Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Abdelhay Fadil Fanchannel

Channel

Abdelhay Fadil Fanchannel

@Abdelhay_fanchannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

68subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004484674880
TypeChannel
Username@Abdelhay_fanchannel
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 19 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Abdelhay_fanchannel

Growth

556861.59 August 2026 — 55 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55 subscribers24 August 2026 — 56 subscribers1 September 2026 — 57 subscribers10 September 2026 — 63 subscribers18 September 2026 — 68 subscribers9 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 40 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53–70 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:4168+5
10 Sept 2026, 17:3963+6
1 Sept 2026, 07:3757+1
24 Aug 2026, 16:2556+1
10 Aug 2026, 08:0155no change
9 Aug 2026, 04:4755first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

78 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5266.7%
67.69%
💯67.69%
👏45.13%
🏆22.56%
👍22.56%
💘22.56%
🥰22.56%
🤩11.28%
🤯11.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 22:59 UTC86 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/HAQgsGl2GQk?si=050Qx0G1LM-Kbx28

3

17 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTC44 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/Y-9QhBeeHwQ?si=Swi17K5a2kFbbEfC

2🤩1

9 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC62 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ṣalāh ist mehr als Pflicht. Ṣalāh ist Verbindung herstellen. Salam Aleikum liebe Geschwister, Viele verbinden Ṣalāh vor allem mit den fünf täglichen Gebeten. Mit Zeiten. Bewegungen. Regeln. Pflicht. Doch was, wenn Ṣalāh viel weiter ist? Was, wenn Ṣalāh nicht nur etwas ist, das du erledigst, sondern etwas, das dich zurückführt? Zur Klarheit. Zur inneren Ordnung. Zur Gegenwärtigkeit. Zur Nähe Allahs. Ṣalāh ist nich

3

7 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC53 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://youtu.be/BJlWKL46Ebw?si=YgMTBhWrKpJPXl-e

3🏆1💯1

1 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC110 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Wenn Allah Gutes in euren Herzen erkennt, wird Er euch Besseres geben als das,was euch genommen wurde." Sure al-Anfal, Vers 70 Ein göttliches Versprechen, das das Herz beruhigt: Dass das, was dir genommen wird, nicht bedeutet, dass es für immer verloren ist. Und dass Allah etwas Besseres für dich aufbewahrt. Aber zu der Zeit, von der Er weiß, dass sie gut für dich ist. Jahrelang dachte ich, Bittgebete seien nur zw

32💘2

29 Jun 2026, 17:19 UTC86 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/JkfLnf8GrF8?si=cFYNeNRAJCXL65bN

3

25 Jun 2026, 20:51 UTC65 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ein Tag fasten, ein Jahr gelöscht. Ein Tag fasten, zwei Jahre gelöscht. Ein vergangenes Jahr. Und sogar ein kommendes Jahr. Wenn ein Unternehmen so werben würde, wären wir misstrauisch. Wir würden sagen: Das klingt nach Manipulation. Nach einem Versprechen, das Menschen lockt, ohne sie wirklich zu verändern. Aber wenn dieselbe Logik der Religion zugeschrieben wird, nehmen viele sie hin, ohne zu fragen. Genau hier beg

💯32👏2

25 Jun 2026, 18:46 UTC30 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/o9h69S_hm4g?si=r4CMTIswxTUn2HSH

3

24 Jun 2026, 14:05 UTC68 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Frage zur heutigen Predigt: "Lebst du deine Wahrheit oder fürchtest du die Menschen": Frage: *Was soll man tun, wenn man über jemanden geurteilt oder eine wertende Frage gestellt hat — z. B. „Warum ist er so?“ oder „Warum isst er so viel Schokolade?“ — es später bereut und Sorge hat, die Konsequenzen selbst erleben zu müssen?* Antwort: Zunächst ist wichtig zu verstehen, was hier überhaupt passiert ist. Ein Urteil

3🥰2🏆1

24 Jun 2026, 14:04 UTC53 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/8agFOuCd4Ik?si=dNJmDcIN7jkXHBUW

3

22 Jun 2026, 18:09 UTC120 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Steht uns eine Neuformatierung der Erde bevor – wie zur Zeit von Nuh? ❓ War die Welt zur Zeit von Nuh technologisch fortschrittlicher, als viele denken? ❓ Gibt es Parallelen zwischen damals und heute? ❓ Welche Warnungen wurden von den Menschen ignoriert? 🎥 Ein spannender Vortrag, der zum Nachdenken anregt und neue Perspektiven eröffnet. 🤔 Was denkst du dazu? https://youtu.be/Pcu_zkDRjFw?si=r-WikoupMX4a5arX Teleg

31🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Abdelhay_fanchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Abdelhay Fadil Fanchannel” (@Abdelhay_fanchannel), 68 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Abdelhay_fanchannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.