Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Alek_XIV

@Alek_XIV

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

45subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002407090988
TypeChannel
Username@Alek_XIV
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Alek_XIV

Growth

4510 Aug 2026, 10:46 — 45 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 15:31 — 45 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 10:4610 Aug 2026, 15:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44–46 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:3145no change
10 Aug 2026, 10:4645first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
40
Videos
1
Links
12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

226 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15367.7%
🔥3515.5%
❤‍🔥2410.6%
🌭31.33%
👍31.33%
🎄20.885%
💯20.885%
🤯20.885%
💘10.442%
😎10.442%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 226reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2025 to 6 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Mar 2026, 04:03 UTC64 views28 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ну, вроде, всё :) Масштабная работа под кодовым именем "Роковая Красотка" успешно завершена. Времени на проработку ушло неприлично много, но я тут с ним и не считался. Просто хотел выдать некий "максимум", на который способен на данный момент, с возможностью "семь раз отмерить" каждый шаг. Ускоряться будем потом. Хочу выразить большое человеческое "ку" Миррре (за то, что запустил весь этот процесс), Физз (за очень

❤‍🔥1310🔥5

24 Feb 2026, 14:15 UTC80 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#практика длиной в 30 минут, но уже в Крите. Начинает нравиться такой формат :)

8❤‍🔥3

23 Feb 2026, 15:09 UTC77 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Нарисовал пиксельную девушку-бабочку для вот этого мероприятия. Скоро, надеюсь, будет готова ещё одна "масштабная" работа, но в целом сейчас больше грызу гранит рисовательной науки (ибо чувствую, что надо), а поэтому и появляюсь реже, чем мог бы :)

8🔥5

28 Jan 2026, 11:46 UTC104 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @shizaraskumarPhoto

Сегодня хочу поздравить с днём рождения ещё одного представителя прекрасного сословия, начинающегося с большой буквы "Х" и нет, это не то ругательство, о котором вы подумали. Алек, поздравляю с твоим днём, дарю этот пёстрый коллажик и пожелания. А что именно? Удачи в развитии твоих навыков и умений, пусть усердная работа будет вознаграждена невероятным успехом!🧊 В общем, Алек тот самый человек - работа, находясь в ег

10

25 Jan 2026, 17:14 UTC93 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Заметил, что в последнее время начатого стало просто неприлично больше, чем законченного (или, по крайней мере, доведённого до ума). Поэтому в ближайшем будущем планирую (во всяком случае, надеюсь) окучить несколько отложенных в долгий ящик работ. Первой на очереди оказалась гипсовая голова Цезаря. Поставил себе дедлайном "пока не задолбаюсь в воскресенье", и вот что в итоге получилось.

16

8 Jan 2026, 15:55 UTC101 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @MarvinWriterPhoto

Ещё одна ахриненая коллаба!!!! Спасибо Алеку и Физле за неё!!!

7

8 Jan 2026, 15:52 UTC120 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

И ещё одна коллаба. Художники — те же, плюс я. Четверг удался ^___^ Лютейшее спасибо Fizz и Марвину за то, что задали сегодня жару!

7

8 Jan 2026, 14:26 UTC99 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @shizaraskumarPhoto

ЛЮТЕЙШАЯ ВНЕЗАПНАЯ КОЛЛАБА С МАРВИНОМ!!!! Смотреть осторожно, крутость этой картинки зашкаливает так сильно, что выплывают глаза, смотреть только в музыкальном сопровождении трека "MOONLGHT - Free Bird"!!1!!1🕺🔈🕺

3💘1

31 Dec 2025, 14:04 UTC117 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🎄Ну а теперь — всех с наступающим Новым Годом! 🎉 Или с наступившим, если вы читаете это уже из 2026-го 😊

11🔥3🎄2

30 Dec 2025, 11:46 UTC162 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🎅Спешу залететь в последний вагон новогоднего коллаба Пиксельной Папки! Там скоро будет праздничная ёлка, и ей нужны игрушки🎄 Формат моей - 64x64 пикселя, оригинал в комментариях. [впредь надо будет чаще делать что-то малопиксельное, с непривычки сложно]

8🔥5

30 Dec 2025, 04:46 UTC95 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

✍️ Где-то когда-то слышал, что для понимания распределения света по воображаемому объекту сто́ит покрыть его полигональной сеткой, после чего всё станет сильно проще и понятнее. Попробовал, вроде бы работает 🤔 #WIP

11💯2🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Alek_XIV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,245,387 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alek_XIV” (@Alek_XIV), 45 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alek_XIV.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.