Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

هيئة المفضل بن عمر

@AlmufadalBnOmar

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,121subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001006760972
TypeChannel
Username@AlmufadalBnOmar
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AlmufadalBnOmar

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@AlmufadalBnOmar/47323 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 04:28 UTC@Al_burhan/775855 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC1.0017 hours
@AlmufadalBnOmar/47324 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 04:28 UTC@Al_burhan/775865 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC1.0017 hours
@AlmufadalBnOmar/47325 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 04:28 UTC@Al_burhan/775875 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC1.0017 hours
@AlmufadalBnOmar/47326 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 04:28 UTC@Al_burhan/775885 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC1.0017 hours
@AlmufadalBnOmar/47327 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 04:28 UTC@Al_burhan/775895 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC1.0017 hours
@AlmufadalBnOmar/47322 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 04:28 UTC@Al_burhan/775845 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC0.9917 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Al_burhan6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0017 hoursthis entry (60)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @AlmufadalBnOmar — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

3,1063,1213,113.56 August 2026 — 3,106 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,106 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,108 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,121 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,104–3,123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 20:093,121+13
7 Aug 2026, 10:473,108+2
6 Aug 2026, 11:013,106no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:573,106first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.14%
avg views ÷ 3,121 subscribers
Avg views / post
223
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held29 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total6,466
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
53m 22s
Average length
10m 40s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC135 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

الفيديو الذي حذفه اتباع السفياني دجال سجستان الذي سلط الوكلاء الفاسدين ونشرهم الذي دمر حديث العترة بتسليطه كتاب ابن الغضائري الذي أفتى بجواز التلقيح بنطفة اجنبي وبمجهول المالك والذي أفتى بطلان الصلاة عندما نذكر عليا بها ، فيبدو انه استعان بأبنائه الذين ولدوا بالتلقيح بنطفة اجنبي ليقدموا شكاوى على محتوى الفيديو وحذف بعد أقل من ساعتين من رفعه على قناتي على يوتيوب لذلك قمت برفعه لكم على تليجرام هيئة المفضل بن عمر والذي

7 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC168 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مع الأسف اتباع السيستاني استطاعوا حذفوا الفيديو من قناتي بسبب تبليغاتهم الكثيرة جدا

7 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC192 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

*منهج السفياني دجال سجستان منهج الكذب هو والمذهب الطوسي العباسي الذي يعتنقه / اما الدين الزهرائي دين القيمة هو دين الصدق ، فاختر لنفسك دينا ، تابع للاخر* https://youtu.be/GvHxYJK_kE0?si=_x2jC56z7XvlSiTn انشر ضروري للجميع

6 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC232 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

منهجية السيستاني : تضعيف روايات مقامات الأئمة عليهم السلام ومظلوميتهم وتفخيم نفسه وابنه المهيأ للمرجعية https://youtu.be/rTtoqUfq5_k?si=YHHr8ImngV3uuRXe

6 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTC238 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

منهجية السيستاني : تضعيف روايات مقامات الأئمة عليهم السلام ومظلوميتهم وتفخيم نفسه وابنه المهيأ للمرجعية

6 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC217 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/uE8kDjiRsfQ?si=5idbkXc6fyW-WXx6

6 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC278 viewsread 7 August 2026

لماذا خرج الإمام الحسين في يوم عرفة يوم الحج إلى كربلاء ؟ التبليغ في الأربعين أعظم بمليون مرة من التبليغ في الحج وأما الوجه المهدوي متن الحج وأصله فهو لقاء الإمام المعصوم وتجديد العهود معه الحج مساحة للتعارف بين الناس ولتبليغ دين العترة الطاهرة صلوات الله عليها وهذا هو السبب الرئيس الذي يجعل أصحاب الأئمة يتواجدون كل سنة في الحج وإذا أردنا أن نوجه أنظارنا إلى سيد الشهداء فإنه قام بدور التبليغ في الحج قبل أن يتحرك إلى

5 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC251 viewsread 7 August 2026

*ماذا قال إسحاق رابين لياسر عرفات عن الجيش العراقي ؟* https://youtu.be/1od5nk-QYkQ?si=FUbrkHU4kd8sAZUM

5 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC222 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

*ماذا قال إسحاق رابين لياسر عرفات عن الجيش العراقي ؟* https://youtu.be/1od5nk-QYkQ?si=FUbrkHU4kd8sAZUM

5 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC266 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/m0ceWTvltys?si=yjmGTXwRduoimjYI

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @AlmufadalBnOmar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 254,196 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“هيئة المفضل بن عمر” (@AlmufadalBnOmar), 3,121 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlmufadalBnOmar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.