Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for РЕСТ🪦ᥲbιⳋᥲιᥣ🔮

Channel

РЕСТ🪦ᥲbιⳋᥲιᥣ🔮

@AbigailPelicanTown

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

45subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003177959258
TypeChannel
Username@AbigailPelicanTown
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AbigailPelicanTown

Growth

44464511 August 2026 — 45 subscribers12 August 2026 — 45 subscribers18 August 2026 — 46 subscribers26 August 2026 — 45 subscribers2 September 2026 — 44 subscribers11 September 2026 — 45 subscribers11 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 30 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44–46 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 07:3745+1
2 Sept 2026, 02:2344-1
26 Aug 2026, 04:2945-1
18 Aug 2026, 21:2646+1
12 Aug 2026, 03:1645no change
11 Aug 2026, 23:1645first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

122 reactions across 19 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1814.8%
👻1814.8%
custom 52966362659432951901512.3%
🎉108.20%
👀108.20%
custom 532376985497976796486.56%
custom 520642998265343141343.28%
43.28%
custom 532332485341822925132.46%
🌚32.46%
🎃32.46%
🐳32.46%
😭32.46%
🤔32.46%
21.64%
🎄21.64%
🎅21.64%
👨‍💻21.64%
🙈21.64%
🦄21.64%
5 further kinds54.10%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @pelicantownn

ᯓ★. Рест. ♡₊˚ Ожидание сети. . . , , Абигейл откладывает ведение блога до 14 августа. Просьба не тревожить её и не отписываться от канала!

🎉1

3 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC46 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Эрнест спекся(Не в прямом смысле) и шлепнулся без сознания... 😥 Я его не откачаю!! Придется нести в больничку

1🎉1👍1💊1😨1

3 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC49 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⭑𝆺𝅥🤨 𝆭 💜𝆹𝅥٭⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘ ╭ ┈ ໒ ꒰ ´🪟🏝🐿🐅 ꒱ .... 💜⃟〄Барабанная дробь... МЫ НАКОНЕЦ-ТО В БАНЕ! ЮХУУУ!! Ну, через пару минут начнется отчет. Я принесла заранее холодненького пива (не, ну а что? После жары в самый раз:D). Интересно: кто в этот раз выиграет? ╰ ─────────────────╯ ─ׅ──꯭ׂ🤩🤩 ─⟡─ׅ──꯭ׂ─꯭ ──ׅ ─⟡ 𓈒⠀𓂃⠀⠀˖⠀𓇬⠀˖⠀⠀𓂃⠀𓈒

🎃1🎉1👍1👻1😈1

2 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC39 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

༶•┈┈⛧┈◌🤩◌┈⛧┈┈•༶ СЕГОДНЯ Я... Ничего не сделала, но почему-то устала. Неприкольное чувство. Я с кровати почти не вставала...ну, максимум за чаем выходила. Смотрела какие-то видео, потом снова спала. Завтра надо будет чем-то заняться, а не просто тупить в потолок. ∘₊𖤐───💜───𖤐₊∘

👍2🎉1👨‍💻1👻1custom 52064299826534314131custom 52966362659432951901

2 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC35 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🗿Будут ли ещё раскладики на таро?? Хотелось бы иногда видеть эту деятельность в блоге, очень интересно) 🥛ои хорошие, конечно же будут!! Могу выделить отдельный день на это, хотя я почти всегда свободна... Вообщем - пишите в любой момент свои вопросы (главное указывайте, что хотите гадание) и я обязательно сделаю вам раскладик. Своим прекрасным подписчикам я никогда не отказываю( ͡°з ͡°) ‧͙⁺˚*・༓☾💜💜☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙

👻2custom 52966362659432951902🎉1👍1

2 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC34 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🥛ожет у вас есть еще вопросы?

🤔3custom 52966362659432951902🎉1

2 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC32 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🗿 Можно ли гадать на себя? Мои хорошие, конечно можно, и даже иногда нужно!! Вся эта дребедень о том, что «расклад будет лгать и всё такое» — чистая ложь!! Я даже не знаю, кто такую хрень придумал. Но есть нюанс: нельзя гадать при сильных эмоциях. Поскольку в этот момент мы работаем со своим подсознанием и интуицией. А если вы будете сидеть, трясясь и рыдая (к примеру), то карты будут просто отражать ваши эмоции, а

👀2👻2🎉1👍1👨‍💻1custom 52966362659432951901custom 53237698549797679641

2 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC28 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🪑новой годой теперь..

🌚3🐳3🙈2🍌1🎉1

2 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC29 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🇯🇲 Так понимаю, вы осень почувствовали? Праздник всех духов, охота за золотой тыквой, мммм. Чудесно, как! Помню, в прошлый раз я всем гадала на таро. Весело было☺️

3🎄2🎅2🎉1👍1

2 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC28 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

☕️то за приведения у меня тут завелись?? Хаха

👻4🎃2🦄2👍1

2 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC27 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

── ・ 。☆: *.🤩 .* :☆. ── Какой раз с Эрнестом мы переносим баню? Я уже сбилась со счету. То поездка в лес, то потом другая брехня. Мдаа😭 Ну, надеюсь хоть на этой неделе все нормально будет и мы завершим этот спор 💜‧͙⁺˚*・༓☾ 💜 ☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙

👻4👀2custom 52966362659432951902🎉1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AbigailPelicanTown. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РЕСТ🪦ᥲbιⳋᥲιᥣ🔮” (@AbigailPelicanTown), 45 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AbigailPelicanTown.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.