Channel
@eterafk0n
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
76,831subscribers
-794 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001496399351 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eterafk0n |
| Description | تبلیغات @tadligat78 < اعتراف 🔞 دختر پسرای حشری 🔞 > میتونی از اینجا اعتراف کنی👇 https://t.me/HarfBeManBOT?start=HBM12711948 |
| Created | Between 1 May 2019 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eterafk0n |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 76,831 | -117 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 76,948 | -151 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:41 | 77,099 | -124 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 77,223 | -113 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 77,336 | -131 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 77,467 | -143 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 77,610 | -15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 77,625 | first reading |
107 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 66 of 106 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 107 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 117,045 |
| Reactions total | 933 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
933 reactions across 60 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 502 | 53.8% | |
| ❤ | 143 | 15.3% | |
| 👍 | 114 | 12.2% | |
| 💔 | 34 | 3.64% | |
| 💩 | 32 | 3.43% | |
| 👎 | 27 | 2.89% | |
| 🤮 | 21 | 2.25% | |
| 🖕 | 19 | 2.04% | |
| 🙏 | 16 | 1.71% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 0.965% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 0.857% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.322% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.322% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.214% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 107 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 933reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#پیام_ناشناس سلام من دوست پسرم چند روزه رفته پیش رفیقش رفتارش اصلا عین قبل نیست قبلاپیگیر بود مثلا اگر شب میشود میومد بهم پیام مبدا و .. ولی الان اینطور نیست منم داره خیلی بدم میاد چون درحد کوتاه میاد پیام میده قبلا کوتاه پیام نمیدادم ... و کلا یه جوری شده رابطه مون منم دونبال اینم که بهم بزنمش شما جا من بودین چیکار میکردین ؟ @HarfBeManBot Pedram" مطمئنی رفیقش پسره 😐
🤣6❤2💔1
اکثر رباتها اول ازت پول میخوان… ما میگیم اول تست کن! 👇 🎁 ماینر رایگان 1,000,000 تومانی بگیر 📈 درآمدت رو مشاهده کن 💸 برداشت رو ثبت کن 🔍 بعد خودت درباره ادامه کار تصمیم بگیر فعالسازی برای کاربران جدید:👇 🤖 @Chanellminingbot
❤1
#پیام_ناشناس سلام بچها خوبید من حتی خجالت میکشم تو ناشناس اینو بگم حتی داره گریم میاد ولی من پدرم معتاده و نمیدونم چطوری بهش بگم بس کنه. میدونید، ی جورایی خجالت میکشم بهش بگم نمیدونم چرا. شایدم میترسم رابطمون بد شه. ولی خسته شدم جدی. هرچقدر دعا میکنم جواب نمیده.من دهمم امسال میرم یازدهم. ی بار بهش گفتم ولی تا گفتم جوش اورد. انگار تعجب کرده بود من همچین چیزی گفتم یا فکر میکرد من بلد نیستم چیزی بگم میدونید. ولی اره…
💔16
