عاجل | إعلام العدو: أولى تبعات الهزيمة الانتخابية، مغادرة رئيسة طاقم البيت الأبيض سوزي وايلز لمنصبها، وتعيين نائبها المتشدد ستيفن ميلر خلفاً لها. #أحرار_الفارعة 💚🔥 t.me/Ahrar_alfaraa

Channel
أحرار الفارعة 💚🔥
@Ahrar_alfaraa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,319subscribers
-1,689 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001589799396 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ahrar_alfaraa |
| Description | "أحرار الفارعة" قناة إخبارية إعلامية مستقلة مختصة بتغطية أخبار وأحداث مخيم الفارعة ومحافظة طوباس خاصة وأخبار فلسطين عامة. مهمتنا السرعة والمصداقية في نقل الحقيقة الدقيقة بوت القناة : @ahraralfaraa_bot القناة الإحتياطية : https://t.me/Ahrar_alfaraa2 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ahrar_alfaraa |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:56 | 20,319 | -23 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:59 | 20,342 | -17 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:46 | 20,359 | -7 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:26 | 20,366 | -18 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:39 | 20,384 | -23 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:31 | 20,407 | -10 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 20,417 | -29 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:58 | 20,446 | -26 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:30 | 20,472 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:37 | 20,481 | -14 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:10 | 20,495 | -17 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 20,512 | -2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:58 | 20,514 | -19 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:48 | 20,533 | -20 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:31 | 20,553 | -20 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:26 | 20,573 | -18 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:50 | 20,591 | -17 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:57 | 20,608 | -13 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 20,621 | -20 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:48 | 20,641 | first reading |
Engagement
641 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.96%
- avg views ÷ 20,319 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 805
- 110 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.217%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 110
- of 641 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 104 of 110 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 641 (6 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 88,599 |
| Reactions total | 183 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 03:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈26,800
- Videos
- ≈19,200
- Links
- ≈39,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 17m
- Average length
- 1m 00s
Measured directly from 78 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,577 reactions across 615 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,365 | 86.6% | |
| 💔 | 116 | 7.36% | |
| 😢 | 21 | 1.33% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 1.08% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 0.698% | |
| 👀 | 10 | 0.634% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 0.571% | |
| 🫡 | 9 | 0.571% | |
| 😭 | 8 | 0.507% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.19% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.19% | |
| 😡 | 3 | 0.19% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.127% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 620 of the 641 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,577 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 641 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 110 posts held from the last 30 days (11.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
المنظمة البحرية الدولية: مقتل 25 بحاراً في مضيق هرمز منذ اندلاع الحرب على إيران.. #أحرار_الفارعة 💚🔥 t.me/Ahrar_alfaraa
❤1
الكاذب ترامب عن إيران: مضيق هرمز مفتوح ولم نفقد أي جندي خلال الأشهر السبعة الماضية #أحرار_الفارعة 💚🔥 t.me/Ahrar_alfaraa
❤2👀1
الراصد الجوي،. ليث العلامي: - التوقعات تشير إلى اقتراب ذروة تأثير المنخفض الجوي في وقت متأخر من هذه الليلة وخلال يوم غد السبت، بعد هطول أمطار متفرقة ذات طابع محلي فوق عدة مناطق من البلاد خلال الساعات الماضية، رغم أنها كانت أقل من المتوقع في بعض المناطق. - من المتوقع أن يبدأ الجزء الأكثر فعالية من المنخفض بالتأثير بوضوح خلال الساعات المقبلة، وتحديدًا يوم السبت، حيث تهطل الأمطار على نطاق واسع من البلاد، بما فيها مختل…
❤2
دقائق فقط من هطول الأمطار كانت كفيلة بإغراق عدد من خيام النازحين في قطاع غزة، لتتفاقم معاناة العائلات التي تواجه الشتاء بلا مأوى آمن #أحرار_الفارعة 💚🔥 t.me/Ahrar_alfaraa
