Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

APS Channel 氣功治療

@APSMAGIC02

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

198subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001434619643
TypeChannel
Username@APSMAGIC02
Created26 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/APSMAGIC02

Growth

197198197.56 August 2026 — 197 subscribers7 August 2026 — 197 subscribers14 August 2026 — 198 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 197–198 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:37198+1
7 Aug 2026, 04:33197no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:32197first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

30 Mar 2026, 03:37 UTC18 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @APSMAGIC

【 平行時空】司長:你係嚟救人,定係嚟玩人? 司長: 我哋係班災民。首先,多謝你哋安排我哋返去執嘢。但係,睇完你哋嗰套所謂「安排」,我真係想問一句:你哋班官,究竟有無落地睇過吓? 隨信附上 500 幾個街坊嘅簽名,我哋唔係要求特權,我哋係要求做返個人。 第一,你當我哋係超人,定係當我哋係死人? 幾十層樓,升降機又無,你叫個阿婆執完嘢,一次過搬晒啲雜物落樓?你試吓自己行三十層樓梯,仲要拎住兩大袋嘢,睇吓你條氣順唔順?你話為咗「安全」,我就話你呢種「同進同出」嘅規矩係搵街坊條命嚟搏!喺黑麻麻、又窄又爛嘅樓梯負重,跌死人邊個負責?准街坊喺嗰三粒鐘入面分批搬落樓,係常識,唔係恩賜! 第二,三粒鐘「計死數」,簡直係荒謬絕倫! 你話「4個人入去3粒鐘,等於12個鐘工時」。司長,呢啲叫辦公室廢話!屋企燒到變咗廢墟,啲地契、金飾、相簿埋晒喺灰入面,你要人好似「超市搶購」咁三粒鐘執完?人哋係返去執返個家,唔係去貨倉攞貨呀!呢種計算法,完全係對受難

30 Mar 2026, 03:37 UTC14 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @APSMAGIC

【 平行時空】司長:你係嚟救人,定係嚟玩人? 司長: 我哋係班災民。首先,多謝你哋安排我哋返去執嘢。但係,睇完你哋嗰套所謂「安排」,我真係想問一句:你哋班官,究竟有無落地睇過吓? 隨信附上 500 幾個街坊嘅簽名,我哋唔係要求特權,我哋係要求做返個人。 第一,你當我哋係超人,定係當我哋係死人? 幾十層樓,升降機又無,你叫個阿婆執完嘢,一次過搬晒啲雜物落樓?你試吓自己行三十層樓梯,仲要拎住兩大袋嘢,睇吓你條氣順唔順?你話為咗「安全」,我就話你呢種「同進同出」嘅規矩係搵街坊條命嚟搏!喺黑麻麻、又窄又爛嘅樓梯負重,跌死人邊個負責?准街坊喺嗰三粒鐘入面分批搬落樓,係常識,唔係恩賜! 第二,三粒鐘「計死數」,簡直係荒謬絕倫! 你話「4個人入去3粒鐘,等於12個鐘工時」。司長,呢啲叫辦公室廢話!屋企燒到變咗廢墟,啲地契、金飾、相簿埋晒喺灰入面,你要人好似「超市搶購」咁三粒鐘執完?人哋係返去執返個家,唔係去貨倉攞貨呀!呢種計算法,完全係對受難

9 Feb 2026, 12:32 UTC39 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @thepointsglobalPhoto

【黎智英串謀勾結外國勢力 判囚 20 年】 《壹傳媒》創辦人黎智英與《蘋果日報》 3 間相關公司,去年 12 月被裁定串謀勾結外國勢力及串謀發布煽動刊物罪成。案件於周一(9日)早上10 時在西九龍裁判法院判刑,黎智英被判監 20 年。其餘早前承認或被裁定串謀勾結外國勢力罪的被告中,陳梓華被判監 6 年 3 個月,李宇軒判監 7 年 3 個月,張劍虹判監 6 年 9 個月,陳沛敏判監 7 年,楊清奇判監 7 年 3 個月,而羅偉光、林文宗及馮偉光則各判監 10 年。 開庭前已有逾 100 人輪候入庭旁聽,部分是通宵等候。 多名警方國家安全處的核心主管到庭旁聽,包括警務處副處長簡啟恩、國安處處長江學禮、助理處長王忠巡、總警司李桂華等。 黎智英太太李韻琴、《蘋果日報》前副社長陳沛敏丈夫、《立場新聞》前總編輯鍾沛權、以及天主教香港教區榮休主教陳日君亦有到庭。 多名外國領事或代表到庭旁聽,包括美國駐港澳副總領事施大偉。 現年

26 Feb 2025, 23:47 UTC271 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @APSMAGIC

【突發】台灣數名來自香港、參與「香港議會」選舉的候選人,被台灣當局下令限期離境!這世界真的如習近平智囊翟東昇說的:「天下沒有美元搞不定的事情!」?

