Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

甜甜的后花园💕

@AaVa123321

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,824subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003802786244
TypeChannel
Username@AaVa123321
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AaVa123321

Growth

1,8241,8351,829.59 August 2026 — 1,835 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,833 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,824 subscribers9 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,822–1,837 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 04:331,824-9
9 Aug 2026, 10:321,833-2
9 Aug 2026, 03:451,835first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
82.2%
avg views ÷ 1,824 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,500
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.127%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026
Posts held20 (13 July 202617 July 2026)
Views total3,000
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 08:25 UTC≈1,580 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

✨ 命运揭晓时刻 ✨ 上城区嫩甜甜p半价卷 开奖了 抽奖人数:84,发言达标人数:67,抽奖号数:95 1. zz【祝福1次】 中得:p半价优惠卷 2. 二龙湖浩【祝福1次】 中得:50红包🧧 3. abc爱abc 中得:50红包🧧 抽奖说明: ❶刷屏、灌水、纯表情、复制粘贴、无意义对话、删除消息、撤回内容等,一律视为无效发言,取消中奖资格!请用心交流! ❷请三天内约课,五天内完成上课,因炸号,退群,注销账号等原因,超时未兑换等原因的,不予兑奖! ❸活动最终解释权归本群管理团队所有。 ⚠️自言自语刷屏再删消息的都会被永久封禁,且中奖无效!删消息必永久封禁! ❗️❗️❗️中奖人员拉黑30天,出报告解黑,连续中奖3次不去或不出报告永久拉黑 兑奖请联系: @HJB666666 🔍 杜绝黑幕,点击查看本次开奖全程验证

2

17 Jul 2026, 04:00 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💐💐💐开奖了💐💐💐 【杭州大学】认证教师·甜甜 @HJB666666 上榜福利 开奖了! 本期总参与人数: 1466 1- 老毛子 (真岸纯水) (消息数 6) 获得:甜甜 @HJB666666 1p半价优惠券 2- 小妖孽 (消息数 5) 获得:甜甜 @HJB666666 200优惠券 3- 不灭飞龙 (消息数 5) 获得:甜甜 @HJB666666 200优惠券 4- 别动她 (消息数 5) 获得:甜甜 @HJB666666 100优惠券 5- 银河漫游指南 (消息数 5) 获得:甜甜 @HJB666666 100优惠券 6- x k (消息数 2) 获得:甜甜 @HJB666666 100优惠券 7- 棒打狗 (消息数 5) 获得:甜甜 @HJB666666 赞助·52红包 谨祝中奖用户大吉大利万事顺意

16 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC≈1,290 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💐💐💐开奖了💐💐💐 甜甜宝贝~福利来袭 开奖了! 本期总参与人数: 4955 1- 忱迷 (翻倍1) 获得:甜甜老师半价P 2- 吉吉吉 (翻倍1) 获得:200优惠券 3- 劣质热吻 (翻倍1) 获得:200优惠券 4- 尕筱澄 (翻倍1) 获得:100优惠券 5- 空有城府无相伴 (翻倍1) 获得:100优惠券 6- 靓够洒脱 (翻倍1) 获得:100优惠券 谨祝中奖用户大吉大利万事顺意

1

15 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,280 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💐💐💐开奖了💐💐💐 @HJB666666 甜甜福利抽奖 开奖了! 本期总参与人数: 5014 1- 情态 (翻倍1) 获得:半价p 2- 难为你了兄弟 (翻倍1) 获得:二百优惠券 3- 爱吃甲鱼烧牛蛙 (翻倍1201.0) 获得:二百优惠券 4- 道德天尊 (翻倍1) 获得:一百优惠券 5- 羽绒服不够热 (翻倍1) 获得:一百优惠券 6- James Harden(已岸) (翻倍202.0) 获得:一百优惠券 谨祝中奖用户大吉大利万事顺意

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AaVa123321. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 757,885 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“甜甜的后花园💕” (@AaVa123321), 1,824 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AaVa123321.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.