Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

bye,atlantis

@ANL4SS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001931750645
TypeChannel
Username@ANL4SS
Description6ecт тваūc евер
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ANL4SS

Growth

2011 Aug 2026, 19:02 — 20 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 19:15 — 20 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 19:0211 Aug 2026, 19:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19–21 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 19:1520no change
11 Aug 2026, 19:0220first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 25 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
274
Videos
11
Links
40

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

87 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53978682199082489472629.9%
custom 53999409281756245952124.1%
custom 53999730502360311671213.8%
custom 5397982229815121836910.3%
🍓78.05%
🆒66.90%
🐳66.90%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2024 to 17 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Sept 2024, 13:42 UTC190 views23 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

// * вот и история длинную в 6 месяцев подошла к концу я пишу это со слезами на глазах,атлантис для меня самый душевный проект,я вложила в него всю себя и прощаться с вами для меня и для девочек безумно больно,но рано или поздно это должно было произойти.Мы не хотим превращать то,во что вкладывали уйму сил в бездушную рутину.Мы любим вас и будим любить,всегда.Я не знаю,вернемся ли мы,но я очень на это на

custom 53978682199082489479custom 53999409281756245958custom 53979822298151218366

8 Sept 2024, 08:10 UTC213 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

thank you 💚

custom 53978682199082489477custom 53999409281756245954custom 53979822298151218363

8 Sept 2024, 08:00 UTC393 views31 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ᅠᅠ 365 ࣪ party gꪱrl . . ⭐️‹ t.me/ANL4SS ##. who tf are u ? ( WE ARE BRAT ) 🔥> dial 999 ﹕ it's a good time , @.HERE WE GO &. sdd ! label ᅠᅠ

custom 539997305023603116712custom 539786821990824894710custom 53999409281756245959

8 Sept 2024, 07:56 UTC168 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://t.me/boost/ANL4SS проголосуйте пожалуйста 🙏🏻

4 Sept 2024, 15:19 UTC143 viewsread 11 August 2026

берём рест от репостов на несколько дней💔💔

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ANL4SS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 894,234 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“bye,atlantis” (@ANL4SS), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ANL4SS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.