25 Feb 2025, 23:02 UTC252 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @APSMAGIC

很喜歡村上春樹說的這段話: " 我動了離開你的念頭,不是因為你不好,也不是因為不愛了,只是你對我的態度,讓我覺得你的世界並不缺我,其實我可以厚著臉皮在糾纏你,但沒有任何意義。 因為和你在一起時,我的狀態不好,會激發我的脆弱焦躁善妒不安,會不斷吸引出我人格里最不好的一面,與其和你在一起互相消耗,不如就算了吧。 內心期待的東西一點一點在落空,慢慢就不想要了,重復的話也不想說了,對不起的事多了也無所謂了,當我發現你一點都不理解我的委屈時,我一句話都不想說了,百般委屈湧上心頭,話到嘴邊不值一提,不會拆穿你,但是會遠離會不動聲色,淘汰你,我只做選擇,從不教育。 你有你的立場,我有我的底線,迷失自我去愛別人挺沒意思的。慢熱,重感情不愛解釋總是心軟,吃了很多虧還是會相信別人,我也永遠沒長記性,但是我選擇離開。 我不想糾結在沒有意義的事情上了,伸手要的糖和你主動給的是兩個味道,這份關係還要不要繼續,反復問自己,其實我一點也不後悔遇見你,但是我們

28 Dec 2024, 13:01 UTC254 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @APSMAGIC

一直在家追梗十幾個直播台。所以整件事情都知道,由中環早上打到六點半左右,林卓延助理的直播便沒有任何聲音發出。只是在直播大約成半個鐘以上。與在中環的緊張狀況很不同,一邊直播一邊敍事方式口述在現場的訊息。林卓延本人一直都係和理非的中堅分子,保護市民和警察雙方作出多餘的暴力。每個直播都有過萬的觀察比比皆是。現在連被勇武派閙得最的竟然成為暴動者。這不是冤獄嗎? 這一定要記錄下來!

20 Dec 2024, 16:58 UTC208 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @APSMAGICPhoto

明天元朗721事件,懇請大家撐埋暫時最後一次現場直播,感激感激。 https://www.facebook.com/share/1AmgKzBwGr/

20 Dec 2024, 05:09 UTC164 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @APSMAGICPoll

你信唔信 消息 新世界 新年前破產 #美麗新香港

  1. 33%
  2. 唔信18%
  3. 仲有大把公司會破產24%
  4. 明年會更好3%
  5. 仆街多兩三年就會有好轉3%
  6. 一年仆街過一年, 起碼五年15%
  7. 大灣區會好0%
  8. 大灣區都係會仆街9%
  9. 移咗民都係仆街3%
  10. 習大大千秋萬代21%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Dec 2024, 09:50 UTC158 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @APSMAGICPoll

能夠做出指鹿為馬,你認為他收了多少錢

  1. 十萬以上18%
  2. 一百萬以上9%
  3. 一千萬以上5%
  4. 一億以上9%
  5. 得到其他利益32%
  6. 並不是為了什麼利益9%
  7. 冇收過錢5%
  8. 只是他個人能力0%
  9. 只是他的個人偏見14%
  10. 估不到9%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Dec 2024, 09:21 UTC136 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @StandwithUSwithwaterPoll

721事件那天你在哪裏

  1. 已返到屋企50%
  2. 返屋企途中5%
  3. 在港島5%
  4. 在九龍5%
  5. 在新界(並非元朗)10%
  6. 在元朗( 不再現場)0%
  7. 在元朗港鐵站附近10%
  8. 不在香港5%
  9. 在元朗(白衣人)5%
  10. 不想回憶10%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @APSMAGIC02. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Dec 2024, 05:09 UTCAnonymous Poll33 voters

你信唔信 消息 新世界 新年前破產 #美麗新香港

  1. 33%
  2. 唔信18%
  3. 仲有大把公司會破產24%
  4. 明年會更好3%
  5. 仆街多兩三年就會有好轉3%
  6. 一年仆街過一年, 起碼五年15%
  7. 大灣區會好0%
  8. 大灣區都係會仆街9%
  9. 移咗民都係仆街3%
  10. 習大大千秋萬代21%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Dec 2024, 09:50 UTCAnonymous Poll22 voters

能夠做出指鹿為馬,你認為他收了多少錢

  1. 十萬以上18%
  2. 一百萬以上9%
  3. 一千萬以上5%
  4. 一億以上9%
  5. 得到其他利益32%
  6. 並不是為了什麼利益9%
  7. 冇收過錢5%
  8. 只是他個人能力0%
  9. 只是他的個人偏見14%
  10. 估不到9%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Dec 2024, 09:21 UTCAnonymous Poll20 voters

721事件那天你在哪裏

  1. 已返到屋企50%
  2. 返屋企途中5%
  3. 在港島5%
  4. 在九龍5%
  5. 在新界(並非元朗)10%
  6. 在元朗( 不再現場)0%
  7. 在元朗港鐵站附近10%
  8. 不在香港5%
  9. 在元朗(白衣人)5%
  10. 不想回憶10%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Nov 2024, 05:37 UTCAnonymous Poll34 voters

根據最新的統計數據,香港的平均壽命約為 81.2歲。以下是不同年齡段的生存概率: - 65歲:約 90% 的人能夠活到65歲。 - 70歲:約 85% 的人能夠活到70歲。 - 75歲:約 80% 的人能夠活到75歲。 - 80歲:約 75% 的人能夠活到80歲。 - 85歲:約 65% 的人能夠活到85歲。 - 90歲:約 50% 的人能夠活到90歲。 你估你又會活到多少歲

  1. 我應該只可活到40歲9%
  2. 我應該只可活到50歲3%
  3. 我應該只可活到60歲9%
  4. 我應該可以活到70歲6%
  5. 我應該只可活到75歲9%
  6. 我應該可以活到80歲15%
  7. 我應該只可活到85歲3%
  8. 我應該可以活到90歲3%
  9. 我應該可以活到100歲21%
  10. 我已經死了24%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2024 to 30 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 941,095 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“APS Channel 氣功治療” (@APSMAGIC02), 198 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/APSMAGIC02.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.