Channel
@AirdropNews
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,075subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001272385884 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AirdropNews |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AirdropNews |
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Airdropdatabase/51887 Apr 2023, 15:14 UTC | @AirdropNews/9089 · this entry7 Apr 2023, 15:22 UTC | 1.00 | 9 minutes |
| @Airdropdatabase/51909 Apr 2023, 01:48 UTC | @AirdropNews/9091 · this entry9 Apr 2023, 01:48 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Airdropdatabase/51919 Apr 2023, 19:54 UTC | @AirdropNews/9092 · this entry9 Apr 2023, 19:54 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Airdropdatabase/519410 Apr 2023, 19:47 UTC | @AirdropNews/9095 · this entry10 Apr 2023, 19:47 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @AirdropNews/9099 · this entry11 Apr 2023, 19:10 UTC | @Airdropdatabase/519811 Apr 2023, 19:10 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @AirdropNews/9101 · this entry12 Apr 2023, 11:45 UTC | @Airdropdatabase/520012 Apr 2023, 11:45 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Airdropdatabase | 20 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (14–6) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 April 2023 to 15 April 2023. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @AirdropNews — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 3,075 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:00 | 3,082 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:51 | 3,082 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
💧 Cyber Girls @Airdrop 💧 ✔️ Audit: FreshCoins 🏆 Task: ➕ 300 CBC for 3000 random participants each. 👨👩👧 Referral: ➕ 100,000 CBC for top 50 referrers. ➡️ Airdrop bot for Cyber Girls ↪️ Join Cyber Girls Telegram group. (Required » 70 CBC) ↪️ Follow Cyber Girls on Twitter and retweet the pinned post by tagging 3 of your friends. (Required » 70 CBC) ↪️ Follow Cyber Girls on Instagram. (Required » 70 CB…
💧 Baby Aptos @Airdrop 💧 🏆 Task: ➕ $10 worth of bAptos for 2000 random participants each. 👨👩👧 Referral: ➕ $5000 worth of bAptos for top 50 referrers. ➡️ Airdrop bot for Baby Aptos ↪️ Join Baby Aptos Telegram group. (Required » 40 Points) ↪️ Follow Baby Aptos on Twitter and retweet the pinned post by tagging 3 of your friends. (Required » 40 Points) ↪️ You can perform other tasks on the bot. (Optiona…
💧 SpookyHalloweenCEO @Airdrop 💧 🏆 Task: ➕ $9 worth of SpookyCEO for 1000 random participants each. 👨👩👧 Referral: ➕ $1000 worth of SpookyCEO for top 30 referrers. ➡️ Airdrop bot for SpookyHalloweenCEO ↪️ Join SpookyHalloweenCEO Telegram group & Telegram channel. (Required » 40 Points) ↪️ Follow SpookyHalloweenCEO on Twitter and retweet the pinned post by tagging 3 of your friends. (Required » 40 Poi…
💧 XcelPad @Airdrop 💧 🏆 Task: ➕ $9 worth of XL for 900 random participants each. 👨👩👧 Referral: ➕ $1000 worth of XL for top 30 referrers. ➡️ Airdrop bot for XcelPad ↪️ Join XcelPad Telegram group. (Required » 35 Points) ↪️ Follow XcelPad on Twitter and retweet the pinned post by tagging 3 of your friends. (Required » 35 Points) ↪️ Subscribe to XcelPad Discord channel. (Optional » 20 Points) ↪️ You ca…
