Channel
@APQBAOGUANG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
110subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002122184528 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @APQBAOGUANG |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/APQBAOGUANG |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 110 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 109 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 110 | no change |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 110 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【避雷曝光｜谨防被骗】 给为出海同仁与各大项目总避雷此人 骗子收款地址：TDvDyDFqwtJa8MsJrkEpD1PWXT5HXyGizT 请注意！！！ 越南当前风控严重，宣传越南兜底的短信商请勿轻易相信 认准😀阿帕奇官方ID😀 海外短信｜数据筛选｜渠道合作 🔔引流项目联系：@APQXX999999 🔔销售业务咨询： @apq58888 @apq68888 🔔阿帕奇群管理员： @apq66666 🔔阿帕奇交流群： @APQCH888 @APQCH588
【避雷曝光｜谨防被骗】 请各位项目方、同行提高警惕，避免踩坑！ 骗子Telegram ID： @HMBB10086 昵称： 海华万金油会员 骗子收款地址： TPgv6qmYsv6zjhairGG3jL9QNyAfxgWFFS 对方承诺提供 WS真机群发服务，并提供了一个所谓的发送后台。 开始发送后，仅仅10分钟后台就显示 5000条发送完成，回执全部成功。但我们提前埋好的测试手机号，一个都没有收到任何消息。 发现异常后第一时间与对方沟通，对方始终坚持表示已经发送成功，后台回执也全部显示成功。 然而，过了约半个小时后，后台早已显示发送完成的情况下，才开始陆续出现少量点击数据，与后台显示的发送情况严重不符，存在 虚假后台、虚假回执、数据造假 等行为，严重误导项目方判断真实发送情况。 提醒各位同行/盘总：交易前务必核实对方资质 如有与此人交易过或有类似经历，也欢迎出来交流，共同避雷，减少更多人的损失。 认准😀阿帕奇官…
Photo, posted without a caption
📛 骗子昵称：job💰 九儿-kwai代投开户（前号已炸） 宗介-开户代投 北北 👤 骗子用户名：@daitoufws @KwaiFB @luckydt688 @beibeixiong0 🎯 骗子ID：7702797592 7381538058 7959156723 7334225427 💳 骗子地址：TDw14vcbz3yRdhACfF7P49yKe8xid3Pv1r 💰 交易金额：505.00📝 📝 事件描述：找他开户 kwai的 开好户了 充值500 今天户里面钱都被转走了 认准😀阿帕奇官方ID😀 海外短信｜数据筛选｜渠道合作 🔔引流项目联系：@APQXX999999 🔔销售业务咨询： @apq58888 @apq68888 🔔阿帕奇群管理员： @apq66666 🔔阿帕奇交流群： @APQCH888 @APQCH588
❤1
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @APQBAOGUANG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“阿帕奇-全网曝光” (@APQBAOGUANG), 110 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/APQBAOGUANG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.