Saw this getting some traction these past few days; $GC | GlobalCoin. There is some hype around the teamlead and this previous exploits so this is likely bound for a bumpy ride. Risky play, but lets see what he has in store for us🤞. CA: 0x7815475f3a4860ff5384055bd0e81e55901b8ad7 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x494d695498ddac073a66cc81eb72f1ec7ef408bfb1579d0cd13cf59c589ce127 #DYOR #RobinHoodChain

Channel
🚀 Alt Crypto Gems 💎
@Alt_Crypto_Gems
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,297subscribers
-529 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001204206088 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Alt_Crypto_Gems |
| Description | The official Telegram channel of x.com/AltCryptoGems! Join the movement 👇🏼 DM for any business enquiries: @OfficiaLALTCryptoGems All links: linktr.ee/altcryptogems *Watch our Altcoin Podcast: Youtube.com/@AltCryptoCast |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Alt_Crypto_Gems |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 07:59 | 10,297 | -13 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 21:21 | 10,310 | -5 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 18:00 | 10,315 | -15 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:46 | 10,330 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:58 | 10,335 | -12 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:21 | 10,347 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:41 | 10,354 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:36 | 10,361 | -11 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 10,372 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 16:45 | 10,376 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:11 | 10,383 | -9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 10,392 | -7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:25 | 10,399 | -7 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:04 | 10,406 | -4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 10,410 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:21 | 10,413 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:09 | 10,414 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:55 | 10,416 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:14 | 10,426 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 10,428 | first reading |
Engagement
86 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.9%
- avg views ÷ 10,297 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,740
- 25 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.037%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 25
- of 86 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 86 (15 July 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 43,523 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 21:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,950
- Videos
- ≈248
- Links
- ≈6,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 14s
- Average length
- 25s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 55.6% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 38.9% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 1.16%
- 1 of 86 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 0
- none — marked by hashtag only
- Median views · ads
- 1,800
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 1,990
- over 85 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (4.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Another one of those weekends with hefty dips, lot of them worth picking up. I see a pretty decent entry for $FOREVER | Forever here. They aim to build the framework for an autonomous economy, which sounds interesting enough🧐. CA: 0xaCC8De336F5D2366FA7334383D8FaB73499F582A https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x5132006c8312109dfbde5fd6364aba8c52bdfb99c75f93e820c599ce5cf2edb0 #DYOR #RobinHoodChain
Another one that saw some decent action yesterday due to a Vlad interaction was $BROW | eyebrow. It launched back in July but fits the current narratives pretty well. Should see more action🤞. CA: 0x2142d4816E259fd7C119f61c772e39AE0CdAAFde https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xc54abd6d98eac675b9715c740a50a1be6457297b #DYOR #RobinHoodChain
This one is also a good one for your Robin Hood token list; $HEY | Hey Research Lab. They are building a research & builder-Intelligence discovery layer for Robinhood Chain. Saw some good action earlier, hoping for more of that. CA: 0xb33eb16782776b4d738c0fd643577cb0284db610 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x1f0da4872bea85b2f95064d1c89671a5e578d114c375597d23962a0579771d16 #DYOR #RobinHoodChain
With the agentic narrative heating back up this looks like a good time to mention $MERRYMEN | Merrymen by Virtuals again. Chart is already looking like it crawling back up and their own perps just hit early access. A team that keeps building💪! CA: 0xa15cd06dd305269a0f48bebeb30aa3588fba7b32 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x27f8f8f1b080c7349c0f3bd66fe07732fbffd427 #DYOR #RobinHoodChain
Had my eye on $SPRING | Ticker Spring for a while now. Saw some intersting wallets scoop a bag and I can see why. Project is bringing yield to tokenized stocks so curious to see how this will do mid-longterm. CA: 0x440e339a46eaa3bE8d723c2cBED2A30af74536D5 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xfce28891d8e102df0f06e6ac72bd5ced5a40f5b792f848d63bea65eb7b33d2ca #DYOR #RobinHoodChain
Trading crypto? Kyroo Boost gives you extra cashback on trading fees on top of what your exchange already offers. 🔥 Exclusive for my community: The first 100 qualifying sign-ups through this link unlock a boosted cashback rate, locked in forever! Same trading. More back. 👇 https://kyroo.com/r/ALTCRYPTOGEMS?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=2026-10-promo-kol-altcryptogems&utm_content=altcryptogem…
❤1
Not giving up on this agentic narrative on RobinHood yet. Next to Merrymen I also see $KIVO | Kivo as a decent bet at these levels. Their agent seems to already be doing quite some volume. Could be one to keep tabs on🤖! CA: 0x4e74eaa2d6006d0d5195a870037d0fbf0e33b928 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x4521281640af145d72e3976dae321ee86dea7c29349a0d31e1fa461cf32b6531 #DYOR #RobinHoodChain
Been waiting to mention this one for a while; $REBATE | Rebate. Interesting concept and it seems to have caught the attention quite well. Hoping this goes for another run soonish. CA: 0xb7Ff57631B97000d950236ef63bD463da5bEBA7e https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xdfc96a1bc3455ffce6564e1833270c1b0664b761626db961012068007851d83c #DYOR #RobinHoodChain
Seeing $BLESS | Bless Token catching some big bids today. Something might be brewing over there so it might be worth taking note. Lets hope the bounce isnt done yet here🤞! CA: 0x7c8217517ed4711fe2deccdfeffe8d906b9ae11f https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0x49986efbeedea3ab962ca95caf86919860ecc9db #DYOR #BSC
🔥1
Been watching $ASSAY since launch and was waiting for it to cool off a bit. Its been holding very well these past 2 days and is now slowly crawling back up. Building a "trust layer for agents". CA: 0xa2b38467e9b60c016d94977ad37f825da4cd3462 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x617b079d8ba5c12a65f2ae9fffeba86d3912b6084212ab6080a390822af00949 #DYOR #RobinHoodChain
Hearing some good things about $OOLONG | Oolong here. Pretty interesting concept/flywheel, curious to see how this works out in the mid-longterm. Might add some on a dip. CA: 0x1bbe97fdb803ad21a7168dd549727881eac58347 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x9f0f6771fefd0837352055867691c7573a0daab753fe90c53b013ebace327171 #DYOR #RobinHoodChain
Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @Alt_Crypto_Gems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Alt_Crypto_Gems named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cryptoexpert · 103,056
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@NEXT100XGEMS · 38,749
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
@cryptogems555 · 23,535
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
@betspace_01 · 57,249
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 21 August 2026
@KucoinPumpChannel · 39,310
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🚀 Alt Crypto Gems 💎” (@Alt_Crypto_Gems), 10,297 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alt_Crypto_Gems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.