آسیبهای تیپ شخصیتی درونگرا @Aliabdollahi_com
👍5❤1

Channel
@Aliabdollahi_com
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
420subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001758754206 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Aliabdollahi_com |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Aliabdollahi_com |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 420 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 423 | +14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 409 | +5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 404 | -7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 411 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 412 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 412 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 414 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
116 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 44.8% | |
| 👍 | 51 | 44.0% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 8.62% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.72% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.862% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2025 to 9 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
آسیبهای تیپ شخصیتی درونگرا @Aliabdollahi_com
👍5❤1
منافع تیپ شخصیتی درونگرا @Aliabdollahi_com
👍5❤3
هر آدمی برای خودش یک شابلون ذهنی داره. ینی وقتی با فردی یا فرد جدیدی روبرو میشه،شابلون ذهنیش رو میذاره رو اون آدم و اگر فرد مقابل با اون شابلون ذهنیش چفت شد،گاردش براش باز میشه و اگر نشد،گارد همچنان بستس براش تا شااااید بعد مدتی اتفاقی بیوفته که گاردش باز شه. همه ما اینطوری هستیم. و اینجاست که اهمیت علم رفتار شناسی و شخصیت شناسی نمایان میشه. @Aliabdollahi_com
❤4👍3
برای رسیدن به موفقیت،یه چیزی میگم بهش خوب فکر کنید: مشغول بودن کافی نیست،مورچهها هم مشغولاند.مسئله این است که به چه کاری مشغولیم. @Aliabdollahi_com
👍8❤1
جلسه مشاوره با مدیر ارشدی داشتم،عنوان کرد که تو خونه اونطور که باید رضایت کامل ندارم و حس میکنم یه چیزی کمه ولی نمیدونم اون چیه! بهش گفتم بخاطر اینه که شما ماهیت شغلت رو با زندگی شخصیت تفکیک نکردی. ینی همونطور که تو شغلت یک مدیر ارشد هستی و همه بهت احترام میذارن و تا کمر برات خم میشن و هرجا میری تکریمت میکنن،توقع داری در منزل هم به همون میزان احترام ببینی از همسر و فرزندانت و دقیقا همون کارایی رو انجام بدن برات که …
❤3👏3
1⃣همونطور که اکثریت به گزینه ۲ رای دادید،پاسخ درست "طرف مقابل" هست. -به لحاظ روانشناختی وقتی طرف مقابل قیمت را عنوان میکند،توپ در زمین او است و نوبت بازی ما با قیمت پیشنهادی. -همچنین وقتی شما قیمت را اول اعلام کنید،ممکن است قیمتی بالاتر از قیمت مد نظر او اعلام کنید و این باعث باخت شما میشود. اما🔻 2⃣استثنائاتی وجود دارد که در آن موارد، شما باید پیشنهاد اول را اعلام کنید.که من در اینجا فقط به یک مورد از آن اشاره م…
👍2👏2❤1
بنظر شما در مذاکره،پیشنهاد اول را برای قیمت چه کسی باید بده؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
🔶چگونه در محیط کار پاداش بدهیم؟ 🔸بی شک همه میدانیم که ارائه پاداش چقدر در بالا بردن راندمان در محیط های کاری موثر است؛ و در جایگاه های مختلف آن را تجریه کرده ایم. 🔸مایکل لوبوف در کتاب «بزرگترین اصل مدیریت در دنیا» مینویسد: یکی از اشتباهات اکثر شرکتها این است که وقتی میخواهند به کارمندان پاداش بدهند، عمدتا روی پاداش نقدی تمرکز میکنند و از بقیه انواع پاداشها غافل میشوند 🔺این در حالی است که شرکتهای حرفهای به…
👍4❤1
🟠هنگام بروز چالش،مشکل یا یک مسئله چگونه میتوان به سرعت راه حل برایش یافت؟ 🔴اگر این سوال،سوال شماست این آموزش رو از دست ندید. در این آموزش به شما یاد میدم که چگونه راه حل یک چالش و مشکل رو پیدا کنید. @Aliabdollahi_com
👍2👏2❤1
🔸 ده جمله ای که در محل کار نباید استفاده کرد: براساس تحقیقی که به تازگی انجام شده و طبق توصیه کارشناسان، ۱۰ جمله زیر را فیگارو به عنوان بدترین چیزهایی انتخاب کرده که میتوان در محیط کار به زبان آورد. 1⃣ این کار من نیست همین جمله ساده و پرکاربرد باعث میشود شما خودتان را از جمع اعضای تیم کاریتان جدا کنید. این جمله دقیقا متضاد حس انعطاف پذیری و میل به یاد گرفتن چیزهای جدیدی است که برای برعهده گرفتن پستهای حساس و …
👍6❤1
🟠اگر آدم خجالتیای هستید و اگر نمیتونید حرفتون رو در موقع خودش بزنید،این آموزش رو به هیچ وجه از دست ندید. 🔴در این آموزش با توضیحات و راهکارهای علمی و عملی به شما یاد میدم که چگونه خجالتی بودن خودتون رو درمان کنید. @Aliabdollahi_com
👍3❤2
#پادکست آموزشی 🔸در این آموزش به درس مهم #تصمیم_گیری پرداختم که جز دروس تدریس شدهی مهم در دانشگاههای مطرح دنیا هست. در این آموزش یکی از تکنیکها و روشهای تصمیم گیری سریع،دقیق و درست را خدمتتون آموزش دادم که بتوانید زمان انتخاب و تصمیم گرفتن دچار سردرگمی،تشویش و استیصال نشوید. 📌در صورت امکان با هندزفری گوش کنید که تجربه بهتری از آموزش داشته باشید. @Aliabdollahi_com
❤3👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Aliabdollahi_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بنظر شما در مذاکره،پیشنهاد اول را برای قیمت چه کسی باید بده؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
در جلسات و نشستهای کاری اگر میزبان به ما گفت روی فلان صندلی بنشیند یا صندلیای را به ما نشان داد و گفت بفرمائید، آیا باید روی همان صندلی نشست یا خیر؟
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2025 to 9 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شخصیتشناسی/مذاکره” (@Aliabdollahi_com), 420 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aliabdollahi_com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.