Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Андервольт PG-21

@AhyetWer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,029subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002272156961
TypeChannel
Username@AhyetWer
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AhyetWer

Growth

1,0131,0291,0216 August 2026 — 1,013 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,013 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,015 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,028 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,029 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 8 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,011–1,031 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:281,029+1
10 Aug 2026, 22:511,028+13
7 Aug 2026, 15:351,015+2
6 Aug 2026, 18:011,013no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:491,013first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.1%
avg views ÷ 1,029 subscribers
Avg views / post
259
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
23.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held13 (4 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,364
Reactions total794
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

794 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 544754104139987905536546.0%
custom 540465191459383672123529.6%
custom 5283088294119227525637.93%
custom 5282763422792956377597.43%
custom 5267014997489239302465.79%
custom 5370676872151572021263.27%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 794reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 13 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
30
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AhyetWer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC80 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ㅤ 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 ☺️уя Накахара никак не ожидал, что в свои восемнадцать лет он встретит... полную копию самого себя. 🌟🌟: ☺️лушай, лучше спросить что-то у опытного старшего, чем гуглить всякую пошлятину, о которой ты думаешь, судя по взгляду. ㅤ 🌟🌟: ☺️не Дазай рассказывал, что парни... ну... сквиртом кончать умеют. 🚸💦 ㅤ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ㅤ

custom 54475410413998790556

Signed ᴏᴩiuʍ

6 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC179 views43 reactionsread 6 August 2026

чтож,это пиздец,при учете того,что 9 меня не будет в городе,а как успеть,хуй знает

custom 528308829411922752525custom 528276342279295637712custom 53706768721515720216

Signed ᴏᴩiuʍ

6 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC176 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

что ж ,это пиздец. Особенно учитывая тот факт, что 9 меня не должно быть в городе

custom 540465191459383672123custom 528276342279295637712custom 53706768721515720215

Signed ᴏᴩiuʍ

6 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC224 views67 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Небольшой Хэд на то,что Осаму режет себя в присутствии других — Не чтобы обратить внимание, а чтобы посмотреть, как они реагируют. Если никто не смотрит — он перестаёт, потому что теряет смысл.

custom 544754104139987905540custom 528276342279295637713custom 54046519145938367219custom 52830882941192275255

Signed ᴏᴩiuʍ

6 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC233 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

— осталось 31

custom 544754104139987905524

Signed ᴏᴩiuʍ

6 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC252 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ㅤ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🌟🌟: И какого хуя тебе здесь нужно, омежка? 🌟🌟: Не шуми, альфа, — хрипло усмехнулся шатен бархатным тихим голосом. — Я всего-навсего пришёл поздравить тебя с днём рождения. 🎁🤩 ㅤ 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 ㅤ

custom 544754104139987905521

Signed ᴏᴩiuʍ

6 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC266 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

ㅤ 🤩✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨🥰✨🤩 Зарисовка по вашим любимым пейрингам уже ждут на канале - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🤩🤩✨✨: ✋ ☺️ саму изо всех сил пытается не кончить, пока его седлает разгорячённый партнёр 🤩 ☺️то будет, если сыграть в «Семь минут в раю» с тем, с кем привык играть в дружбу? 🫀 ☺️ оздравление любимой девушки заканчивается самыми интимными поцелуями (фем) - - - - - - - - - - - -

custom 544754104139987905511custom 52827634227929563773custom 54046519145938367213

Signed ᴏᴩiuʍ

5 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC292 views54 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🕊🕊

custom 544754104139987905537custom 528276342279295637710custom 52670149974892393025custom 54046519145938367212

Signed ᴏᴩiuʍ

5 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC300 views71 reactionsread 6 August 2026

А вы знали,что я иной раз специально томлю с постами, пока на предыдущим появится больше реакций?🫢🫢 ну я так,по секрет🤫🤫

custom 544754104139987905539custom 540465191459383672117custom 52827634227929563778custom 52830882941192275256custom 52670149974892393021

Signed ᴏᴩiuʍ

5 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC308 views97 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Кстати,пару комишек ,которын я не выкладывал, но считаю, стоит исправляться🥺

custom 544754104139987905551custom 540465191459383672127custom 526701499748923930217custom 52830882941192275252

Signed ᴏᴩiuʍ

4 Aug 2026, 23:59 UTC343 views165 reactions30 Starsread 6 August 2026

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 AU!SOUKOKU16 #ОмегаверсAU Осаму — Омежка Чуя — Альфа 💕Часть 8💕 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Чуя вышел за дверь,немного отойдя,прежде чем остановиться. Вдохнул и чуть не согнуло снова. Воздух снаружи был таким же мутным, с примесью гнили и пыли, но даже он казался чище, чем то, что осталось внутри той комнаты. Голова гудела. Мысли не складывались в прямую линию,а рвались, как старая ткань. Он зажмурился и

custom 5447541041399879055123custom 540465191459383672125custom 528308829411922752516custom 52827634227929563771

Signed ᴏᴩiuʍ

4 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC360 views110 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я НЕ СМОГ СДЕРЖАТЬСЯ..

custom 540465191459383672179custom 526701499748923930218custom 544754104139987905513

Signed ᴏᴩiuʍ

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @AhyetWer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 100,854 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Андервольт PG-21” (@AhyetWer), 1,029 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AhyetWer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.