Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Шерáн || ॐ

@AminaSheran

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

148subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001884945831
TypeChannel
Username@AminaSheran
DescriptionПишу, читаю, размышляю, шучу. @pnkhw
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/AminaSheran

Growth

1488 Aug 2026, 12:32 — 148 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 20:17 — 148 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 12:328 Aug 2026, 20:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 147–149 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 20:17148no change
8 Aug 2026, 12:32148first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.4%
avg views ÷ 148 subscribers
Avg views / post
40.5
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
23.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held12 (14 June 202623 July 2026)
Views total243
Reactions total58
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
279
Videos
6
Links
69

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

108 reactions across 11 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5147.2%
😁2321.3%
🔥109.26%
🥰87.41%
❤‍🔥54.63%
👍32.78%
👻21.85%
🤗21.85%
10.926%
🍾10.926%
🐳10.926%
🤓10.926%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 17:06 UTC29 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

(тут только часть котиков, которых я сегодня поймала)

🥰52🤗2

20 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC48 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ко мне щас подошел мужик (где-то 50+) и спросил почему у меня такой красивый и сияющий тон и «что я мажу на лицо» 🙏🏻не думала что единственный человек который заметит мои старания над кожей будет рандом 50 летний мужик 🥀

😁8

18 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC46 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ничего, кроме агрессии к людям, которые выливают на себя полфлакона, еще и в такую ЖАРУ, я не испытываю. Я воспринимаю это как пассивно-агрессивное воздействие на свое здоровье, ведь любой человек, который может хотя бы немножко думать, понимает, что его аромат может вызвать у кого-то головную боль или тошноту. И еще я не понимаю: на самом ли деле такие люди чувствуют себя более ухоженными, когда обливаются флаконом?

😁63🔥3❤‍🔥1🍾1

18 Jul 2026, 07:18 UTC38 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В детстве на пляже я нашла ракушку и прижала её к уху — Так классно слышать море, — сказала я девочке постарше. — Вообще-то, ты слышишь, как течет твоя собственная кровь, — хмуро ответила она, пытаясь развеять мою иллюзию. Я замерла, но после вместо разочарования меня накрыло звенящее восхищение. Осознание того, что внутри меня, оказывается, безостановочно шумит море.

6❤‍🔥4👍2🐳1🔥1

16 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC43 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нашла такую нишевую соц сеть. Сижу пару дней. Очень нравится. Есть атмосфера старого интернета. Я такое очень люблю. Советую скачать! Если что мой профиль: https://fablet.app/user/12337 P.S. регестрироваться лучше через Яндекс почту. Другая не подойдет.

6🔥21👍1

30 Jun 2026, 16:56 UTC67 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ЧЕРНЫЙ АНГЕЛ В САДУ Из мира «Сада земных наслаждений» I Туман густел, как ртутный пар, Он резал крыльями пространство. Костяшки — лезвия; удар — И в гордом, злом самозванстве Он правил высью, точно царь. Как плоть кромсает грешных тварей, Так он кроил небес нагар В своем безумном лупанарии. II Там, в ржавой яме, стон и скрип, Кандальный лязг и визг недужный. Он думал: «Человек прилип К своей вине ему ненужной. Стр

6🔥1🤓1

22 Jun 2026, 15:59 UTC326 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Следующей книгой в цикле чтения оказалось «Безупречная тирания» Елены Змеевой. И я готова поделиться впечатлением после прочтения первой части! На этот раз я начну с названия книги. Оно цепляющее, намекающее на настроение книги. Такое мне нравится. Уже с первых строк пролога видно, что мы читаем автора с опытом, который знает жанр, в котором пишет. Здесь сразу чувствуется, что автор лепит свой фэнтези мир со вкусом

7🥰3🔥2

21 Jun 2026, 16:30 UTC48 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Природа ветра постоянно вездесуща, и поэтому в целом мире нет места, не охваченного им. А если это так, почему же ты пользуешься веером?» Маёку ответил: «То, что ты знаешь, есть лишь теория о том, что ветер рассеян по всему миру». Монах вопросил: «Тогда где же настоящее значение ветра, рассеянного по миру?» Мастер лишь продолжал обмахивать себя веером. Монах почтительно поклонился и ушел. Догэн Дзэндзи, «Сёбогэ

5🔥1

16 Jun 2026, 18:17 UTC66 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Опять гиперфикс на истории Монголии 🚬

😁92👻2

14 Jun 2026, 17:28 UTC76 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Восхищена ее красотой 🙏🏻 Вошла в мой личный список самых красивых женщин «Госпожа Кровавый Снег», Мэико Кадзи

11

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @AminaSheran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 954,481 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шерáн || ॐ” (@AminaSheran), 148 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AminaSheran.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.