Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

AS (Análisis Técnico y fundamental) Objetivo 2025

@AScriptomonedas

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

168subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001207992061
TypeChannel
Username@AScriptomonedas
DescriptionCanal dónde comparto mis trades y opiniones. (No son consejos de inversión).
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/AScriptomonedas

Growth

1687 August 2026 — 168 subscribers8 August 2026 — 168 subscribers7 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 167–169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:30168no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:45168first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
616
Videos
5
Links
359

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍975.0%
🎉18.33%
👌18.33%
🤔18.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2025 to 5 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Nov 2025, 14:56 UTC387 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

El precio está entrando en sobreventa, lo cuál podría hacernos ver una reversión del precio a corto plazo. En largo plazo podría estar formando un patrón hch (hombro cabeza hombro) pero para ello el precio debería rebotar en breve y no superar máximos. Una vez formado el patrón y roto el cuello del mismo (83k) iríamos a visitar los 36k. Pero todo eso llevaría su tiempo.

👍3

Signed CryptoFomo

11 Oct 2025, 19:55 UTC415 viewsread 8 August 2026

El patrón quedó invalidado, pero no me equivoqué en que pintaba mal la cosa. Para mí el ciclo acaba este mes pero puedo estar equivocado..

Signed CryptoFomo

10 Oct 2025, 22:08 UTC361 viewsread 8 August 2026

Dólar en zona de soporte y potencial subida,malo para Btc

Signed CryptoFomo

10 Oct 2025, 22:07 UTC344 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍1

Signed CryptoFomo

10 Oct 2025, 22:04 UTC314 viewsread 8 August 2026

Si se da ese patrón, Nio debería bajar por debajo de los 4$ para luego irse a los 12$

Signed CryptoFomo

25 Sept 2025, 18:28 UTC398 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

De confirmarse el primer patrón de hch con objetivo en 88k daría lugar a finalizar otro patrón hch más grande. Después de alcanzar los 88k el precio subiría a una cifra cercana a los 110k para luego volver a caer y confirmar dicho patrón llevando el precio por debajo de los 50k. Si el precio hiciera nuevos máximos (125k) anularía este patrón. Me mosquea mucho que todo el mundo hable de que el ciclo ha cambiado, que h

👍3👌1🤔1

Signed CryptoFomo

25 Sept 2025, 18:14 UTC235 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Si fuera verdad que hemos visto el top podríamos ver una corrección que llevaría el precio cerca de los 40k para Agosto de 2026.

👍1

Signed CryptoFomo

25 Sept 2025, 17:58 UTC199 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Pues en Mayo daba como objetivo mínimo los 128k, y hemos visto los 124k ,creo que por tiempo ese ha sido el top de este ciclo. En diario veo un hch con objetivo en 88k. Una pena que este ciclo haya sido el peor de todos, pero los jugadores han cambiado, se han centrado en Btc y eso junto a la gran cantidad de alts parece que ha lastrado la altseason.

🎉1👍1

Signed CryptoFomo

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AScriptomonedas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AS (Análisis Técnico y fundamental) Objetivo 2025” (@AScriptomonedas), 168 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AScriptomonedas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.