²¹'⁵'¹⁴⁰⁵ 🔑حل مشکلات:گشایش بخت و کار،بازگشت معشوق، باطلسحر، درمان نازایی،فروش فوری ملک، بیماریهای لاعلاج،جن زدگی و همزاد و،،،،، 🔥تضمینی🔥 📜باانرژی ایات، حروف ابجد ، سنگها و موکلهای رحمانی🧞♂ کلیه محصولات از قبیل خرمهره🐍, مهره مار,🐍 و.......باضمانت کتبی برگشت هزینه مژده مژده مژده 🧏♂مشاوره رایگان🧏♂ ارسال به تمام نقاط کشور و خارج کشور✈️ 📨جهت سفارش و اطلاعات بیشتر با استاد سی…
#پیام_ناشناس سلام من دخترم 18سالمه خب از یه موقعی متوجه شدم به درد علاقه دارم برا خودمم عجیب بود مثلا وقتایی ک یه جاییم اتفاقی زخم میشد از بدنم به جای این ک دردم بگیره بدم بیاد از اون درد لذت میبردم یا فشارش میدادم بیشتر بسوزه درد بگیره چند وقت بعد با یه پسری اشنا شدم ک به اون گفتم قضیه رو اونم بم گف بیا امتحان کن من میام میزنمت چند جات زخم میکنم ببین دوس داری یا نه قرار بود فقط یکم بزنتم دردم بگیره ببینم چطوریه منم …
🤮11👍2❤1💔1
📲 اپلیکیشن اندروید سایت ریتزوبت 🔥 🚀 وقتی شرط هاتون رو توی ریتزوبت ثبت کنین ، علاوه بر ضرایب بالا ، هفتگی با کد های هدیه کسب درآمد میکنید 🤑 ♦️ آموزش شارژ حساب با کریپتو ♦️ آموزش شارژ حساب ریالی در ریتزوبت
⚡️ شارژ حساب از طریق ارز دیجیتال در ریتزوبت و در این پلتفرم بین المللی و جهانی پیش بینیکنید📱⚽️ 🇫🇷 #پاریس 🆚🏴 #استون_ویلا ❓ بازی های حساس اروپایی در ریتزو بت پیشبینی کنید ⚡️ 1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣ ⚡️فرآیند ثبت نام ساده و آسان ⚡️ آپشن های متنوع با ضریب بالا ⚡️ امکان شارژ حساب با کارت بانکی ⚡️ شرطبندی بدون لیمیت روزانه ♠️ کازینو آنلاین شبانه روزی ⚡️ پشتیبانی از 61 زبان 🎰بونوس 100% اولین واریز ⚽️بونوس…
#پیام_ناشناس سلام پسرم ی سوال از دخترا داشتم برای شما قد یک پسر جذابتره یا فیس @HarfBeManBot Pedram" دخترا لاشی پسندن گزینه سه😂😂
👍11👎9🤣2
#پیام_ناشناس سلام من دخترم ی چندین ماه پیش خیلییی افسردگی داشتم کل روز خونه بودم را کسی حرف نمیزدم و مشکل قبلی داشتم تصمیم گرفتم با یکی دوست شم از تلگرام باهم آشنا شدیم قرار گذاشتیم باهام اولش خجالت کشیدم خیلیییی ب بهانه فیلم دیدن رو تخت رفتیم و اون برام خورد خیلییی لذت بخش بود خیلییی در حدی ک ب طرف وابسته شدم دلم میخواست اون رو همش ولی پسره میخاصت منم بخورم براش ولی بلد نبودم و انکار میکردم بعد ی بار دیگ خونع گرفت …
🤣25👍5❤4😱2😍1
📲 اپلیکیشن اندروید سایت ریتزوبت 🔥 🚀 وقتی شرط هاتون رو توی ریتزوبت ثبت کنین ، علاوه بر ضرایب بالا ، هفتگی با کد های هدیه کسب درآمد میکنید 🤑 ♦️ آموزش شارژ حساب با کریپتو ♦️ آموزش شارژ حساب ریالی در ریتزوبت
😍1
⚡️ شارژ حساب از طریق ارز دیجیتال در ریتزوبت و در این پلتفرم بین المللی و جهانی پیش بینیکنید📱⚽️ 🇫🇷 #پاریس 🆚🏴 #استون_ویلا ❓ بازی های حساس اروپایی در ریتزو بت پیشبینی کنید ⚡️ 1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣ ⚡️فرآیند ثبت نام ساده و آسان ⚡️ آپشن های متنوع با ضریب بالا ⚡️ امکان شارژ حساب با کارت بانکی ⚡️ شرطبندی بدون لیمیت روزانه ♠️ کازینو آنلاین شبانه روزی ⚡️ پشتیبانی از 61 زبان 🎰بونوس 100% اولین واریز ⚽️بونوس…
😍1
📲 اپلیکیشن اندروید سایت ریتزوبت 🔥 🚀 وقتی شرط هاتون رو توی ریتزوبت ثبت کنین ، علاوه بر ضرایب بالا ، هفتگی با کد های هدیه کسب درآمد میکنید 🤑 ♦️ آموزش شارژ حساب با کریپتو ♦️ آموزش شارژ حساب ریالی در ریتزوبت
😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @eterafk0n. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 854,791 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اعتراف کن!” (@eterafk0n), 76,831 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eterafk0n.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.