Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

(архив) Σε αγαπώ !! 🪉

@Agapi_HappyNation

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003901671638
TypeChannel
Username@Agapi_HappyNation
Descriptionlove us, together
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 30 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Agapi_HappyNation

Growth

1412 Aug 2026, 02:49 — 14 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 03:01 — 14 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 02:4912 Aug 2026, 03:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13–15 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:0114no change
12 Aug 2026, 02:4914first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 30 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
76.2%
avg views ÷ 14 subscribers
Avg views / post
10.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held18 (30 May 202628 July 2026)
Views total32
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
16
Videos
2
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
23s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

66 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52267948363754010772030.3%
custom 52175628428273577811116.7%
custom 5326029634842687131710.6%
custom 5442957538200940495710.6%
69.09%
custom 628498554157426795657.58%
custom 490464039904319980746.06%
custom 532604138157824207846.06%
custom 528318345341464616111.52%
🕊11.52%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC11 viewsread 12 August 2026

Все ресурсы на складе можете брать себе, как и территорию в целом. Спасибо всем за приятные воспоминания

4 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC22 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 52175628428273577811custom 53260296348426871311custom 62849855415742679561

4 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC24 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

​​🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 « ☺️троге — это крепкая, словно семейные узы, любовь. Эта любовь тёплая, словно чашка чая, заваренная специально для тебя, словно нежные объятия, словно искренняя забота. Эта любовь рождается в результате многолетнего союза — такая прочная, глубокая. В качестве примера можно привести родительскую любовь: уважительную, заботливую и по-настоящему тёплую. » 🤍 🌟🤩Первое воспоминание, которое я храню, — это неж

custom 52267948363754010773custom 53260296348426871312custom 62849855415742679562custom 53260413815782420781custom 54429575382009404951

26 Jun 2026, 18:49 UTC30 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🌟🤩 Что же делать… Я боюсь совершать ошибки, мне нельзя совершать ошибки! Ох, Богиня, был ли я прав? Прошу, дай же мне знак… Мне правда нужно быть начеку, иначе, боюсь, может случиться что-то… Феу, как в прошлый раз, на удивление легко пробрался ко мне, хотя я так пытался следовать его советам. Ахх! Балбес! Зелье невидимости так легко помогло ему проскочить ко мне. Интересно, как долго он слушал наш с Эйсом разговор?

custom 52175628428273577813custom 52267948363754010773

26 Jun 2026, 18:46 UTC30 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

​​🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Вечер. Тёплый летний бриз дует прямо в помещение храма, чуть теребя перья парня, сидящего внутри. Вы заходите внутрь, ожидая, что вас снова тепло встретят, но хранитель храма выглядел обеспокоенным. Вы постучали по колонне, дабы привлечь его внимание. Тот вздрогнул и посмотрел на вас. Обеспокоенное лицо быстро сменилось расслабленным, и он улыбнулся. — ☺️х, это же снова вы! Давно не виделись, — крылатый з

custom 52175628428273577813custom 52267948363754010773

8 Jun 2026, 16:04 UTC285 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Был ли Агапи у вас? (^o^) #арт , #щп

custom 52267948363754010775custom 54429575382009404954custom 53260296348426871313custom 49046403990431998071custom 52175628428273577811

4 Jun 2026, 10:01 UTC41 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Цыпочки мои!! Раз уж вам так понравился мой рилс, расскажу немного про себя😁 Я мама двух ангелочков и жена своего любимого мужа Валерии❤️‍🔥🥰 Я снимаю влоги та делюсь с вами замечательными рецептами! за такое и подписку не жалко!! 😅😅 обязательно ставим лайкосики, всех целую!!! 😘😘😘 #щп

custom 52267948363754010773custom 53260413815782420783custom 52175628428273577811custom 52831834534146461611

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Agapi_HappyNation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 870,513 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“(архив) Σε αγαπώ !! 🪉” (@Agapi_HappyNation), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Agapi_HappyNation.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.