Schroedingers Strait & Ammunition
🤯1

Channel
@Absick_VBCG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
166subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002452833029 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Absick_VBCG |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Absick_VBCG |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 166 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 165 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 165 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (12 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 41 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
41 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 34.1% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 34.1% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 14.6% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Schroedingers Strait & Ammunition
🤯1
Stop is set at average entry, which is 81.6$ If stocks deflate more oil can easily come down a lot despite all the noise. Rate bet is won and the hedge for it (oil long) is green, dont need to take a lot of risk in this environment.
Opinion: AI IPOs are the biggest exit liquidity move in history. End of march this year NASDAQ 100 changed its listing rules. Instead of having to trade a minimum of 3 months with a free stock float of 10% to get listed, it is now 15 days with a 5% float. Why is this so important? Because now 401ks and index fund automatically have to buy those stocks whether people want them or not. Simultaneously AI companies ar…
🔥3
Bond market doesnt like FED decision at all, long end yields up 1.3% (10y) , 2.1% (20y) and 2.3% (30y). Stage set for oil price inflation to continue.
Oil went straight through so didnt get an entry first but now its retesting the green box. I entered WTIOIL on HL now at 83.5$ smallish and then add on the way down to 80$. Loosing 77$ area would be invalidation for me. Not only because of the trade setup itself but also because longing oil hedges that big interest rate bet i have on HL/Polymarket a bit. Position size will be smaller compared to the 65$ breakout in …
❤2
Heres a little cheat sheet with the combination of the 3 and the respective outlook for risk assets. Hope that helps, speak soon 🫡
✍1
The 3 important charts that are leading indicators for risk assets. No need to overcomplicate things from the swing trade or investors POV. Those charts will tell you where we go before we go there and then I believe one should position accordingly. With oil its a bit more nuanced, price going up can be bad as well as price going down. In this environment price going down is worse because it obviously signals weak g…
🔥2🙏2
Markets are in that classic summer hole and although theres a lot of things going in geopolitics you dont see any strong reaction to it. An indicator to the fact i always try to emphasize a lot: Markets (almost always) move first! The narrative comes after as humans try to rationalize the direction the market moved with some arbitrary narrative. Realistically speaking the situation for crude oil for example is much…
❤10💯2🔥2
Мой знакомый из одного бай-сайда написал хороший комментарий: "В понедельник возвращаюсь в Нью-Йорк и снова включаюсь в работу. Тактически спор между быками и медведями сейчас, на мой взгляд, зависит от того, какой фактор вы считаете главным источником риска — своего рода первой главной компонентой, PC1: - геополитика; - жизнеспособность маржинальной модели frontier AI; - тезис о том, что инвестиционный цикл достиг…
I have a real infinite money glitch: In 2 weeks the FED will decide on interest rates. There is a neglegible chance they will hike rates (but that doesnt matter for what im doing and you can hedge that but for sure they will not decrease). Last week i have seen this big red candle to under 0.6 for the outcome "no change". It went back up quickly but i still thought its a good price to buy at around 0.8 and place li…
❤2👍2🔥2✍1
https://x.com/saylor/status/2076638696053276748?s=20 "The infinite money glitch" Remember to unfollow the people that were telling you Saylor is Jesus. The best thing for crypto would be him getting liquidated and a large amount of individuals (hopefully you too if you sold and have cash) buys up the cheap BTC and takes it in self custody. Digital gold should have a broad distribution of holders.
💯4🔥3
X here (The post, not the link) Ukraine Russia situation completely off the radar although its escalating similar.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Absick_VBCG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Versteckte Bank Capital Group 2” (@Absick_VBCG), 166 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Absick_VBCG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.