Channel
@Amagi_san
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
143subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001923855486 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Amagi_san |
| Description | Привет, я Амаги, или проще Ами Тут я публикую косплей и не только Рада встречи и общению °˖✧◝(⁰▿⁰)◜✧˖° |
| Created | 11 May 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Amagi_san |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 143 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 143 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (29 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,033 |
| Reactions total | 99 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
99 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5339314746078276018 | 22 | 22.2% | |
| custom 5269655796785881579 | 20 | 20.2% | |
| custom 5253592086522904820 | 10 | 10.1% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5274143784207129919 | 9 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5294435447391404201 | 7 | 7.07% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 6.06% | |
| custom 5276316569507470415 | 5 | 5.05% | |
| custom 5253640104257273330 | 3 | 3.03% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 2.02% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 2.02% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 1.01% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.01% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.01% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В общем, я наконец примерил платья И пришла к выводу, что первое мне менее жалко переделывать и больше подходить под задумку В второе само по себе хорошо, хотя боже есть потенциал стилизовать
custom 52696557967858815794custom 53393147460782760183custom 52741437842071299192
Только разобрала наконец сумку с Фэнтези Фест У меня было не много денег на спонтанные траты, но я себе позволила маленькую радость - сама отчеканила монету кувалдой
custom 52696557967858815794custom 52741437842071299191custom 53393147460782760181
После очередного рабочего дня с температурой - возвращается вайб
custom 52944354473914042015
После долгого сна, я поняла, что мне не нравится тот косплей, что я сейчас делаю. Будет рубрика - продам шкаф 🤭 Почему же? Я слишком сильно изменилась, и продолжаю меняться, и те планы что я строила - я переросла. Мне больше в тягость работать, нежели чем я занимаюсь работой Когда я горю костюмом - я готова просто без остановки в любую минуту над ним сидеть Из очевидного - я больше не хочу их одевать и отыгрывать …
custom 53393147460782760183custom 52696557967858815792custom 52741437842071299191
Вспомнила я тут, что меня позвали на Вампирский Бал 🌕 Так вот, раз я всё равно сейчас в отдыхе от косплея (ибо чувствую что выгорю), займусь стилизацией платья 💃 У меня с прошлого года висят куча платьев, что мне отдала подруга, но они прям для мероприятий, и немного не в моём стиле (очень уж строгие) Пока на скорую руку набросала, что я хочу видеть и воплотить:
custom 52696557967858815793custom 53393147460782760182custom 52741437842071299191
Тема: Кинк 🔞🌹 Перехожу в формат комментариев
custom 52741437842071299194custom 53393147460782760183custom 52696557967858815792
Я заболела, видимо всё же марафон выбил организм из строя, так что пока на чилле буду
custom 52763165695074704152custom 52944354473914042011custom 53393147460782760181
Posted without readable text
custom 53393147460782760183custom 52696557967858815791custom 52763165695074704151
Из весёлого: Вчера я пыталась выпросить себе в подарок кованный меч, как пикми-няшка Нет мне не стыдно х) Зато взяла контакт мастера
custom 53393147460782760184custom 52696557967858815792custom 52763165695074704152
Posted without readable text
❤4custom 52696557967858815792custom 53393147460782760182custom 52944354473914042011
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥5🍓2custom 52535920865229048202
Пхпхпх И тут хср
custom 52535920865229048204❤2custom 52536401042572733301
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Amagi_san. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 926,575 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✨🍓Небесный Замок🍓✨” (@Amagi_san), 143 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Amagi_san.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.