Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CÜM-shoŧovşkı3 愛

Channel

CÜM-shoŧovşkı3 愛

@ASShot_CUMsh0ot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

185subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002805553821
TypeChannel
Username@ASShot_CUMsh0ot
DescriptionThank you sm @clionsSTUD01 !
Created17 June 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ASShot_CUMsh0ot

Growth

1857 Aug 2026, 16:31 — 185 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 12:17 — 185 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:318 Aug 2026, 12:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 184–186 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 12:17185no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:31185first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 17 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

276 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53506665207352756096523.6%
custom 53007619385133911524415.9%
custom 52404931707095194294215.2%
custom 53009160548248727962910.5%
custom 5384495727562989608227.97%
custom 5404811760391691751196.88%
custom 5456424605726043258196.88%
custom 5431428531718473352186.52%
custom 5440543225414720935186.52%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 276reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2025 to 3 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 14 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ASShot_CUMsh0ot. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2025 to 3 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Jan 2026, 18:46 UTC655 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ребят а мы будем открывать эту залупу?

31 Dec 2025, 19:22 UTC668 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

С новым годом, камшотики🤍🤍

custom 53506665207352756092

13 Sept 2025, 15:37 UTC≈4,120 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ㅤCÜM-shoŧovşkı3 愛 нуждается в ответственной администрации ✍ Мы нуждаемся в : Админ по союзам 1/2 ( желательно с опытом, если нет - ничего страшного, научим ) Админ по нью 2/3 😘 Нам нужны ответственные администраторы Писать: мне

custom 53506665207352756093custom 53009160548248727961custom 54564246057260432581

22 Aug 2025, 08:19 UTC≈4,050 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Не забываем ставить иниц в ник/био/инфо

custom 53506665207352756093custom 53007619385133911522

22 Aug 2025, 08:06 UTC≈3,570 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ㅤㅤㅤ Posts for repost ❤️ Meow Meow Meow

custom 53506665207352756093custom 54314285317184733522

10 Aug 2025, 20:54 UTC≈5,240 views62 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
File

ㅤ We are always ready to form a ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤ union with you ! 🤩 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ㅤНаши следящие: @VnatyreNishimura ㅤㅤ Заключаем союзы от 20+ ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ1:1 — 6:6 Waiting for you 🤩

custom 524049317070951942918custom 530091605482487279612custom 535066652073527560912custom 53007619385133911524custom 54048117603916917514custom 53844957275629896083custom 54314285317184733523custom 54405432254147209353

10 Aug 2025, 20:43 UTC≈4,890 views108 reactions13 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 530076193851339115224custom 524049317070951942918custom 535066652073527560915custom 530091605482487279610custom 54048117603916917519custom 53844957275629896088custom 54314285317184733528custom 54405432254147209358

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ASShot_CUMsh0ot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 93,591 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CÜM-shoŧovşkı3 愛” (@ASShot_CUMsh0ot), 185 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ASShot_CUMsh0ot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.