https://t.me/abo_auto Самый лучший , самый топовый ютубер из автоиндустрии. Интересный контент и прочее позволяет тебе погрузиться в мир автомобилей. Так же Або прислушивается к своим подписчикам, (он делал видос про мустанг, кобру и салин за это я ему безумно благодарен). Хочу вас попросить подписаться и поддерживать Або, так как он не давно начал вести каналы. Давайте пожелаем ему удачи в мире ют и тд

Channel
AUTO WERKS CPM
@AUTO_WERKS_CPM
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
47subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002893739373 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AUTO_WERKS_CPM |
| Description | Искусство на четырёх колёсах.Лучшие кадры самых стильных автомобилей. Подписывайся,если ценишь прекрасное. ООО"Тмыв денег" https://t.me/+4LICvgnah3FmZjFi чат https://t.me/boost/AUTO_WERKS_CPM бусти |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AUTO_WERKS_CPM |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 47 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 47 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 46 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 57.6%
- avg views ÷ 47 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 27.1
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 9.06%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (1 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 352 |
| Reactions total | 23 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 461
- Links
- 16
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
23 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5307717101178364338 | 11 | 47.8% | |
| custom 5237734255517277791 | 4 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5323434061551670966 | 3 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5348156219724962746 | 3 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5283105267829997242 | 2 | 8.70% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
BMW M3 E46🚘 Горная дорога. Тишина. Только ты и асфальт. 🏔️💨 Горный серпантин, плавные повороты и невероятный вид, который открывается на каждом километре. Здесь не место гонкам - здесь место наслаждению. BMW M3 E46 на горной трассе не спешит. Она просто едет, позволяя каждой детали раскрыться в полную силу. Прямо сейчас нет нужды доказывать что-то или срываться с места - есть только дорога, музыка и атмосфера. Её …
custom 53077171011783643382custom 52377342555172777911custom 52831052678299972421
Наш новый братишка https://t.me/JDMCarParking_77 , поддержите молодого
Пожалуйста, поддержите и наших братишек, у кого есть подписка на Premium если не сложно
Кому реально не сложно и готов поддержать канал дальше, дайте голосов на канал🥺🥺 https://t.me/boost/CPM_Shop_0
-1🥺
custom 53077171011783643381
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53234340615516709662custom 52377342555172777911custom 52831052678299972421
А прикол в том что каждый (а именно все 10 победителей) получат так: первая пятерка SRT8, другая пятерка RAM SRT10 Как-то так
custom 53077171011783643382custom 53234340615516709661custom 53481562197249627461
AUTO WERKS CPM pinned a photo
Вы просили - МЫ СДЕЛАЛИ Легендарный розыгрыш на 5 DODGE CHARGER SRT8 и 5 DODGE CHARGER SRT10 Условия для такого мега розыгрыша необходимо подписаться: 1. сюда 2. сюда 3. сюда 4. сюда весь розыгрыш будет идти 20 дней, успеют ВСЕ (и спасибо моему бро => LUMERIS_RP)
От нашего канала приз выдан ✅
custom 53077171011783643381
Результаты конкурса: 🥳 Победители: 1. 𓆩 BRAIN 𓆪 (@ugoIovnlk1) 2. balaklavikk (@ooo_gerg) 3. Энвер (@En_7Z) 4. Danilinho76 (@savinho76) 5. _AFERIST_ (@AFERIST00) Проверить результаты ✅
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @AUTO_WERKS_CPM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,147,120 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@abo_auto · 721 postBest Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]
@BestRandom_bot · 1,394,3941 postc͜͡a͜͡r͜͡ p͜͡a͜͡r͜͡k͜͡i͜͡n͜͡g͜͡ s͜͡h͜͡o͜͡p͜͡🚗🌀
@CPM_Shop_0 · 1521 post𝑮 𝑨 𝑴 𝑬 𝑹 _ 𝟑 𝟗 _ 𝑹 𝑼 𝑺 _ 𝑪 𝑷 𝑴
@gamer_39_rus_cpm · 2501 postJDM Уголок
@JDMCarParking_77 · 111 post亗 LUMERIS_RP 亗 Live
@LUMERIS_RP · 501 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AUTO WERKS CPM” (@AUTO_WERKS_CPM), 47 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AUTO_WERKS_CPM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.