Channel
@AMLongold
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
445subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001858671399 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AMLongold |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AMLongold |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 445 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 445 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Solana RWAs just crossed $2.8B and @JupiterExchange infrastructure is a big reason it scaled this fast Having exposure to a profitable company as a hedge makes sense, $JUP is one way to play it Don't sleep on the next wave
The best place to trade $BTC is starting to be @solana. In Jupiter cbBTC-USDC $5k to $20k fills, both buyer and seller medians have recently moved below zero, meaning users are getting outright price improvement versus the pre-fill Binance reference before even counting Binance fees. The improvement also coincides with prop AMM share picking up. The next question is when does price discovery start to move onchain?
What a week. Here’s the Bitwise Hyperliquid ETF $BHYP Trading Report after the first five days.* - $30.5M in AUM - Average daily volume: $9.2M - Total inflows: $26.9M - The only spot Hyperliquid ETF to stake assets in-house - The only spot Hyperliquid ETF to publish the fund’s wallet addresses - 10% of the Fund’s annual management fee will be held as HYPE on the Bitwise balance sheet** Grateful to our investors for…
Cashflow is built with the Jupiverse in mind, with deep integrations across Jupiter products: Jup Lend, Swaps, and $JupUSD. Deposit $10k cumulatively into Jup Lend via Cashflow to mint exclusive Jupiter Lender badge into your Cashflow Passport. Just Use Jupiter. On Cashflow.
Okay, so Jupiter did its Planetary Call & casually dropped win after win after win? 🪐 Bitwise crossed $500M, Jupiter Mobile became the best designed dApp of Solana And fresh product alpha, ecosystem updates & basically everything you care about 👇 1️⃣ Bitwise x Ethena x Jupiter Lend ✅ Bitwise’s market crossed $500M incredibly fast → Jupiter Lend itself crossed $2B TVL ✅ Institutions are no longer just “exploring …
There's a new class in crypto: the revenue chains. The leaders are Hyperliquid & Solana. Both do some overlapping things, and some different things. Both have exceptional communities, usage, use cases, etc. I think that both will rise together, just as iOS and Android both rode the structural adoption of mobile. In the case of the revenue chains, they are riding the wave of capital markets coming onchain. Right …
Track HYPE ETF flows here: https://farside.co.uk/hyp/
Wall Street Finder Ep.190 ▣ (Record-breaking) Volatility and FOMO 1) Issue Dive: Legendary, Legendary · Record-breaking volatility - On the 21st, the KOSPI's daily fluctuation increased by +606 points... the largest ever. - Frequently exposed to extreme upside and downside volatility this year - Even considering the scaling effect due to the exponent level-up, the increase in 'frequency' is significant. · Unpreced…
Overall, perhaps because it is the US Memorial Day holiday weekend The whole market has a quiet atmosphere. I found out what kind of day it was Memorial Day in the United States, like Korea's Memorial Day, is a day to honor fallen heroes, but its date is not fixed and is designated as the "last Monday of May." Thanks to this, a three-day "Long Weekend" spanning Saturday, Sunday, and Monday is created consistent…
It is reported that Tea Protocol's TGE & AirDrop has been postponed from February 5 to March 19.
Meta is not born suddenly. The story is always spread across the market first. The world will change like this. It will replace a specific existing object. At first, only a few people believe that story. Most people are skeptical. From then on, what matters is not the technology, but the price. Related stocks begin to move rapidly, strongly, and noticeably. Then, people are mistaken when they see that rise. Sinc…
📢 ZachXBT Identity Revealed?! ZachXBT, an anonymous influencer famous for his independent forensic investigations into cryptocurrency fraud, scams, and theft, has been targeted in return. A Twitter user, revealing their identity as someone who participated in a swimming competition, is criticizing ZachXBT by stating, "ZachXBT does not investigate people who donated to him or gave him tokens." #ZachXBT
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AMLongold. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,007,241 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@AMLongold named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Very simple about crypto” (@AMLongold), 445 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AMLongold.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.