❤2
قطاع غزة الآن.💔 #أحرار_الفارعة 💚🔥 t.me/Ahrar_alfaraa
❤3😢1
مصادر محلية: غرق مخيم الفردوس في منطقة السلاطين شمال غربي بيت لاهيا شمالي قطاع غزة. #أحرار_الفارعة 💚🔥 t.me/Ahrar_alfaraa
❤1
قوات الاحتلال تقتحم مدينة اريحا .. #أحرار_الفارعة 💚🔥 t.me/Ahrar_alfaraa
❤1
🔴 واشنطن تفرض عقوبات على 8 شركات كندية ومحافظ رقمية للاشتباه بارتباطها بشبكات مالية إيرانية فرضت وزارة الخزانة الأمريكية عقوبات على ثماني شركات كندية متخصصة في الخدمات المالية وتحويل الأموال، إضافة إلى محافظ عملات رقمية مرتبطة بها، وذلك بموجب الأمر التنفيذي رقم (13902). وتشمل العقوبات كيانات تنشط في مدن تورونتو وفانكوفر ومونتريال، وتشتبه واشنطن بارتباطها بشبكات مالية إيرانية. #أحرار_الفارعة 💚🔥 t.me/Ahrar_alfaraa
❤1
مصدر عسكري إسرائيلي: الجيش الإسرائيلي مستعد لعملية عسكرية محتملة في إيران وينتظر قرار واشنطن #أحرار_الفارعة 💚🔥 t.me/Ahrar_alfaraa
❤4
هيئة الأسرى: المحكمة العليا الإسرائيلية تقرر استرجاع جثمان الشهيد الأسير وليد خالد أحمد، بعد جهود قانونية مكثفة شملت تقديم العديد من الالتماسات والطلبات من قبل الوحدة القانونية في الهيئة، عبر محاميتها نادية دقة يذكر أن الشهيد وليد أحمد (17 عاما) من بلدة سلواد شرق رام الله والبيرة، اعتقل بتاريخ 30 أيلول/سبتمبر 2024، واستشهد في سجن مجدو بتاريخ 24 آذار/مارس 2025، بينما كان لا يزال موقوفا #أحرار_الفارعة 💚🔥 t.me/Ahrar…
❤3
صدقة عن روح شهيدنا احمد النبريصي : - سُبحان الله - الحمدلله - لا إله إلا الله - اللهُ أكبر - سُبحان الله و بحمده - سُبحان الله العظيم - استغفر الله و أتوبُ إليه - لا حول و لا قوة إلا بالله - اللهم صلِِّ وسلم على نبينا محمد - لا إله إلا الله محمد رسول الله #أحرار_الفارعة 💚🔥 t.me/Ahrar_alfaraa
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 641 posts we hold for @Ahrar_alfaraa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Faracamp · 43,711#1
@Tamoon_NabD1 · 20,126#2
@napedtubas · 9,115#3
@Balata12 · 138,659#4
@mnart_hdaya · 160,341#5
@TamoonAlMajd · 8,689#6
@TubasAlkdraa · 37,511#7
@Nablusgheer · 378,229#8
@nabedtubas · 3,312#9
@jeniincamp · 181,372#10
@Tubas_Blac · 3,473#11
@tubas70 · 169#12
@balata_alhadat · 45,900#13
@jenencamb · 196,457#14
@wasm_ala7rar4 · 1,951#15
@samsalmohaiam · 65,274#16
@rasdnourshams · 9,965#17
@tubasGate · 11,168#18
@AhrarNoorShams · 36,949#19
@ahmad_daraghmeh1 · 2,412#20
@ahrar_qalqilia · 3#21
@fajeralhoria · 2,201#22
@Jeninal3mliaat · 54,170#23
@Almustashaar · 828,730#24
@Tamoun_baldtna · 9,853#25
@meshheek · 375,816#26
@jenenthorah · 14,426 (as read 25 September 2026)#27
@TubasTimes · 17,196#28
@tullkarm_green · 4,331#29
@adraghma · 726#30
@jeninnews1 · 223,701#31
@tammon_tamm · 23,101#32
@aqappaA7rar · 20,448#33
@SarayaaTubas · 1,902#34
@mukhayam_alfariea · 6,131#35
@Qabatyia · 57,299#36
@balataalbld · 8,241#37
@tubas77 · 1,595#38
@nouron_nour · 8,471#39
@nabuls_news · 181,128#40
@Tubas5555 · 439 (as read 25 September 2026)#41
@tobas2 · 2,273#42
@noursams · 27,070#43
@jeninnalmajd · 30,035#44
@qudsn · 604,482#45
@rueib_alkian · 114,894#46
@azzamaddas · 253,314#47
@tubas101 · 7,280#48
@tadwena123 · 71,701#49
@ant_watny · 7,346#50
@tulkrmeoon · 61,935#51
@tulkarembaladna10 · 55,891#52
@shababalfar3a · 944#53
@Aqaba_press · 5,868#54
@kayann_10 · 249 (as read 25 September 2026)#55
@yazanamkhateeb · 323#56
@rabeea09 · 316#57
@qmarjenen48 · 4,757#58
@ahmad_alsamur · 274#59
@cwvcc · 3,192#60
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Tamoon_NabD1 · 20,126
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 24 September 2026
@aqappaA7rar · 20,448
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 September 2026
@Faracamp · 43,711
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
@TubasAlkdraa · 37,511
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 1 September 2026
@tammon_tamm · 23,101
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 September 2026
@Qabatyia · 57,299
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
@Palestine0377 · 32,174
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 September 2026
@jeninnalmajd · 30,035
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 5 September 2026
@ahrar_qalqilia · 3
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 26 August 2026
@balata_alhadat · 45,900
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 26 August 2026
@AhrarNoorShams · 36,949
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
@Balata12 · 138,659
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 August 2026
@ra_50_mm · 45,529
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
@nabulsi98 · 34,256
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 14 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أحرار الفارعة 💚🔥” (@Ahrar_alfaraa), 20,319 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ahrar_alfaraa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.