Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

زاپاس اعتراف

@ATERAFBADt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

60subscribers

-140,145 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001133342378
TypeChannel
Username@ATERAFBADt
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ATERAFBADt

Growth

60140,20570,132.56 August 2026 — 140,205 subscribers7 August 2026 — 140,026 subscribers8 August 2026 — 139,814 subscribers8 August 2026 — 60 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -140,145. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 23:0260-139,754
8 Aug 2026, 01:50139,814-212
7 Aug 2026, 05:00140,026-179
6 Aug 2026, 06:35140,205first reading

Engagement

54 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9435.8%
avg views ÷ 60 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,660
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 54 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 53 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held54 (4 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total300,060
Reactions total1,967
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

990 reactions across 21 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣37838.2%
😐19219.4%
💔18418.6%
👍12312.4%
727.27%
😁242.42%
👏60.606%
😱60.606%
🤷‍♀20.202%
🤷‍♂20.202%
😢10.101%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,967reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC≈1,270 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/ATERAFBADt/71681 پدرام اینم بزار اعتراف زرده منم یه زمانی دنبال رویاهام بودم با هرکسی سکس نمی‌کردم تا همون دختر کیر زد بهم فهمیدم الکی کصا رو پروندم دختر رویاهام نریده برام🤣 یه سری ها هم گفتن تو ارزونی تو بی ارزشی نمی‌دونم خرابی ببین سکس کردن با پارتنرت یه چیز عادیه عرضه‌اشو دارم مخ میزنم پارتنرمم خودش بهم میده نه خیانت کردم بهش نه زوری درکار بوده حالا اون موقعی که تو خیابون یه سری هارو میبینی میگی ا

😐15🤣43

8 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC≈4,160 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

¹⁷'⁵'¹⁴⁰⁵ ✅انجام انواع طلسم ودعا باموکل رحمانی با نتیجه گیری فوری توسط استاد علوم غریبه با بیش از ۳۰سال تجربه تضمینی باضمانت برگشت هزینه💰👇 👫‌‌بازگشت معشوق ۲۴ ساعته ☠‌‌ دفع سحر،جادو ،طلسم 24 ساعته 🏡 فروش ملک و زمین 24ساعته 👩‍❤️‍👨بخت گشایی قوی،خواستگار فوری 🪢پوچ کردن رقیب عشقی و محبت ✈️ ارسال فوری بصورت کاملا محرمانه 👇👇👇 @baghebeheshtiyan📣 📞 ارتباط مستقیم رایگان با استاد نیازی آیدی: @molla_niyazi شماره تماس: 090096

🤣2

8 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC≈2,450 views57 reactionsread 8 August 2026

سلام ، یچیزی میگم خواهشا مسخره و قضاوت نکنید ، کسی اینجا هست بخاطر نسبت فامیلی پدر و مادرش حس بی ارزشی و شرم داشته باشه؟ من دخترم ولی بخاطر اینکه مامان بابام، دخترخاله پسرخالن خیلی حس بی ارزشی شدید دارم جوری که حاضرم خودمو بک،شم ، بنظرتون پسرا براشون مهمه این نسبت فامیلی که دختررو مسخره کنن و بگن برو بابا ؟ Pedram" چه به خاطر چیزاییی مزخرف میخاید خود کشی کنید 😂😂😂 فامیل بودن جریمه مگه 😒

😐49👏4😁2😢1😱1

8 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC≈2,510 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026

سلام شکلات فندقیه من(پدرام) کومککک دخترم بعضی موقع ها لبه کصم اینقد درد میکنه ک نمیدونم چکار کنم دلم میخاد دست بزنم بهش ولی میترسم پرده ی نازنینم پاره شه چکار کنم اخه منه بدبخت اینقد درد میکنه ک نمیتونم از درد کص بخوابم جقم نمیزنم خیلی کم یبار شیو کردم با پودر مو بر یهو زدمش ب کصم از حموم دراومدم ی درد شدیدی گرفتم ک نگو @HarfBeManBot Pedram " نمردیم شکلات فندقی هم شدیم چرا باید درد بکنه اونجات آخه 😂😂😂

🤣17😁17😐5

8 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC≈4,890 viewsread 8 August 2026

🔵🔴 چلسی یا میلان بنظرت ؟ بیا وین اسپورت ببینم چیکار میکنی! 💰👇✅ https://telegram.me/joinchat/AAAAAEgBTn0UL_Kmkpy4Cw

8 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC≈4,510 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇮🇹 آدرنالین روی اوج! هیجان نبرد داغ چلسی و میلان را از دست نده! ⚽️🔥 ​امشب دو غول بزرگ فوتبال اروپا روبروی هم قرار می‌گیرند. نبردی سخت، نفس‌گیر و پر از لحظات پیش‌بینی‌نشده! آیا آبی‌های لندن پیروز میدان می‌شوند یا روسونری هیجان را به اوج می‌رساند؟ 🎁 #شارژ هدیه بدون قید و شرط ۵٪ 🎁 #بونوس تقویت ضرایب ورزشی تا ۵۰٪ 🎁 کش بک (برگشت پول) ۳تا ۳۵٪ 🎁 ریک بک های هفتگی پوکر تا ۲۰٪ ♟️ بازی کن، ببَر، #پادشاه شو! 👇

7 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC≈7,910 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🃏 فقط کارت نکش… بازی رو کنترل کن! در بلک‌جک آنلاین UndoBet روبه‌روی دیلرهای زنده فارسی زبان بازی کن، تصمیم درست بگیر و برای رسیدن به ۲۱ رقابت کن. ♦️♠️ ❤️‍🔥 میزهای زنده و حرفه‌ای ⚡️ واریز و برداشت سریع 🎧 پشتیبانی فارسی ۲۴ ساعته 🔒 محیط امن و قابل‌اعتماد ✅ کریپتوپاور اینجاست تا کاربران حرفه ای تفاوت را احساس کنند! با هر واریز با ارز های دیجیتال در اوندوبت ده درصد بونوس بدون محدودیت دریافت کنیدتا مسیر پیروزی هموار تر

7 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC≈9,500 viewsread 8 August 2026

💥 فقط کارت نکش… پول در بیار 👇 https://t.me/+RLAjZit9CsxmMGM8 بهترین افنجار ایران 🔥👆

7 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC≈1,350 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

گپ خودمونه بیاید کسشعر بگیم 😈💦 https://t.me/quizZbjskk

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @ATERAFBADt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 142,212 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

fido08bazi20.click2 posts · 5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026 · example post
winspo7080.com2 posts · 5 August 2026 – 6 August 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“زاپاس اعتراف” (@ATERAFBADt), 60 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ATERAFBADt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.