Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آقُتٌبًآسِـآتٌ مًوٌجّعٌةّ، حًـبً عٌتٌـآبً.

Channel

آقُتٌبًآسِـآتٌ مًوٌجّعٌةّ، حًـبً عٌتٌـآبً.

@AQSZEM

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

566subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001271208556
TypeChannel
Username@AQSZEM
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AQSZEM

Growth

56656856710 August 2026 — 568 subscribers11 August 2026 — 568 subscribers18 August 2026 — 566 subscribers10 August 202618 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 566–568 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 13:13566-2
11 Aug 2026, 00:52568no change
10 Aug 2026, 20:46568first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 September 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2758.7%
👍1532.6%
😢36.52%
🔥12.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2022 to 1 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jan 2023, 13:01 UTC≈1,960 viewsread 10 August 2026

ڪل عام ونتو بخير​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​❤️.

12 Sept 2022, 14:28 UTC≈2,560 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

على سبيل الاكتفاء لا يهمنا من يأتي ولا يهمنا من يغادر..!!

👍5😢3

12 Sept 2022, 14:28 UTC≈2,570 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

قد يبتسم لك احدهم خبثاً. وقد يصرخ بوجهك احدهم حباً الأمور لا تؤخذ بظاهرها دائماً، فالبعض عكس ما تظن..!!

5

12 Sept 2022, 14:28 UTC≈2,640 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

‏"نحن الذين لا نملكُ من الأمر شيئاً إلا الدُّعاء فيا الله لا ترُدَّنا خائبين ..!!❤️

11

11 Sept 2022, 23:20 UTC≈2,530 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

الصلاة حياة فمن ضيعها أصبح ميتاً على قيد الحياة

10 Sept 2022, 17:57 UTC≈2,440 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Rjjll1

بعيدا عن فلسفات علم النفس و نصائح الاطباء و خرافات الموسيقى و الأغاني و الكتب.... لا أحد سيتذوق طعم الحياة و هوا لا يصلي .. ✅🇮🇹⚡ #مساء_الخير مـْــْمـْـْلُـِـِكُـُة آلُــِِرجـآلُـِـِِــ❗️

6👍2🔥1

9 Sept 2022, 19:35 UTC≈2,320 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

‏نحن الذين ندّعي بأننا بأفضل أيامنا و نُواسي كل من يشكو ضجر الأيام، من يصدق بأننا متهشمون من الداخل،و بأننا نصادق الليل و السقف، حتى لم نعُد نعرف متى آخر مرة استيقظنا ولم نضع أيدينا فوق قلوبنا خوفًا من الإنهيار !!

9 Sept 2022, 13:32 UTC≈2,210 viewsread 10 August 2026

اسأل الله لكم : راحة تملأ نفوسكم .. ورضا يغمر قلوبكم .. وعملا يرضي ربكم .. وذكرآ يشغل وقتكم .. وعفوآ يغسل ذنبكم .. وفرحآ يمحو همكم .. ورزقآ يزيدك طاعتكم .. وصفاء يعلو وجوهكم .. ويومآ يمحو ذنبي وذنبكم .. جمعه مباركة

9 Sept 2022, 13:09 UTC≈2,120 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

‏يَا باسِطًا كَف العطايَا بِالدُجى إذْ جنّ ليلُ المُقترِين وأدلجَا هَب مِن لدُنك على الفُؤادِ سكِينةً واجعل لنَا مِنْ كُل ضِيقٍ مخرجَا #جمعتكم_مباركـه

👍1

9 Sept 2022, 00:08 UTC≈2,020 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

﴿ قُمِ اللَّيْلَ إِلَّا قَلِيلًا ﴾ ‏ركـعَة يركعها العَـبْد في جُوف اللَيل، خَيْرٌ لَهُ مِنَ الدُّنْيَا وَمَا فِيهَا.

👍2

8 Sept 2022, 21:40 UTC≈1,870 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

الإستغفـار لا يصنـعُ الأمل فقط ، بل يرمم أحلامنـا ، ويفتح أبواب السمـاء برزقٍ لا ينتهي.. "وَبِالْأَسْحَارِ هُمْ يَسْتَغْفِرُونَ "

8 Sept 2022, 20:11 UTC≈1,850 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

يُعجبني إستثنائي لِنفسي ومدى إتساع صدري لمزاجيتي أحب كوني الملجأ الوحيد لتقلباتي..!!

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AQSZEM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 651,568 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آقُتٌبًآسِـآتٌ مًوٌجّعٌةّ، حًـبً عٌتٌـآبً.” (@AQSZEM), 566 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AQSZEM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.