Channel
@ActualiteCrypto
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
203subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001297969907 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ActualiteCrypto |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ActualiteCrypto |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 18:22 | 203 | -2 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 205 | -4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 209 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 210 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 211 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 212 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:40 | 212 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 October 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
9 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2021 to 12 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 1 month. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Tweet d'un membre du congrès américain à propos d'une monnaie centrale gérée directement par la banque centrale. https://twitter.com/RepTomEmmer/status/1481283945492852743?t=CTDXnIt5xtm6RGvvHpj_EA&s=19 Il explique qu'il pense que c'est une invasion incroyable dans la vie privée des gens et que ça ne devrait pas exister. Cela donne un point de défaut unique et centrale. Si jamais la FED se fait hacker, toutes les don…
👍5❤1👏1
Autre considération de privacy : Il y a 4 types d'adresses sur Bitcoin (P2PKH commençant par le chiffre 1, P2SH commençant par le nombre 3, Bech32 commençant par bc1, Bech32m avec l'activation de taproot). Si vous avez une adresse du type A, quand vous faites une transaction, vous générez une adresse de change du même type (A donc). C'est comme ça que la majorité des wallets fonctionnent. Si vous envoyez des BTC à…
Certains donnent des conseils à longueur de journée concernant la privacy etc. Utilisez toujours des adresses différentes ! Mais en attendant, utiliser n'importe quel wallet qui n'est pas un full node, ça revient à envoyer comme message "Hello, je peux avoir la liste des BTCs possédés par l'adresse A, B, C, D, E ?" à un serveur qu'on ne connait pas. Si tu gères le serveur, tu te retrouve avec une liste de toutes le…
130 millions de $ de crypto hackés depuis Bitmart.
Comment se passe ce début de bearmarket ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Les frais de transaction ne sont qu'un proxy de l'utilité de la blockchain. Virtuellement, la demande en stockage est infinie. Personnellement, je paie mon cloud 30€ par an pour 200 Go. Si demain une blockchain offre des frais de transaction bas, je vais juste résilier mon abonnement et backup mes données directement sur la blockchain. Donc fondamentalement, une blockchain est obligé d'avoir un coût intrinsèque à to…
Du coup pour info : il n'y a rien d'exploitable sur un graphique. Des gens compétents utilisent des algos avancés, avec des maths qui vous dépassent, qui tourne h24, analysent toutes les stratégies possibles et imaginables pour gagner de l'argent. Donc non, il n'est pas possible de gagner de l'argent en se basant sur la courbe. En analysant les cryptos de manière fondamentale, c'est possible, même si c'est une mau…
Au delà du shitcoin le prix est actuellement sur un gros support journalier, faire attention au cassage du triangle par le haut qui pourrait annoncer une nouvelle hausse. Si le prix ne parvient pas a sortir du triangle par le haut alors direction la prochaine zone de support ≈ 0.33 - 0.35 Zone support suivant ≈ 0.24 Les mecs qui font de l'analyse graphique crypto sont vraiment marrants. Ils utilisent les services …
Oubliez cette idée de prix qui est fonction de l'offre et de la demande. Ce raisonnement n'est valable que pour les biens qui sont vendus par leur producteur à des clients qui vont les consommer. C'est un raisonnement qui ne s'applique pas à un marché financier comme Bitcoin. Effectivement c'est le cas pour des produits de la vie : si le prix des voitures Tesla baisse à 100€, tout le monde en voudra une, si le prix …
👎1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Le prix en ETH affiché pendant une enchère chez Sotheby.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ActualiteCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Comment se passe ce début de bearmarket ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2021 to 12 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Actualités & Facts Crypto” (@ActualiteCrypto), 203 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ActualiteCrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.