Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AlimagomedovBJJ

Channel

AlimagomedovBJJ

@Alimagomedov187

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

777subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002146035275
TypeChannel
Username@Alimagomedov187
CreatedBetween 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Alimagomedov187

Growth

777780778.57 August 2026 — 780 subscribers8 August 2026 — 780 subscribers16 August 2026 — 777 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 777–780 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:46777-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:47780no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:40780first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.7%
avg views ÷ 777 subscribers
Avg views / post
394
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held10 (18 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,548
Reactions total146
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 25s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

158 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8553.8%
6239.2%
👍95.70%
👏21.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC167 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

One true dream was always to have big family with love and bliss ❤️

23

6 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC207 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Эта неделя очень насыщенная на события! В понедельник и в среду проводил тренировки в команде Abdullaev Team, где раскрывал азы и главные аспекты игры при проходах гарда! Было очень приятно поработать с такой профессиональной командой и познакомиться со всеми участниками лично. 🔥 Также удалось привезти своих учеников для обмена ценным опытом. 🔥🔥🔥 В двух словах - было круто! 🔥

🔥11

5 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC249 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ask and you shall receive! Всегда приятно работать с лучшими мастерами своего дела, будь то взаимодействия с лучшими спортсменами , предпринимателями или наставниками ! Не менее приятно работать с лучшим производителем кимоно в индустрии ! Сегодня мне досталась абсолютно новая с прилавок лимитированная коллекция Vital & RVCA 🔥🔥🔥 и это просто Бомба !!! Все думают, что я пишу лестные отзывы о фирме потому, что я их амб

👍6🔥51

3 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC268 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @abdullaev_teamPhoto

Сегодня была мощная тренировка в отличной компании🔥 Специальным гостем и тренером стал Али Магомедов🏆 Али поделился своим уникальным опытом и показал любимые техники: проходы Гарда через давление, работа по заданию и свободные схватки Было максимально интенсивно и отличный состав: 15 черных поясов, 1 пурпурный и 1 синий пояс🥋🤩 #AbdullaevTeam🇷🇺

🔥11👏21

3 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC317 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

У нас всегда была фраза: «С понедельника начну». В разных случаях она означала разное :)) Но чаще всего к понедельнику рождались лучшие оправдания и отмазки :) Мы в 187 прекрасно понимаем, что те, кто приходит впервые, переживают: будет сложно, непонятно, да и вообще, другие уже что-то знают и умеют. «БЖЖ с нуля» выстроен так, чтобы входить в тренировки было комфортно. А пробная тренировка позволяет убедиться в э

🔥21

30 Jul 2026, 18:43 UTC550 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Я уже писал, что у каждого есть своя стена. Та самая, до которой всё никак не доходят руки. Мы свою наконец снесли 💪 Теперь ваша очередь сделать шаг, который давно откладывали, тем более ❗️ С 1 августа у нас Обновленное расписание с новой группой Юниоры 13-17 Наш клубный аккаунт всё подскажет @club187admin #187BJJ

🔥123

26 Jul 2026, 10:03 UTC642 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В этом году нашему клубу исполнилось четыре года. Я уже рассказывал, с чего все начиналось и как постепенно рос 187. Мне всегда приятно смотреть на то, что все больше людей присоединяются к клубу, многие делают первые шаги в БЖЖ именно здесь. Люди знакомятся, находят друзей, становятся увереннее, поддерживают друг друга и просто приходят в место, где им хорошо. Давно думал о том, чтобы снести эту стену, но всему св

22🔥15

25 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC768 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Не особо хотел грузить вас информацией в субботу, но важное всё-таки: 1) Сносим стену и добавляем татами в 187. Места для тренировок станет больше. 2) Подростки теперь тренируются отдельно: каждый понедельник, среду и пятницу в 18:00 со мной. 3) 15 августа встречаемся на семинаре по сабмишенам из доминирующих позиций. Запись и все детали – у @club187admin ❤️

9🔥5👍3

18 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC539 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Завершили июльский семинар, встретимся 15 августа на этом же месте ❤️

🔥102

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Alimagomedov187. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 401,801 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AlimagomedovBJJ” (@Alimagomedov187), 777 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alimagomedov187.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.