3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 398–399 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 09:16
399
+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:50
398
no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:52
398
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 23 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
64.2%
avg views ÷ 399 subscribers
Avg views / post
256
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held
19 (23 May 2024 – 26 July 2026)
Views total
769
Reactions total
50
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
481 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
261
54.3%
❤
139
28.9%
👏
50
10.4%
😢
20
4.16%
🤬
5
1.04%
🙏
4
0.832%
👎
2
0.416%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 481reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2024 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
نقد مخالفان و موافقان مشروطه...
از چند سال پیش قلم های مربوط به جنبش سیاسی تورک ها جسورتر شده و به آسیب شناسی های مختلف، از جمله آسیب شناسی مشروطه پرداخته اند که اخیرا هم این تنش جدی تر شده که البته بنده آن را به فال نیک میگیرم...
اما معایب و نواقص ما در نقد مشروطه...
۱- طرفداران اندیشه ی "غیر ملی" بودن مشروطه و مشروطه چیان، چاقوی تیزی به دست گرفته اند برای جراحی آن که این چاقو میتوانست کمی ملایم ببُرد...
۲- طیف مق…
«اوزگه کولگه سینده بوی آتماز چینار»
قدرت های بزرگ هیچگاه از جنبش ها حمایت نمی کنند، از آنها ابزار می سازند.
تبدیل شدن به ابزار، پایان استقلال یک جنبش است.
پیرامون خود کم ندیده ایم ابزارهایی که گمان می کردند بخشی از معادله اند، اما پس از آن، نخستین حذف شدگان بودند.
سارای شهبازی
ایمضایا قوشولون⬇️⬇️
@az_imza
آنچه این روزها با عنوان «تاکتیک» از آن یاد میشود، در واقع محکی است برای سنجش ثبات معیارهای یک جنبش. تاکتیک در معنای واقعی سیاسی، ابزاری برای پیشبرد راهبرد است؛ نه مجوزی برای چشمپوشی از اصول و ارزشها.
به همین دلیل، صرف وجود دشمن مشترک هرگز نمیتواند توجیهی برای نادیده گرفتن کارنامه، روشها یا پیشینهٔ جریانهای دیگر باشد. اگر معیارهای یک جنبش با تغییر موازنههای سیاسی به راحتی جابهجا شود، آنچه تغییر کرده فقط یک تاک…
به نظر می رسد فرهنگ بچسب سازی در بخشی از جریان های ایرانشهری نیز از تحولات روز عقب نمانده است؛ اگر تا دیروز هر مطالبه گر ترک با عنوان «تجزیه طلب»از دایره گفت و گو خارج می شد، امروز همان نقش را برچسب«پانترک اللهی» بر عهده گرفته است؛ بی آنکه کوچک ترین تغییری در شیوه مواجهه با اصل مسئله ایجاد شده باشد.
در کنار این برچسب زنی، این گزاره نیز به کرات مطرح می شود که مخالفت با تشدید تنش میان ایران و جمهوری آذربایجان، به معن…
هر تهدیدی، پیش از آنکه آزمونی برای توان نظامی باشد، آزمونی برای بلوغ راهبردی یک جنبش است. در همین چارچوب، سخنان اخیر مصطفی هجری دبیر کل حزب دموکرات کردستان درباره آغاز هرگونه اقدام نظامی از محور ارومیه، صرف نظر از امکان تحقق آن، بیش از آنکه یک خبر باشد، تلاشی برای اثرگذاری بر فضای روانی و محاسبات سیاسی است. در شرایطی که برخی گروه های مسلح کردی ادعاهایی درباره شهرهای تورک نشین مطرح می کنند، اهمیت چنین مواضعی بیش از آن…
امروز سومین سالگرد درگذشت نویسنده و اندیشمند شناخته شده آذربایجان علی شهبازی (خوجالی) است.
او با نوشته ها و تحلیل های خود سهمی موثر در تکوین و تداوم گفتمان فکری و فرهنگی این حوزه داشت.
نام و یاد او گرامی و آثارش ماندگار است
⏭ Metam
✅ @pishroaz
تاریخ این سرزمین بارها شاهد بوده که کسانی با توهم قبیلهای و پشتوانهی خشونت بیریشه، دست به تهدید و خونریزی زدهاند، اما همیشه همان تهدیدها، ننگ جاودانهای بر پیشانی شان گذاشته است.
اسماعیل سیمکو، که نامش در تاریخ با قتل عام مردم بیدفاع اورمیه گره خورده، نماد همان عقبماندگی و تعصب کور بود؛ و حالا نوادگان فکری او با تکرار همان ادبیات پوسیده، تنها نشان میدهند که از میراث ننگآور اجداد خود چیزی جز نفرت و جهل به ا…
ابتدای دهه ی هشتاد با معرفی یکی از دوستانم با دختری آشنا شدم...
آن دختر رفیق روزهای سختم ماند و همره و شریک زندگیم... سعی کردم ابتدای راه آن دختر را با راه ملی مان آشنا کنم و برای همین نیز سفری را آغاز کردیم برای شهرهای مختلف #آذربایجان ، در امتداد این سفر در مراسم #قلعه_بابک شرکت کردیم و بعد هم سفری داشتیم به پاریس ایران #اورمیه و دریاچه ی زیبای آن...
آن روزها نه ما چین و چروکی بر صورتمان بود و نه دریاچه غم مرگ بر…
آینده از آنِ کسانیست که ژرفتر میاندیشند، نه آنان که بلندتر فریاد میزنند.»
در روزگاری که آتش بیثباتی، منطقه را در بر گرفته و موج التهاب از هر سو میتازد، بیش از هر زمان دیگر نیازمند صدای عقلانیت، آیندهنگری و درک استراتژیک هستیم.
ما تورکها، تاریخی پرفراز و نشیب اما ریشهدار و سرافراز داریم. در بزنگاههای دشوار، آنچه ما را متمایز ساخته، نه شتابزدگی و هیاهو، بلکه عقل سیاسی و بلوغ جمعیمان بوده است.
در شرایطی ک…
این کودکان همان شمایید،همان ماییم، همان جان های پیشین…
در ۲۶ آذر ۱۳۲۵،
بازگشته در کالبدهایی نو.
روزی،روحی در دل تاریخ برای آگاهی جنگید؛ اکنون آن روح در دستان کوچک آنان ادامه دارد.
آن ها که امروز بر کتاب های بی محتوا اعتراض میکنند، وارثان حق طلبی اند،نه شورشگر.
تناسخ آگاهی این بار در مدرسه ای بی لبخند،با عزمی راسخ و صدایی رسا تر از همیشه از نو زاده شده.
سارای شهبازی
ایمضایا قوشولون⬇️⬇️
@az_imza
👍21❤1
Signed Ali Shahbazi
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @AZ_IMZA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,019,979 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@AZ_IMZA named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@az_imz named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“" ایمضا "” (@AZ_IMZA), 399 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AZ_IMZA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
