Channel
@Absentsky
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
253subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001451994062 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Absentsky |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Absentsky |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 253 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 252 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 252 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 6 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (6 July 2025 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 117 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
236 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 128 | 54.2% | |
| 🔥 | 64 | 27.1% | |
| 💔 | 25 | 10.6% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 3.81% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 1.69% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.27% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.847% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.424% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 236reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2025 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сейчас я хочу замедлиться, погрузиться в зелень и солнечный свет, плыть с облаками, дать мыслям свободно течь и сплетаться по-новому... Грядет насыщенная мероприятиями осень на фоне большой педагогической нагрузки. Мой тренер говорит: «Ты здесь не чтобы думать, а чтобы делать!» Как ни странно, в академической работе, которая, казалось бы, интеллектуальная, порой складывается то же ощущение. Оно уместно на спортивной…
❤15🔥5💔3👍2
Онлайн трансляция конфереции "Имагинативная философия" будет на моем ютуб-канале: https://youtu.be/mPpDckdc-DA
❤15🔥2
⚡️Сформирована программа независимой конференции «Имагинативная философия: онтология воображения, утопическое становление и иные миры»: 11:00 - Начало. Вступительное слово организаторов. 11:20 - Егор Дорожкин «Неадекватная реальность: имагинативизм и двойная ловушка воображения». 11:50 - Антон Заньковский «Спекулятивный субъект имагинативного Абсолюта». 12:20 - Александр Ветушинский «Материалистическая теория в…
🔥10❤2🙏1
вышла петиция в поддержку светланы месяц, старшей научной сотрудницы иф ран, одной из лучших современных российских антиковедов. в данный момент она находится под домашним арестом. петицию организовывает майкл чейз, историк античной философии. к сожалению, именно такие дни и укрепляют международные академические отношения. хотелось бы, чтобы подобных поводов было как можно меньше
❤10
Светлана Месяц - безупречный специалист. Слушал её лекции, читал тексты. Очередной рубеж цивилизации и гуманизма рушится на наших глазах. Не первый и не последний.
💔11
Вчера я видел, как Светлану Месяц, крупнейшего и умнейшего специалиста по неоплатонизму и Аристотелю, широко известного и уважаемого в гуманитарных и университетских кругах, конвоир заводит в наручниках в зал судебных заседаний и запирает в «стакане», и слышал, как судья и сторона обвинения говорят о мошенничестве в особо крупном размере в связи с переводами Аристотеля. Поверить в услышанное до сих пор сложно. Я не з…
💔11🌚2
⚡️ До окончания приёма заявок на конференцию «Имагинативная философия» остаётся всего неделя! ✍️ Если вы планировали подать заявку (а вы ведь планировали, признайтесь?) — самое время это сделать! Тем временем публикуем список основных докладов: 1. Антон Сюткин «Два исхода из Гегеля: материалистическая диалектика и/или романтизм». 2. Антон Заньковский «Спекулятивный субъект имагинативного Абсолюта». 3. Максим Ух…
🔥8❤6
Сделал себе подарок на День святого Патрика. Думаю весна - прекрасное время для такого чтения. Помню, что и Хайдеггера впервые читал весной, и Бланшо. У обоих какая-то сила и свежесть роста, фюсис, прорастающие сквозь бетонную самоуверенность обыденного языка. Еще немного и будто наивное, но все же могучее и сложное. И да, конечно, в эти времена нам всем нужно учиться прорастать сквозь бетон...
❤13🔥5
Рубрика по имагинативному реализму в журнале Неприкосновенный Запас была лишь началом. Теперь мы запускаем независимую конференцию «Имагинативная Философия: онтология воображения, утопическое становление и иные миры», которая состоится 25 июня 2026 года в Нижнем Новгороде. За новостями можете следить в тг-канале конференции: https://t.me/imaginative_philosophy
🔥10❤5
Нечеловечески красивый проект Metaxy перезапускает сайт с крайне интересными текстами. По любезному предложению Антона Заньковского там републикована и моя прошлогодняя статья об имагинативном реализме. Рад, что она нашла единомышленников. Работа над текстом велась не только разумом, но и сердцем - ни в каком другом я так себе еще не доверял. Как если бы спонтанность природы-воображения, выступающая объектом эссе, в…
❤14🌚2👍1🔥1
Забавно наблюдать, как критика модерного утопизма у мыслителей «высокого постмодерна» в XX веке переродилась в свою карикатурную форму у представителей «низкого постмодерна» уже в нашем столетии. Первые указывали, что вырывающиеся из пут старой догматической христианской метафизики революционеры в действительности оказываются такими же религиозными фанатиками и инквизиторами, как те, кого они отрицают. Они меняют бо…
❤10😁3🔥2🤔1
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Absentsky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 533,989 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Absentsky” (@Absentsky), 253 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Absentsky.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.