🐦 _Crypto 👽: tweet from _Crypto ⋅ 55s ago ❤️ 1 👀 5 ♻️ ℹ️ ✨

Channel
_Crypto's Alpha
@AlphaBy_Crypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
62subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002173325541 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AlphaBy_Crypto |
| Description | 👽 Mars or Bust 👽 x.com/_Crypto @UnderscoreCrypto |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AlphaBy_Crypto |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 62 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 62 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 16
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 35
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 18s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
25 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 12 | 48.0% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 24.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 12.0% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 4.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2025 to 3 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Tether becomes the largest independent holder of gold in the world, with only central banks owning more — link | AI comment
🐦 _Crypto 👽: tweet from _Crypto ⋅ 3m ago ❤️ 1 👀 35 ♻️ ℹ️ ✨
bro only got away with $65 in shitcoins after executing one of the largest supply chain hacks in history 😂 https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/bb347405-06a1-4268-a901-4b4e17d93bfa
🐦 _Crypto 👽: tweet from _Crypto ⋅ 46s ago 💬 1 ❤️ 1 👀 8 ♻️ ℹ️ ✨
🐦 _Crypto 👽: tweet from _Crypto ⋅ 1m ago ❤️ 1 👀 7 ♻️ ℹ️ ✨
We are up over 2X on our $CYOP bags and it’s still holding strong and building massive momentum Nobody is talking about this yet and it’s still ripping regardless, very soon we’ll start trading above $1m and then CT will catch on and from there it’ll be up only They hinted something cooking on their x few minutes ago, looks like they’ve got some big plans on the way Don’t sleep on these guys fam 🫡
❤1
Hard to beat a dedicated project that steadily grinds in this space. Doesn't hurt having over $90,000 in the DAO's combined war chest in only 2 months either. Probably nothing 🤷♂️ t.me/CyOpNewEra
❤🔥3🔥3💯1
FED LEAVES RATES UNCHANGED AT 4.25-4.5%
Also, late update but $CyOp hit a 2X+ over the weekends for those who got in with me. Utility coins are starting to grind up. And when $ETH breaks $4K, this wave gets explosive. Get ready for more wins if y’all got into our previous calls. 🤝
⚠️ SYSTEM INITIATED // AI BOOT SEQUENCE LIVE JOY detected a high-conviction BUY signal on $SUI. Manual override confirmed the signal—execution authorized. 🔻 TRADE DEPLOYED on Mainnet using $USUI — this marks the first ever live test of our Autonomous Intelligence. 🔗 TX: https://basescan.org/token/0xb0505e5a99abd03d94a1169e638b78edfed26ea4?a=0x2fca7e6305f57b63198eec06060a75d42d1f4b0f 💥 $17,800 from the fund allocat…
🐦 _Crypto 👽: tweet from _Crypto ⋅ 21m ago 💬 5 🔁 5 ❤️ 6 👀 175 ♻️ ℹ️ ✨ 0x2fca7e6305f57b63198eec06060a75d42d1f4b0f PHO⋅BAN⋅MAE⋅DEX⋅SPY⋅RICK
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AlphaBy_Crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“_Crypto's Alpha” (@AlphaBy_Crypto), 62 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlphaBy_Crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.