https://youtu.be/Fe-8TpfNgPs?si=U_KPbtkBlAPfL4Ai

Channel
القناة الرسمية للشيخ المحدث: عبدالله السعد
@Aaalsaad7
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,335subscribers
-160 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001316418102 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Aaalsaad7 |
| Created | 10 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Aaalsaad7 |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 22:11 | 14,335 | +2 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 16:00 | 14,333 | +2 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 00:15 | 14,331 | -1 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 16:58 | 14,332 | -11 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:20 | 14,343 | -9 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:31 | 14,352 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:41 | 14,355 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:41 | 14,359 | +1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:36 | 14,358 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 14,361 | +4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:51 | 14,357 | -3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:19 | 14,360 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:10 | 14,362 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:31 | 14,365 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:40 | 14,368 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 14,376 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:20 | 14,382 | -6 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:14 | 14,388 | +4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:21 | 14,384 | +2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:54 | 14,382 | first reading |
Engagement
148 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.72%
- avg views ÷ 14,335 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 677
- 45 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 45
- of 148 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 148 (29 July 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 30,467 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 19:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 45 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
https://youtu.be/OYyChghEEIE?si=1wM4kKFxtG_Ol1ta
https://youtu.be/wUXcoAcaSKQ?si=CClUuPLd1YJh69s2
الصحيح أن الجمعة لا تؤدى قبل الزوال. https://t.me/Aaalsaad7
https://youtu.be/pLKRxyERcRQ?si=MeLf9jG7B86MYArT
https://youtu.be/AOJaWWfd1iY?si=EHcKHGoAmsnS5tKF
العبادات لا يوجد فيها قياس. https://t.me/Aaalsaad7
https://youtu.be/pY6MfC_rW9A?si=GUKXPWLRxtgEdui4
https://youtu.be/4tZLOIB4Euc?si=jGXufbxQwdxZAdwG
عبد الله ابن لهيعة حديثه على ثلاثة أقسام، قسم من روى عنه *بعد* احتراق كتبه وهو أضعف الأقسام، وقسم روى عنه من كتبه *قبل* أن تحترق، وقسم من لازمه روى عنه من كتبه واستمر يكتب عنه، وأعني به تلميذه عبد الله بن وهب. عبد الله بن وهب تلميذ ابن لهيعة ويروي عنه وهو أقوى الأقسام في روايته عن ابن لهيعة ومع ذلك لا يصح. https://t.me/Aaalsaad7
https://youtu.be/Vo-0HcGmUnE?si=bbRHzuKFqd_abgnU
معرفة كون الراوي ضعيف أم لا يسير على من يسره الله لكن الصعب هل هذا الراوي يُكتب حديثه أم لا؟ فهذه مسألة دقيقة وصعبة مثلاً فلان لا يُكتب حديثه أي أصبح وجوده وعدمه سواء بخلاف لو قلنا يُكتب حديثه أي يتقوى مع غيره كعبد الله ابن لهيعة يتقوى بغيره. https://t.me/Aaalsaad7
Showing the 12 most recent of 148 posts we hold for @Aaalsaad7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@alkalimaalttayiba · 38,31212 postsمسابقة شرح كتاب الصوم
@eulim4 · 1,7093 postsبناء الملكة الحديثيّة
@malaka_hadithiya · 1,4013 postsḌhul Ḣijjah
@dhulhijjahbeneficials · 2011 postفوائد علمية أبو يحيى
@fauaid_abuyahya · 3641 postقناة أهل الأثر العلمية
@gsllslb · 1,4231 postخَدِيــجَة.
@Kh1714_1417 · 311 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@abdulazizatarefe · 58,910
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
@drr_altarefe · 29,048
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
@SoundBooks1 · 38,524
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
@s_eulim · 96,043
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@saadalkhthlan · 36,168
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
@binothaimeen · 39,703
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 30 August 2026
@fiiqh · 28,563
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
@shm50011 · 38,352
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 30 August 2026
@Quransr · 155,605
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026
@grajhi · 34,535
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“القناة الرسمية للشيخ المحدث: عبدالله السعد” (@Aaalsaad7), 14,335 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aaalsaad7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.