Channel
@ANnaNAvarskaya
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
292subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001427018880 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ANnaNAvarskaya |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ANnaNAvarskaya |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 292 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 294 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 293 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 294 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 295 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 295 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
128 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 41 | 32.0% | |
| custom 5834775782433492415 | 40 | 31.3% | |
| custom 5463258057607760727 | 22 | 17.2% | |
| custom 5927278344218349139 | 10 | 7.81% | |
| custom 5927128127737171257 | 8 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5811988730365351301 | 3 | 2.34% | |
| custom 5253475349311794318 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| custom 5832634092696374513 | 2 | 1.56% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В 1950е годы в США проводились тестирования губной помады. Для проверки качества нанимали лысых мужчин, которых женщины целовали, чтобы оценить, насколько хорошо помада держится, не размазывается и оставляет ли следы. Вдруг, ты до сих пор не знаешь кем хочешь стать, когда вырастешь.
😁4custom 58347757824334924153
Directed by Robert B. Weide
😁6
Некоторые люди становятся в этом мире- вечными детьми, жаждущими только удовольствия и веселья. И это в какой-то момент превращается в крик, топанье ножками, хвастовство и доказывание. Только вот кому? Да все равно кому, нить уже давно потерялась, просто привычка- получать временную дозировку дофамина, а не внутренне наполнять себя. А потом, когда тебе твоё Я говорит "пора взрослеть"- ты бежишь от себя. Где бы спрят…
custom 58347757824334924157
File, posted without a caption
😁3custom 59271281277371712571
В 1950е годы в США проводились тестирования губной помады. Для проверки качества нанимали лысых мужчин, которых женщины целовали, чтобы оценить, насколько хорошо помада держится, не размазывается и оставляет ли следы. А в современном мире помаду тестируют на других местах🔥
custom 58347757824334924152custom 59271281277371712572
Доброе утро! Отдыхаем. Наполняемся.
😁6custom 54632580576077607275
Привет🐯 "Добро пожаловать на борт!" А ведь когда-то я хотела пойти в модельную индустрию. Настроение: любоваться 💗
custom 583477578243349241513custom 546325805760776072710custom 59271281277371712573
Какой- то замкнутый круг получается: нужно насосать на курсы, а как, если ты не умеешь, а если получится , то как бы и не надо... а ты очень хотела... а что хотела, пока делала- забыла... а если ты себя сама делаешь, то как бы зачем вообще сосать... В общем, без минета не разобраться... Да и настроение какое-то неопределённое: то ли жалко тех, у кого не хватает денег или не умеют, а, может, тех, кто умеет, а не ком…
😁6custom 58119887303653513013custom 54632580576077607272
Размышления на ночь:
custom 59272783442183491396custom 54632580576077607275😁4custom 58347757824334924152
File, posted without a caption
custom 58347757824334924156
И так далее.
😁12
У моего мужа #ЕстьИдея для ВАС 🩵
custom 59272783442183491394custom 58326340926963745132custom 59271281277371712572
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ANnaNAvarskaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙰𝙽𝙽𝙰 𝙽𝙰𝚅𝙰𝚁𝚂𝙺𝙰𝚈𝙰” (@ANnaNAvarskaya), 292 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ANnaNAvarskaya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.