Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

AluMiNi-Art (18+)

@AluZu_Mi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

86subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002380282943
TypeChannel
Username@AluZu_Mi
DescriptionДа, я рисую порно. Нет, мне не стыдно. Лс: @AluZuMi
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/AluZu_Mi

Growth

867 August 2026 — 86 subscribers9 August 2026 — 86 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85–87 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 16:3286no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:4186first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 9 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
136.8%
avg views ÷ 86 subscribers
Avg views / post
118
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held16 (9 May 20262 August 2026)
Views total353
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
353
Videos
22
Links
17

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

120 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 60215737799713784823327.5%
custom 53236683305428133122420.0%
🔥2016.7%
custom 54024835058651712901210.0%
custom 521553917449654667597.50%
custom 536861949262247713386.67%
custom 526522605341613652565.00%
custom 602169115713261060543.33%
custom 521755927800449310132.50%
custom 535268838947476026510.833%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 16 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AluZu_Mi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 May 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC91 views4 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥2custom 53236683305428133121custom 60215737799713784821

23 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC121 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вы все геи что ли..я а я не гей…

custom 54024835058651712904custom 53686194926224771331

20 Jul 2026, 10:07 UTC141 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Не спрашивайте, как я докатилась до такого… 😔 Мне нравится 😂 #Sketch

custom 60215737799713784825🔥1custom 52155391744965466751

12 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC200 views9 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Наконец, держите полноценную версию этой работы. Получилось довольно мило😂 #Oc #V_A #Art

🔥6custom 52175592780044931011custom 53236683305428133121custom 60215737799713784821

7 Jul 2026, 13:47 UTC158 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54024835058651712902custom 60215737799713784821

4 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTC183 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Скоро будет полноценный артик с этой прекрасной леди 🥰 Пока не могу рисовать, но кое-что сохранила для вас, чтобы порадовать 🥺 Как у вас дела? #Sketch #V_A #Oc

custom 60215737799713784826custom 53236683305428133121

30 Jun 2026, 14:45 UTC161 views8 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Моменты из видео, забыла скинуть 😂 #Sketch #Art

custom 60215737799713784824custom 53236683305428133122custom 60216911571326106052

24 Jun 2026, 20:28 UTC200 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Заказ готов! 🌟 ▶️Небольшая полноценочка, созданная для аватарки канала. ❤️ Давненько не рисовала, так что результат вышел чуток хуже чем ожидала. Но ничего, все равно вышло ведь не плохо, да? Вотермарка для защиты💬 #Art

custom 53236683305428133126🔥3custom 52652260534161365252custom 52155391744965466751custom 60215737799713784821custom 60216911571326106051

24 Jun 2026, 16:37 UTC154 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Извините, я не могла не сделать этого 🙂 #LPS #Video

custom 54024835058651712903custom 52155391744965466752custom 60215737799713784822

23 Jun 2026, 20:16 UTC153 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

У меня наконец-то появилась возможность рисовать, и я тут же принялась за работу! 🥺 Сделала для вас скетчик, это небольшой тренд который я увидела в пинтересте #Oc #V_A #Sketch

custom 60215737799713784824custom 52175592780044931012custom 53236683305428133122

12 Jun 2026, 16:19 UTC187 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Пока я не могу рисовать, посмотрите на то, что мне нарисовали😇 Ну какая же ляпота, мне очень нравится 🤭 Спасибо огромное, я безумно рада 🩵 #Oc #Art

custom 52155391744965466755🔥3custom 60215737799713784822

25 May 2026, 18:41 UTC204 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

История: Идем с сестрой в гипермаркет, в часе ходьбы от дома. Все было хорошо, купили мороженое, кушали на лавочке, смеялись. Напротив сидел парень, постоянно смотрел на нас, нам стало не по себе и мы пошли к дому. Первый поворот: он за нами. Второй: он все еще идет, мы уже немного паникуем. Решили перейти дорогу, вроде оторвались, я сажусь на лавочку, ибо натерли ноги, хочу пластырь приклеить. Вижу: он делает вид ч

custom 53686194926224771337custom 54024835058651712903🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @AluZu_Mi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 736,824 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AluMiNi-Art (18+)” (@AluZu_Mi), 86 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AluZu_Mi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.