Channel
@About_Photo_Critique
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
677subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001487424218 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @About_Photo_Critique |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/About_Photo_Critique |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 677 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 677 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 October 2025 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,886 |
| Reactions total | 41 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
206 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 97 | 47.1% | |
| ❤ | 55 | 26.7% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 12.1% | |
| ⚡ | 9 | 4.37% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 4.37% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 0.971% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.971% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 0.971% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.971% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.485% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.485% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.485% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 206reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
عکاس: زینب حسینی نام عکس: Untitled منتقد: منیژه لطفیانی در نگاه نخست، عکس ما را با موقعیتی ناآشنا مواجه میکند: پیکرهی بیسرِ یک مانکن که در فضای یک بالکن قرار گرفته و رو به چشمانداز شهری ایستاده است. بالکن، خود، فضایی میان دو وضعیت است؛ نه کاملاً به خلوت درون خانه تعلق دارد و نه بخشی از فضای عمومی شهر است وسازکاری برای قاببندی جهان است. شهر از خلال دهانهای محدود دیده میشود؛ گویی آنچه بیرون قرار دارد، پیشاپیش …
👏6🔥2❤1👍1💯1
| زینب حسینی | Untitled | @About_Photo_Critique
👏3❤2
#نکته The concept that is now known as "Luminance" was for many years designated by the term "Brightness". This led to much confusion between the objective concept of "Brightness" as intensity per unit of projected area and the subjective concept of "Brightness" which referred to a sensation in the consciousness of a human observer. The newer term "Luminance" was adopted to avoid this confusion. From "Optics" by …
👍5❤1
... ادامهی متن از پست قبل آمبولانس دیگر تنها وسیلهای برای نجات نیست؛ به نشانهای از وضعیت اضطرار بدل شده است. حضور آن، ذهن مخاطب را به مجموعهای از تجربهها ارجاع میدهد؛ صدای آژیر، انتظار در راهروهای بیمارستان، لحظههای میان امید و ناامیدی، اخبار بحران، خاطرهی بیماری و مواجهه با مرگ. به همین دلیل، معنا دیگر در خود شیء قرار ندارد، بلکه در شبکهای از خاطرات و تداعیهایی شکل میگیرد که هر مخاطب با خود به تصویر میآ…
👍6❤2
عکاس: سیاوُش اجلالی نام عکس: ــ منتقد: فریبا صفی جهانشاهی سکوت اضطرار؛ خوانشی میانرشتهای از بازنمایی رنج، حافظه و امید مقدمه برخی عکسها تنها ثبت یک لحظهاند؛ لحظهای که در گذر زمان منجمد شده و نقش آن صرفاً ثبت یک واقعیت بیرونی است. اما گروهی دیگر از عکسها، از سطح بازنمایی فراتر میروند و به بستری برای اندیشیدن تبدیل میشوند. این آثار فراتر از آنکه چیزی را نشان میدهند، مخاطب را به تأمل دربارهی آنچه نمیبیند و…
👍3❤2
| سیاوُش اجلالی | ــ | @About_Photo_Critique
👍5🥰1
عکاس: شادیآفرین آرش نام عکس: ــ منتقد: حمید بهنامفر سطح صاف و نسبتاً چروک تشک، تداعیگر حضور بدن است بدون آنکه خود بدن حاضر باشد. «غیبت بدن» در میان نشانههای حضورش، منطق «ردپا»ی دریدایی است که در آن، هر نشانه حامل ردِ چیزی است که غایب است. حضور کامل، همواره با غیاب گره خورده است. در اینجا، تشک، نه محل حضور، بلکه رد آن است؛ یک حافظهی مادی از زیستن. تشک نارنجی که بستر آسایش است، از زمین سبز جدا شده، گویی بدن، …
👍10❤1🔥1
| شادیآفرین آرش | ــ | @About_Photo_Critique
👍6
عکاس: حمید بهنامفر نام عکس: Transformation منتقد: فریبا صفی جهانشاهی در این تصویر با اثری مواجه هستیم که آگاهانه از بازنمایی واقعیت فاصله میگیرد و به قلمرو ادراک، سرعت و تجربهی ذهنی وارد میشود. عکس بیش از آنکه یک «ثبت» باشد، نوعی بازسازی بصری از حرکت، عبور و فروپاشی فضا در اثر شتاب است؛ تصویری که نگاه را به درون خود میکشد و اجازهی ایستادن نمیدهد. از نظر ترکیببندی، ساختار تصویر کاملاً بر محور مرکزگرایی شک…
👍8❤4🔥1
| حمید بهنامفر | Transformation | @About_Photo_Critique
❤7👍6🔥2
بیرون از نقد... نگاهی کوتاه به ابعاد حقوقی و مرزهای قانون در عکاسی خیابانی در گفتگویی که با خانوم الناز زارع، وکیل پایه یک دادگستری داشتم. پرسش: من حمید بهنامفر هستم، حدود 19 ساله که به شکل جدی عکاسی و نقد عکس انجام میدم. یه سؤال حقوقی در مورد عکاسی خیابونی دارم که تا الان توی بحثها و فرومهای مرتبط با عکاسی، به پاسخ مدون و قطعیای نرسیدهم. در مقولهی عکاسی خیابونی و عکاسی از مردم توی محیطهای عمومی آیا قانونی …
❤9👍3
... ادامهی متن از پست قبل تاریکی گستردهی تصویر، صرفاً پسزمینه نیست؛ بلکه عنصری فعال و معناساز است. این تاریکی را میتوان نماد ساختارهای نامرئی اما مسلط دانست. ساختارهایی که بدون اعمال خشونت مستقیم، از طریق سکوت، حذف و بیاعتنایی عمل میکنند. سکوت سنگین تصویر و فقدان هرگونه اعتراض آشکار، نمونهای از خشونت نمادین است؛ خشونتی که طبیعیشده، درونیشده و بیصدا عمل میکند. سوژه فریاد نمیزند، اما ایستاده است و اثرش را …
👍3🔥3⚡1👎1🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @About_Photo_Critique. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 257,272 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حوالی نقد عکس” (@About_Photo_Critique), 677 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/About_Photo_Critique.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.