💧 zkSVM @Airdrop 💧 ✔️ Audit: CFGNINJA KYC: PinkSale 🏆 Task: ➕ 2 Million zkSVM for all eligible participants. 👨👩👧 Referral: ➕ 1000 BUSD for top 10 referrers. ➡️ Airdrop bot for zkSVM ↪️ Join zkSVM Telegram group & Telegram channel. (Required » 30 Points) ↪️ Follow zkSVM on Twitter and retweet the pinned post by tagging 3 of your friends. (Required » 30 Points) ↪️ Subscribe to zkSVM Discord channel.…
💧 Doge Twitter @Airdrop 💧 ✔️ Audit: BlockSAFU 🏆 Task: ➕ 1600 DOGETWT for 1000 random participants each. 👨👩👧 Referral: ➕ 500,000 DOGETWT for top 50 referrers. ➡️ Airdrop bot for Doge Twitter ↪️ Join Doge Twitter Telegram group & Telegram channel. (Required » 20 Points) ↪️ Follow Doge Twitter on Twitter and retweet the pinned post by tagging 3 of your friends. (Required » 20 Points) ↪️ Subscribe to …
💧 DevOps @Airdrop 💧 🏆 Task: ➕ $10 worth of Devs for 1800 random participants each. 👨👩👧 Referral: ➕ $2000 worth of Devs for top 50 referrers. ➡️ Airdrop bot for DevOps ↪️ Join DevOps Telegram group. (Required » 45 Points) ↪️ Follow DevOps on Twitter and retweet the pinned post by tagging 3 of your friends. (Required » 45 Points) ↪️ You can perform other tasks on the bot. (Optional » 10 Points) ↪️ En…
💧 Bitcoin Classic @Airdrop 💧 🏆 Task: ➕ Up to 100 BTCC 👨👩👧 Referral: ➕ 10 BTCC ➕ 20 USDT for top 10 referrers each. ➡️ Airdrop bot for Bitcoin Classic ↪️ Join Bitcoin Classic Telegram group & Telegram channel. (Required » 35 BTCC) ↪️ Follow Bitcoin Classic on Twitter and retweet the pinned post by tagging 1 of your friends. (Required » 35 BTCC) ↪️ You can perform other ta…
💧 Twelve Zodiac @Airdrop 💧 🏆 Task: ➕ 5 TWELVE (~$5) for 1800 random participants each. 👨👩👧 Referral: ➕ 1000 TWELVE (~$1000) for top 30 referrers. ➡️ Airdrop bot for Twelve Zodiac ↪️ Join Twelve Zodiac Telegram group & Telegram channel. (Required » 30 Points) ↪️ Follow Twelve Zodiac on Twitter and retweet the pinned post by tagging 3 of your friends. (Required » 25 Points) ↪️ Subscribe to Twelve Zod…
💧 SummitPad @Airdrop 💧 🏆 Task: ➕ 500 SUM 👨👩👧 Referral: ➕ 100 SUM ➡️ Airdrop bot for SummitPad ↪️ Join SummitPad Telegram group & Telegram channel. ↪️ Follow SummitPad on Twitter and retweet this post by tagging 3 of your friends. ↪️ Enter your information to the airdrop bot. 🔐 All airdrop steps should be completed. ✏️ Notes: Total airdrop pool is 50,000 SUM. 100 participants will be selected ra…
💧 AI Meta Club @Airdrop 💧 🏆 Task: ➕ 30,000 AMC for 1700 participants. ➡️ Airdrop form for AI Meta Club ↪️ Join AI Meta Club Telegram group & Telegram channel. ↪️ Follow AI Meta Club on Twitter. ↪️ Subscribe to AI Meta Club Discord channel. ↪️ Enter your information to the airdrop form. 🔐 All airdrop steps should be completed. ✏️ Notes: Airdrop will end on April 17, 2023. Total airdrop pool is 30,000 A…
💧 EtherialVerse @Airdrop 💧 🏆 Task: ➕ $10 worth of ETV for 2000 random participants each. 👨👩👧 Referral: ➕ $2000 worth of ETV for top 50 referrers. ➡️ Airdrop bot for EtherialVerse ↪️ Join EtherialVerse Telegram group. (Required » $4 worth of ETV) ↪️ Follow EtherialVerse on Twitter and retweet the pinned post by tagging 3 of your friends. (Required » $4 worth of ETV) ↪️ You can perform other tasks on…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AirdropNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,022,256 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@AirdropNews named 14 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Airdrop News” (@AirdropNews), 3,075 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AirdropNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.