qo‘yish kerak edi...
https://t.me/Amirov0215_tarix/4834
#Diqqat
#Qabul
TARIX va HUQUQSHUNOSLIK fanlaridan 2026-yil iyul oyidagi DTM va 2026-yil 2-yarim yillikdagi Milliy sertifikat imtihonlariga abituriyentlarni tayyorgarlik kursiga qabul qilamiz. [ Toshkent shahridagi 9-10-sinflar uchun ayni muddao]
Manzil: Toshkent shahar Chilonzor tumani Mirzo Ulug'bek metrosi yonida.
Murojaat: 👇
@Amirov0215
+99890-900-75-40
@Amirov0215_tarix
@Tarixpediya kanalimdagi bazaku alohida masala! O'z oldida oqqan suvning qadri yo'q deyishadi. Atiga 150 ta test tuzdim. Bazi dangasa o'quvchilarim yodlab chiqishga erinishdi.
Ko'pchilik muallifni saqlamay foydalanishganiga qo'lim bormay tashlab qo'ygan edim. O'sha Sharik haqidagi testlar ham noutbukimda faylda qolib ketdi...
Lekin hali o'sha uslubimda davom etaman. Baribir davom etaman!
9-savol
2024-yil oktyabr oyida tuzgan testim. Bugunga nasib qilibdi bu ham.
Ha, endi maqtanib quyaydaa))
Faqat o'quv markazida dars o'taman. Deyarli har bir darslik bo'yicha milliy sertifikat testlarini abituriyentlarimga yechtirib chiqarganman.
Yil davomida o'qigan o'quvchilarim testlarimdan eplagani foydalanishdi, foydalanishmaganini bilmadim....
❤10👍4
Signed O'rolbek Amirov
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Amirov0215_tarix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
#TARIX N-54
1831-yilda Fransiyaning qaysi shahrida to'quvchilar qo'zg'olon ko'tarib, o'z bayroqlariga "Ishlab yashaylik yoki jang qilib o'laylik" deb yozishgan edi?
Lion49%
Gras16%
Strasburg27%
Sent-Etyen7%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 23 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“O'rol Amirov” (@Amirov0215_tarix), 790 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Amirov0215_tarix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
