kira kira para admin dan member kabarnya sekarang gimana ya๐ค๐ค

Channel
๐๐ ๐. ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ป๐ฎ
@ARSTERSOFC
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
193subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001168359206 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ARSTERSOFC |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ARSTERSOFC |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 193 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 194 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 194 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 November 2022 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Gamon sm arsters gak sih
kangen berat
Hai, kmu siapa?
hai
Kangen yah sm arsiters
gercep banget
ini siapa
Hi, kangen yah
hi, kangen
hai
siapa kangen arsitek
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ARSTERSOFC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
minggu mute/unmute
- mute28%
- unmute72%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2022 to 2 December 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank โ 784,678 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@OFCTOPKINGDOM ยท 293 postsDIARY TEAMPRO
@ARTHOPRODUCE ยท 1182 postsOFC ๐ณ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ [ VAKUM ]
@HIGWAYMANOFC ยท 161 post๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ป๐ฎ
@mppsarst ยท 61 postMPPS JAEROSร WORLD.
@mppsjrw ยท 321 post๐นโฅ๐งโโ๐ Dick Partner ๐ธเผข
@MYPARTNERSHIP ยท 61 postNRMM PARTNERSHIP
@NRMMPARTNER ยท 21 postARSIP LรฮNJING_GฮNKโ๐ฒ๐ช
@ofcmppsloanjing ยท 2621 postPARTNERSHIP BUJANG
@PSBUJANGNCT ยท 11 postbestie kajen
@pskajenvillage ยท 11 postWattana Partnership
@wattanapartner ยท 71 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐ ๐. ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ป๐ฎโ (@ARSTERSOFC), 193 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ARSTERSOFC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.