Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Active Club Hellas | 🇬🇷

@ActiveClubHellas

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

489subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003008092632
TypeChannel
Username@ActiveClubHellas
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ActiveClubHellas

Growth

488489488.56 Aug 2026, 07:22 — 488 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:48 — 488 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:03 — 489 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 07:226 Aug 2026, 22:03
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 488–489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 22:03489+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:48488no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:22488first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 25 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
366.4%
avg views ÷ 489 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,790
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held18 (25 February 20263 August 2026)
Views total7,167
Reactions total167
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,147 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 500146588406618742743237.7%
40835.6%
🔥20618.0%
696.02%
👌232.01%
❤‍🔥60.523%
🕊20.174%
😁10.087%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC≈1,420 views51 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

“The sun will rise and we will try again”

48🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC156 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @WhiteLadsVideo

Action Today Victory Tomorrow- Will2Rise.com

🔥203

30 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC251 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @hellasdefenderssPhoto

Athens Youth Front Summer Party 🔴⚪️⚫️

🔥35

29 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTC≈5,340 views58 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

At the capital of the nationalist north

🔥50👌8

16 Jun 2026, 15:28 UTC920 views65 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

"Inspired by the Active Club model and the 3.0 approach, youth clubs are growing fast. And that’s a good thing. Will2Rise is proud to support young guys who are choosing discipline over drift. Instead of sitting online, instead of doom-scrolling and spiraling into nihilism, they’re training, organizing, building real-world bonds. They’re learning structure. Accountability. Physical culture. Brotherhood. When I came

custom 5001465884066187427487❤‍🔥6👌2🔥2

11 Jun 2026, 02:38 UTC≈4,210 views92 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ꮤᚺᛁᛏ𐌄 ᛒOᛉ 𐌔𐌵ᛖᛖ𐌄ᚱ 🏴

custom 500146588406618742780👌10🕊2

5 Jun 2026, 04:35 UTC≈1,600 views91 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

53custom 500146588406618742734👌31

15 May 2026, 13:42 UTC≈5,740 views118 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

𝕰𝖚𝖗𝖔𝖕𝖊 𝕵𝖊𝖚𝖓𝖊𝖘𝖘𝖊 𝕽é𝖛𝖔𝖑𝖚𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓 🇬🇷🇫🇷

custom 50014658840661874279414🔥9😁1

24 Apr 2026, 09:52 UTC≈1,230 views73 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @activedietslandPhoto

"He who sweats more in training bleeds less in battle"

45custom 5001465884066187427208

19 Apr 2026, 20:01 UTC≈2,720 views79 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

3.0 Lifestyle with comrades from the Youth Front ⚡️ Active Club Hellas 🇬🇷

57🔥97custom 50014658840661874276

18 Apr 2026, 18:56 UTC≈1,070 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ActiveClubEngland2Video

ITV ❌ SBD ✅ GET ACTIVE.

252

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ActiveClubHellas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 100,478 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Active Club Hellas | 🇬🇷” (@ActiveClubHellas), 489 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ActiveClubHellas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.