Channel
@AletheiaVeritas2021
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
160subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001591522673 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AletheiaVeritas2021 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AletheiaVeritas2021 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 160 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 161 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 160 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 160 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 69.2% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 15.4% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Die Antwort wirkt sachlich, enthält keine einzige Lüge – sie lässt nur die Gegenargumente weg. Das ist die eleganteste Beeinflussung, die je erfunden wurde. Gegen eine Lüge können Sie sich wehren. Gegen eine Auslassung nicht, denn Sie müssten wissen, was fehlt. Im Alltag erleben Sie das bei jedem aufgeladenen Thema. Die großen Systeme folgen dort fast ausschließlich den etablierten Institutionen, und ausgeblendet we…
Guten Tag, liebe Leserin. Guten Tag, lieber Leser. Machen Sie ein Experiment. Es kostet nur zehn Minuten Ihrer Lebenszeit. Ein Leser im sonnigen Spanien hat mich darauf aufmerksam gemacht und mir seine Gespräche mit seinen KI-Kumpels gesendet. Es wird Zeit, dass ich darüber schreibe. Stellen Sie drei verschiedenen KI-Systemen dieselbe Frage, wortgleich. Sie werden drei verschiedene Antworten erhalten. Nicht drei Va…
Interessante Analyse, wie man Freund und Feind identifizieren kann - Integrität, Abhängigkeiten, Limited Hangouts... Interessanterweise verortet sie Tucker Carlson im DU - für sie ist er ein Überläufer aus dem CU. Für mich ist er immer noch dort, aber das kann auch einfach unter die Rubrik: "ein einmal gefälltes Urteil bleibt, ohne Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens durch mich" fallen - ich höre dem Mann schlichtweg nich…
https://solarireport.substack.com/p/how-to-identify-the-independent-pro
https://t.me/WhieBoySummer
👍1
Mit der Hand schreiben
Cursive is making a comeback.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd4shRpMN50
Man wird sehen, wie viel Erfolg oder Mißerfolg diese Bemühungen haben werden. Das globale Netzwerk, welches die genannte Akte von Terrorismus, Morde und andere Verbrechen gegen die Menschheit begehen, hat auch die Aufklärung der Sprengungenvon 9/11 und andere enttarnte Verbrechen bisher immer erfolgreich überstanden. Einige Bauernopfer (ob real oder nur vorgetäuscht >> Hitler, Epstein) erfolgen, und es wird munter …
The Vires Law Group (VLG) of West Palm Beach, Florida, together with the Rachel Rodriguez for Governor campaign, announces that letters have been sent to the Attorneys General and Governors of all 50 states, thanking officials of Alabama and Louisiana and requesting that the other states also follow Florida's lead in investigating and, where warranted, prosecuting participants of the Covid Criminal Enterprise under V…
Mindcontrol durch Ebooks „Ebook-Leser, insbesondere von Amazon-Kindle-Geräten, werden leider bei fast allem überwacht: wo ihre Augen verweilen, wo sie stehen bleiben, was sie überblättern, welche Vorlieben sie haben, was ihnen sonst noch gefällt, wann sie lesen, wie lange sie bei der Lektüre bleiben, was ihnen auffällt, was ihnen gefällt und was nicht. Seit einigen Jahren durchlaufen zudem die Buchinhalte selbst eine…
💯1
https://norberthaering.de/propaganda-zensur/kivi-auskunft/
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AletheiaVeritas2021. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aletheia Veritas 2021” (@AletheiaVeritas2021), 160 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AletheiaVeritas2021.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.