Channel
@AbduIntheLoop
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
556subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001898663053 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AbduIntheLoop |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AbduIntheLoop |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 556 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 556 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,223 |
| Reactions total | 147 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
147 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 73 | 49.7% | |
| 😁 | 28 | 19.0% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 9.52% | |
| 🤝 | 10 | 6.80% | |
| 🕊 | 8 | 5.44% | |
| 🤗 | 7 | 4.76% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 3.40% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.68% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.68% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I feel you. This is also an issue I am always concerned about. It's not called luck, but at least knowing bad friends has taught you how the environment really went bad. And Alhamdulillah, you managed to somehow escape from them. "Lijoch masadeg." Honestly, wellahi, I am always concerned. Let alone my future children, I am concerned about my siblings and cousins. I never had a social media account until 11th grade, b…
🤗7
Signed A~
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed A~
true, me either. University Jemma'ahs change your life in a good way.
Signed A~
start a business is all I can say. I never had a milion so I don't know what to do either.
Signed A~
please stop. I'm serious. 😅
Signed A~
I have nothing to do and nothing to post either. So why not read your SMAs? This time, I want you to share something you regret doing or not doing. What have you learned from it? I will only share it here if you used #public in your message; otherwise, I will keep it to myself. Please this is not ‘Tell me your ችግር’ SMA. So don’t share me your ችግርs 🙂 https://sma.et/b/Sw76b449lc1w
😁4
Signed A~
hey it's me Coolio, you might know me from the community hike events i've hosted multiple times. (one coming very soon aswell so join up) so i ..... deleted my channel by mistake. i was trying to delete a post and instead deleted the whole channel smh. anyways this is my new channel engdi. we keep going, we keep growing. share this around the community and lets keep the momentum going ❤️ @CoolioCodes
❤2
Signed A~
If a bird falls in love with a fish, where will they live? . . They shouldn't be together in the first place. In a world full of birds, why would you go for the fish? This is not about love. Why would you take yourself to a place where you know you don't belong and try to fit in? Know your boundaries. Don't force yourself into situations where you constantly have to change your identity or live in an environment th…
🔥12😁6
Signed A~
We are still walking. Today I walked around 11 km in total for the day, with the longest straight segment being 8 km. The route: Ayat -> Meri -> CMC -> Civil Service -> Jackros Road. I have started recording my walks on Strava, and I think we can walk together too. Join the club I created below, and we would walk and hike as a community. Join "WeWalkWithAbdu" and walk with me. 🙂 https://strava.app.link/fdNSFG2Jk5b
🤣5❤2
Signed A~
which one are you?😅
😁3
Signed A~
the wait is over. play a game to win a shared pool of 500 ሮያል ከረሜላዎች. 🎉 😁 we play a game, and the game itself chooses who the loyals are. you know the spot the lie game, right? an AI has generated multiple statements based on my channel posts before. on every slide, you will be shown 3 statements, and you have to choose the lie. play the game here: https://amiloyaltoabduintheloops.online you have to be a member o…
Signed A~
Giveaway Alert !! 🎉 It's been a while since we hit 500 subscribers, and I wanted to do a giveaway for the first time. But I am mean, I will only be giving it away to a few of my loyal subscribers :) How do I choose the loyal ones? Who are the loyal ones? Stay tuned. I will post the details later :)
❤4🔥1🥰1
Signed A~
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AbduIntheLoop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 270,917 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AbduIntheLoop” (@AbduIntheLoop), 556 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AbduIntheLoop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.