Channel
@AlphaHuntersHQ
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
142subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002583136185 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AlphaHuntersHQ |
| Description | Alpha Hunters 🧠🚀 Tracking the sharpest plays in Web3. Airdrops • Alpha • DeFi • Early Calls Only the bold survive. Dm @foxfunds0 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AlphaHuntersHQ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 142 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 142 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 3 | 50.0% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 17 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
JUST IN: Binance Founder CZ says countries need to tokenize stocks and issue their own crypto stablecoins to allow worldwide buyers. @WatcherGuru
Signed Abdoul | Studio Blockchain
JUST IN: 100,000 blocks remain until the next Bitcoin Halving. @WatcherGuru
Signed Abdoul | Studio Blockchain
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Senator Elizabeth Warren says the crypto Clarity Act will "blow up the economy." "It pushes more of the economy into crypto!" @WatcherGuru
JUST IN: Bitcoin reclaims $82,000 as Senate Banking Committee officially advances crypto Clarity Act. @WatcherGuru
For those asking me for a translation of what I said in the video in English, here are the key points in detail: I was talking about bundle buys and how they affect trading psychology right now. Sometimes, when you see a bundled supply in a SOL meme token, it can either be good or bad for the token, depending on the team behind it and the reason for the bundle. Some people buy a large bundled percentage of a token…
How to know if the team is dumping their bundle or if the first buy is suspicious: Using @DevsNightmareProbot can help you track whether the team is dumping supply from their bundle buy, which is a major red flag.
Another important thing is that most of the bundles you see on platforms like GMGN use Bubble Maps, which sometimes struggle to properly show exchange bundles. What is an exchange bundle? An exchange bundle is when exchange wallets are used to transfer SOL from different wallets to buy a percentage of a token’s supply in order to bypass normal Bubble Map detection. That’s why I provided https://deepnets.ai/ as a to…
🚀 Welcome to the Devs Nightmare Bot! 🚀 I'm your advanced Solana token analysis assistant. Here's what I can do for you: 1. 🔍 Token Analysis: - Scan any Solana token address for detailed information - View token metadata, creator details, and DEX presence 2. 👥 Team Tracking: - Analyze token team behavior and holdings - Track creator and team member wallet activities - Receive alerts on significant te…
Video, posted without a caption
Eid mubarak to all my muslim brothers/sisters❤️🫶🏻
Signed Abdoul | Studio Blockchain
Get job-ready and certified — your success story starts here 🎓 1- Google Cybersecurity Certificate programmingvalley.com/course/google-… 2- Google UX Design Certificate programmingvalley.com/course/google-… 3- Google Data Analytics Certificate programmingvalley.com/course/google-… 4- Google Digital Marketing programmingvalley.com/course/google-…
Signed Abdoul | Studio Blockchain
you're bullish enough.
🎉1
Signed 𝙉𝙖𝙯𝙞𝙛𝙞 𝙢𝙪𝙝ammad🔍
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AlphaHuntersHQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ALPHA HUNTER's” (@AlphaHuntersHQ), 142 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlphaHuntersHQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.