Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Furizon - OFFICIAL NOTICEBOARD

@APSFurizon

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

744subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001667822599
TypeChannel
Username@APSFurizon
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/APSFurizon

Growth

743744743.57 August 2026 — 744 subscribers8 August 2026 — 744 subscribers8 August 2026 — 743 subscribers15 August 2026 — 744 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 743–744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 08:19744+1
8 Aug 2026, 19:55743-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:02744no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:13744first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
103.7%
avg views ÷ 744 subscribers
Avg views / post
772
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total3,859
Reactions total96
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

435 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16237.2%
🔥11626.7%
😭9421.6%
🎉5913.6%
👍40.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 435reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC304 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 Furizon Riverside is also available on BARQ 🐾 You can now find the event on BARQ and join it to stay updated with all the latest info, announcements, and community vibes. 🔗 Join the event here: https://barq.app/e/HBO0Uj7 See you there ✨ 🇮🇹🇮🇹🇮🇹 Furizon Riverside è ora disponibile anche su BARQ 🐾 Ora puoi trovare l’evento su BARQ e unirti per rimanere aggiornato su tutte le novità, gli annunci e le vibes dell

3👍2

25 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC689 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🔥35🎉8😭7

25 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC≈1,050 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 📢 Furizon Riverside 2026 is SOLD OUT! 🦊🔥 Wow, what an incredible response! All available spots for Furizon Riverside 2026 have been claimed in no time. Thank you so much for your support and enthusiasm! 💛 🇮🇹🇮🇹🇮🇹 📢 Furizon Riverside 2026 è SOLD OUT! 🦊🔥 Wow, che risposta incredibile! Tutti i posti disponibili per Furizon Riverside 2026 sono stati esauriti in pochissimo tempo. Grazie di cuore a tutti voi per i

5😭4

25 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,120 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 📢 Registrations for Furizon Riverside 2026 are officially OPEN! 🦊✨ Bring your fursuits, your badges and your fun: Furizon Riverside 2026 is waiting for you! To register, head over to FurPanel: 👉 furpanel.furizon.net See you at Riverside! 🐾 🇮🇹🇮🇹🇮🇹 📢 Le iscrizioni per Furizon Riverside 2026 sono ufficialmente APERTE! 🦊✨ Preparate le vostre fursuit, i vostri badge e tutto il divertimento: Furizon Riverside 202

6

23 Jun 2026, 11:01 UTC≈1,730 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 ⛰ FURIZON RIVERSIDE 2026 is coming! ✍️ Registration opens July 25th (12:00 CEST) Check it out on our website: 👀 https://furizon.net 🇮🇹🇮🇹🇮🇹 ⛰ FURIZON RIVERSIDE 2026 sta arrivando! ✍️Le iscrizioni apriranno il 25 luglio (12:00 CEST) Dai un’occhiata sul nostro sito: 👀 https://furizon.net

16

17 Jun 2026, 19:32 UTC≈1,120 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥131

17 Jun 2026, 19:31 UTC863 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

YEAH I KNOW U WANT FULL RES FILES WE'RE COMING 👏

🎉111

17 Jun 2026, 19:30 UTC≈3,110 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 📸 The official Furizon Polaris group photo is here! ❄️ More and more people join every year. Look at yourselves, you truly are the cutest ones!~ See you soon. It's time... for some Madness.💥 🇮🇹🇮🇹🇮🇹 📸 La foto di gruppo ufficiale di Furizon Polaris è qui! ❄️ Ogni anno, sempre più persone si uniscono a noi. E guardatevi, siete davvero i più cute di tutti~ Ci vediamo presto. It's time... for some Madness. 💥

31🎉2🔥2

9 Jun 2026, 22:07 UTC≈1,000 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🐾 PCD hitting hard right? Why not making it harder? https://youtu.be/x_JHXfQarr4?si=dnbj1pbOE4meeGA1 Many thanks to Deno Yuvi for editing the closing ceremony video!

25🔥7

6 Jun 2026, 13:46 UTC≈1,120 views69 reactionsread 8 August 2026

And remember: SIX SEVEN You are the cutest ones!

44😭13🔥9🎉3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @APSFurizon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 642,566 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Furizon - OFFICIAL NOTICEBOARD” (@APSFurizon), 744 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/APSFurizon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.