Channel
@ATTACEspana
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
521subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001073078885 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ATTACEspana |
| Description | Información y convocatorias del activismo de ATTAC |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ATTACEspana |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 521 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:39 | 521 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 June 2026 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 887 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
33 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13 | 39.4% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 27.3% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 21.2% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 12.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📉 Elimina los umbrales de participación accionarial que controlaban las exenciones fiscales entre empresas 🔬 Amplía las exenciones a los gastos en I+D 📝 Sustituye los controles previos por la autodeclaración empresarial 💰 Costará 5.300 millones de euros al año solo por la exención del impuesto de retención 📊 El contraste: La UE pierde entre 210.000 y 250.000 millones de euros al año por elusión y evasión fiscal tran…
🤬2
🌍 La fuga de los tecnólogos libertarios: de Silicon Valley a los enclaves del Sur Los arquitectos de la vigilancia digital global están abandonando Estados Unidos en busca de territorios sin rendición de cuentas democrática. 🏝 Roatán (Honduras): la ciudad-estado Próspera reunió 120 millones de dólares... y demandó al país por 10.000 millones cuando este recuperó su soberanía legal. 🇦🇷 Argentina: Peter Thiel, cofunda…
👍1
🌍 ¿UN MUNDO RICO SIN CRECIMIENTO? El equipo de Thomas Piketty publica el Global Justice Report, y sus conclusiones desafían el sentido común económico dominante. 💰 60.000 €/año de renta para toda la población mundial, un objetivo que consideran viable ⏱️ Reducir la jornada laboral de 2.100 a 1.000 horas anuales para 2100 🥩 -25% en el consumo de carne a nivel global ⚖️ Financiado gravando a quienes más tienen, no con …
👍2
⚖️ El impuesto que aterroriza a los multimillonarios California quiere gravar, con un impuesto único de hasta el 5%, los patrimonios superiores a 1.000 millones de dólares. La propuesta ya puede entrar en la papeleta electoral de noviembre de 2026. 💰 ¿A dónde iría el dinero? 90% → sanidad 10% → educación y alimentación 📉 El truco de siempre El multimillonario típico apenas tiene "ingresos" fiscales: vive de plusval…
👏3
🇪🇺 ¿Seguridad para quién? Hemos firmado, junto a más de 50 organizaciones europeas, una carta abierta al Parlamento Europeo y a los gobiernos de la UE sobre el presupuesto 2028-2034. 📌 Lo que pedimos: 1. Rechazar los 131.000 millones de euros para defensa, seguridad y espacio. 2. Redirigir esos fondos a sanidad, vivienda, educación, cuidados y clima. 3. Proteger los fondos civiles de la UE frente a la apropiación m…
👏2❤1
⛏️ La minería metálica, motor oculto del caos geopolítico Litio, cobalto, níquel, tierras raras: los minerales que sostienen la economía verde, la digitalización y la industria militar se han convertido en el centro de la disputa global entre EEUU y China. ⚔️ Ante la pérdida de hegemonía económica frente a China, EEUU y sus aliados despliegan guerra arancelaria, proteccionismo, tratados de materias primas críticas y…
👏1
📉 El fin de la hiperglobalización y el resurgimiento del imperialismo. Publicamos un análisis en profundidad sobre el colapso del sistema comercial "basado en normas" y lo que viene después. 🏛️ La OMC, paralizada El Órgano de Apelación lleva bloqueado desde 2019. EEUU ha vetado nuevos nombramientos 91 veces. Mientras tanto, se normalizan los acuerdos plurilaterales sin mandato ni consenso. 🌍 El nuevo imperialismo …
❤2
¿Qué tipo de libertad protege la renta básica? Solemos debatirla en términos técnicos: cuánto cuesta, cómo se financia… pero la pregunta de fondo es otra: qué relaciones de poder transforma. Defendemos una libertad entendida no solo como ausencia de interferencia, sino como no-dominación: nadie es libre si depende de que un jefe, un casero, un acreedor o una autoridad “se porte bien” con él para poder vivir. Una r…
❤3👍1
Cuando el CEO de BlackRock dice que el viejo modelo de capitalismo global se está desmoronando, merece la pena prestar atención, aunque no por lo que parece. La historia reciente muestra un patrón: el capitalismo no suele colapsar, muta. Tras la Gran Depresión aceptó más intervención estatal. Tras los años setenta, se giró contra los trabajadores con el neoliberalismo. Tras 2008, rescató a la banca e infló los preci…
📡 Newsletter ATTAC | Junio 2026 Cerramos el curso con una reflexión incómoda y varios frentes abiertos. Os contamos. ✍️ Alzad la mirada La visita papal paralizó Madrid mientras se aplaudía un discurso ambiguo que condena la guerra y el racismo pero esquiva nombrar la causa: el capitalismo, la explotación, la injusticia. Y para quien no cree, el sistema ofrece sucedáneos igual de contemplativos pero más vistosos, c…
👍2
https://espacio-publico.com/la-gran-fuga-de-los-tecnologos-libertarios-de-silicon-valley-a-los-enclaves-del-sur
¿Quién decide cómo se gestiona la educación pública en Madrid, y con qué modelo? Recomendamos este debate Más Madrid, PSOE, IU-Madrid y Podemos responden a las preguntas planteadas por tres personas cualificadas en las etapas de Infantil, Reglada y Universitaria. Un material que aporta argumentos y contexto en un momento en que se habla de huelga general educativa en la Comunidad de Madrid. Frente a la deriva priva…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ATTACEspana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 254,695 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ATTAC España” (@ATTACEspana), 521 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ATTACEspana.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.